RECRUITING

The Use of CCK vs PS in Revision TKAs

Study Overview

This clinical trial focuses on testing the efficacy of different digital interventions to promote re-engagement in cancer-related long-term follow-up care for adolescent and young adult (AYA) survivors of childhood cancer.

Description

This study aims to compare the clinical impact of Constrained Condylar versus Posterior Stabilized Knee (PS) bearings on patient satisfaction and surgical outcomes including mid-term survivorship among patients undergoing revision total knee arthroplasty.

Official Title

A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Constrained Condylar vs Posterior Stabilized Articulations in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty

Quick Facts

Study Start:2025-07-01
Study Completion:2038-07-01
Study Type:Not specified
Phase:Not Applicable
Enrollment:Not specified
Status:RECRUITING

Study ID

NCT06782295

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Ages Eligible for Study:18 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:ALL
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:No
Standard Ages:ADULT, OLDER_ADULT
Inclusion CriteriaExclusion Criteria
  1. * Patients between 18-80 years of age
  2. * Patients who are undergoing both femoral and tibial component revisions, or isolated femoral component revisions with a retained tibial component that is compatible with PS or CCK bearings
  3. * Patients who are at least 6-weeks out from primary TKA surgery, with complete pre-operative and post-operative knee radiographs obtained at standard of care perioperative visits (AP/lateral and patellar views)
  4. * Patients undergoing rTKA for indications including aseptic component loosening, flexion or extension coronal or sagittal instability, component malalignment, arthrofibrosis, patellar maltracking, reimplantation following single or two-stage exchange revision for prosthetic joint infection or bearing surface wear when femoral or tibial component revision is indicated.
  5. * The use of revision total knee arthroplasty systems which have PS and CCK bearing options including different degree options of coronal and rotational constraint (to be individually randomized per constrained option):
  6. * Zimmer Biomet Persona, NexGen, or Vanguard
  7. * Smith and Nephew Legion
  8. * DJO / Enovis Empowr
  9. * Stryker Triathlon
  10. * Link SymphoKnee
  11. * Depuy Attune sion Criteria:
  1. Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  2. Severe psychiatric disorders
  3. Active substance abuse
  4. Unstable medical conditions
  5. Inability to comply with study requirements

Contacts and Locations

Study Contact

Omary Behery, MD
CONTACT
630-339-2230
omar.behery@rushortho.com
Anne DeBenedetti, MSc
CONTACT
312-432-2468
anne.debenedetti@rushortho.com

Study Locations (Sites)

Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60612
United States

Collaborators and Investigators

Sponsor: Rush University Medical Center

Study Record Dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Registration Dates

Study Start Date2025-07-01
Study Completion Date2038-07-01

Study Record Updates

Study Start Date2025-07-01
Study Completion Date2038-07-01

Terms related to this study

Keywords Provided by Researchers

  • revision total knee replacement
  • cck
  • ps
  • coronal instability
  • sagittal instability

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

  • Aseptic Loosening of Prosthetic Joint
  • Instability of Prosthetic Joint
  • Reimplantation for Periprosthetic Joint Infection
  • Femoral Revision Indicated
  • Tibial Component Revision