This clinical trial focuses on testing the efficacy of different digital interventions to promote re-engagement in cancer-related long-term follow-up care for adolescent and young adult (AYA) survivors of childhood cancer.
The goal of this clinical trial is to \[primary purpose: e.g., learn if intervention or health behavior can treat, prevent, diagnose etc.\] in \[describe participant population/primary condition; could include any of the following: sex/gender, age groups, healthy volunteers\]. The main question\[s\] it aims to answer \[is/are\]: Does dupilumab or swallowed topical fluticasone improve the diameter of the esophagus more? Does dupilumab or swallowed topical fluticasone reduce inflammation in the esophagus more? Are comparative effective clinical trials feasible in this patient population? Researchers will compare dupilumab 300 mg weekly compared to swallowed fluticasone to see if there is a difference in treatment response. Participants will be asked to: * Be randomized to either dupilumab sq weekly or swallowed topical fluticasone twice daily. * Participate in 8 study visits over 52 weeks * Complete questionnaires * Have an endoscopy with biopsies and EndoFLIP measurements. * Swallow an Esophageal String Test
DeTECTS: Dupilumab Versus Topical Corticosteroid Effectiveness - Comparison in the Treatment of Stenotic EoE
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
| Inclusion Criteria | Exclusion Criteria |
|---|---|
|
|
Sponsor: University of Colorado, Denver
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.