Search clinical trials by condition, location and status
The goal of this clinical trial is to determine the effect of a mucoadhesive system that releases the vitamin A derivative, fenretinide (FMS), on precancerous surface epithelial (lining tissue inside your mouth) changes. Specifically, does application of the FMS induce specific changes: 1) reduction in the clinical size, 2) reduction in the histologic grade of precancerous changes (determined by microscopic examination), 3) reduce the nuclear LOH events (changes in copy number of key genes to prevent oral cancer). The first part of this study entails a single FMS application to persons having their wisdom teeth removed. This study is done to confirm how long the FMS needs to remain in place to release the cancer-preventive agent. Participants will: 1) Have the FMS applied over the impacted wisdom tooth for 15 minutes, 2) FMS is removed, saliva is collected, and blood is drawn from a vein in the arm. 3) Tissue overlying the impacted wisdom tooth is removed and analyzed. The second, multi-FMS application entails patients who have precancerous oral surface epithelial changes. These patients will have: 1) a piece of the precancerous tissue removed (biopsy) and examined under a microscope to ensure the diagnosis. Blood is drawn from a vein in the arm., 2) One week after the biopsy, return to discuss the results. If the changes are precancerous, this person will be given FMS to apply to the site twice a day. 3) Patients return every 7 to 10 days (for a total of six weeks) for an oral exam and clinical pictures, return the FMS, and obtain new FMS for the upcoming week., 4) At week 3 (midway), blood is drawn from a vein in the arm., 5) After the six weeks of treatment, clinical pictures are obtained, blood is drawn from a vein in the arm and all of the remaining treated tissue is completely removed. The patient is securely contacted and results are discussed. 6) Approximately 6 weeks after the final surgery, patients return for a complete oral examination and clinical pictures are obtained.
This study is being done to see how produce delivery with or without nutritional education affects what people eat and if it can help improve diet and nutrition in low-income families and their ability to get enough healthy food. Research shows strong evidence regarding the role of diet in new cancer rates and cancer deaths. Although dietary guidelines have been established at the national level to improve diet quality, the average dietary quality remains low in American households, particularly in low-income communities. These disadvantaged communities are also more likely to be food insecure (having limited or uncertain access to nutritious food). FreshFix is a community-based organization that provides nutritious foods from local farmers to communities in Western New York and offers a Half-Price Produce delivery program which is targeted for lower-income and underserved communities. Participating in the FreshFix program with access to nutritional education materials may decrease food insecurity and improve diet quality in low-income families.
To develop and test liver cancer prevention educational material.
This study collects health and genetic information to implement cancer prevention and treatment strategies.
Early diagnosis of cancer allows for better treatment outcomes, higher survival rates, and lower costs of care. It is shown that cancer monitoring for cancer in at-risk populations is a key component in early diagnosis. The HMH Hennessey Institute for Cancer prevention and Applied Molecular Science (HICAP) is a newly founded institute, providing clinical services for cancer screening and risk assessment to the community, as well as research in cancer risk and prevention. The CanScan registry will prospectively collect data from participants in the form of questionnaires. The registry will also capture data that is collected as per non-research assessments, for participants who consent to participate. The registry will facilitate better understanding of cancer risk, screening, and diagnostics.
This clinical trial evaluates the use of self-collected vaginal samples for human papillomavirus (HPV) testing in patients referred for a colposcopy and/or cervical excisional procedures to improve cervical cancer prevention. HPV is a common virus which usually causes infections that last only a few months, but sometimes can last longer. It is known to cause a variety of cancers including cancer of the cervix. Even though there are ways to detect cervical cancer early, many individuals do not undergo screening that involves pelvic exams. Over half of all new cervical cancer cases are among those who have either never been screened or who are not screened enough. Without appropriate screening and care, preventable pre-cancers may turn into cancer. A new way to detect cervical cancer is to have individuals collect their own vaginal sample for HPV testing to know their risk for cervical cancer. This may give individuals more flexibility and comfort having the ability to collect samples themselves, compared to a doctor performing a speculum examination and collecting the samples in a clinic. This study compares clinical accuracy of HPV testing on self-collected vaginal samples versus cervical samples collected by clinician. The Self-collection for HPV Testing to Improve Cervical Cancer Prevention (SHIP) Trial is part of the National Cancer Institute (NCI)'s Cervical Cancer 'Last Mile' Initiative, a public private partnership that seeks to increase access to cervical cancer screening. The SHIP Trial focuses on developing clinical evidence to inform the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)'s regulatory reviews of self-collection approaches as alternative sample collection approaches for cervical cancer screening. Several industry partner-specific self-collection device and assay combinations will be non-competitively and independently evaluated with a similar study design framework to inform pre-approval and/or post-approval regulatory requirements.
This clinical trial evaluates the use of self-collected vaginal samples for human papillomavirus (HPV) testing in patients referred for a colposcopy and/or cervical excisional procedures to improve cervical cancer prevention. HPV is a common virus which usually causes infections that last only a few months, but sometimes can last longer. HPV is known to cause a variety of cancers including cervical cancer. Even though there are ways to detect cervical cancer, many individuals are not diagnosed. Over half of all new cervical cancer cases are among those who have either never been screened or who are not screened enough. The low screening numbers show more testing needs to be done. Without appropriate screening and care, preventable precancer may turn into cancer. A new way to detect cervical cancer is to have individuals collect their own sample for HPV testing to know their risk for cervical cancer. This may give individuals more flexibility and comfort having the ability to collect samples themselves, compared to a doctor performing a speculum examination and collecting the samples in a clinic. Information gathered from this study compares clinical accuracy of HPV testing on self-collected vaginal samples versus cervical samples collected by clinician. The Self-collection for HPV Testing to Improve Cervical Cancer Prevention (SHIP) Trial is part of the National Cancer Institute (NCI)'s Cervical Cancer 'Last Mile' Initiative, a public private partnership that seeks to increase access to cervical cancer screening. The SHIP Trial focuses on developing clinical evidence to inform the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)'s regulatory reviews of self-collection approaches as alternative sample collection approaches for cervical cancer screening. Several industry partner-specific self-collection device and assay combinations will be non-competitively and independently evaluated with a similar study design framework to inform pre-approval and/or post-approval regulatory requirements.
The purpose of this study is to understand how to leverage structures and processes of academic health department (AHD) partnerships to facilitate implementation of cancer related evidence-based programs and policies (EBPPs).
This clinical trial is studying the genetic changes in cells associated with different types of cancer in Indigenous American (IA) populations in the Southwest to improve cancer screening, precision prevention, and therapeutic intervention for individual in these communities. IA tribes have much lower rates of cancer screening, have more limited access to healthcare, are more often diagnosed at later stages of disease, and have the poorest outcomes in all types of cancer when compared to any other racial and ethnic group in the United States. Due to these significant cancer health disparities, IAs have been understudied and little is known about the molecular characterization of tumors arising in IAs. Undergoing genetic testing of tumors may improve cancer outcomes in IA participants and communities.
There are three main objectives of the protocol. First, we will evaluate the added clinical- and cost- effectiveness of parent-targeted motivational aids (reminder/recall and phone-based MI) alone and when combined with community-targeted healthcare access assistance beyond the effects of clinician-targeted training. Second, we will estimate the differential effectiveness of the implementation strategies by patient-level factors (age, race/ethnicity, sex, distance from home to clinic, social vulnerability). Third, we will measure moderation of implementation strategy effectiveness by clinic-level factors (HPV vaccination priority, resources, clinic visit types, scheduling practices, and implementation success). Within 11 rural North Central Florida counties, we will evaluate the layering of evidence-based implementation strategies that progressively addressing clinician, parent, and healthcare access barriers faced by rural communities on HPV vaccination rates among 9- to 12-year-olds. To best address our main question of whether layering complementary strategies continues to increase effects on HPV vaccination, we will test our hypotheses with a three-arm cluster randomized study design of nested strategies. The proposed nested study design optimizes evaluation, causal inference, and scientific rigor by putting the maximum number of clinics towards addressing the layering of strategies. Randomization will occur at the clinic level. All clinics will receive implementation strategy A: clinician-targeted recommendation training. A random 20 of 30 of clinics will also receive facilitation of parent-targeted motivational aids (B) for an implementation strategy package of A+B. Finally, a random half of the clinics who receive A+B will also receive community-targeted healthcare access (C) for a total implementation strategy package of A+B+C. This equates to a three-arm cluster randomized trial in which 10 clinics receive clinician- targeted recommendation training alone (A), 10 clinics receive clinician-targeted recommendation training and parent-targeted motivational aids (A+B), and 10 clinics receive clinician-targeted recommendation training, parent-targeted motivational aids, and community-targeted healthcare access (A+B+C).