RECRUITING

Comparison of Single vs. Dual Perclose Devices for Large-Bore Access Closure in TAVR

Description

This study will compare the use of one Perclose device to the usual approach of two devices for pre-closure during Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR). The study will compare the time it takes for bleeding to stop using the different closure approaches. The study will also compare complications when using one Perclose device versus two.

Study Overview

Study Details

Study overview

This study will compare the use of one Perclose device to the usual approach of two devices for pre-closure during Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR). The study will compare the time it takes for bleeding to stop using the different closure approaches. The study will also compare complications when using one Perclose device versus two.

Comparative Efficacy of Single vs. Dual Perclose Devices for Large-Bore Access Closure in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparison of Single vs. Dual Perclose Devices for Large-Bore Access Closure in TAVR

Condition
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
Intervention / Treatment

-

Contacts and Locations

Milwaukee

Aurora St. Luke's Medical Center, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States, 53215

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

For general information about clinical research, read Learn About Studies.

Eligibility Criteria

  • * Patient age 18 or older
  • * Transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR)
  • * Implantation of CoreValve replacement valve
  • * Access using 14 or 16 French sheaths
  • * English speaking
  • * Alternative Access Routes: Patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) via alternative access routes such as subclavian access or transapical access.
  • * Planned Surgical Cut-Down: Patients planned for surgical cut-down procedures rather than percutaneous access.
  • * Vascular Access Complications: Patients with known vascular complications at the femoral access site, such as residual hematoma, recent femoral arteriotomy or venotomy within the past 10 days, history of significant vascular complications or prior intravascular closure device use within the previous 30 days.
  • * Arterial or Venous Issues: Patients with small femoral arteries or veins (\<5 mm in diameter), patients with access sites located in vascular grafts.
  • * Infection or Inflammation: Active systemic or cutaneous infection or inflammation in the vicinity of the groin.
  • * Coagulation and Hematological Disorders: Known history of bleeding diathesis, coagulopathy, hypercoagulability, or platelet count \<100,000 cells/mm³. Pre-existing immunodeficiency disorder or chronic use of high-dose systemic steroids.
  • * Severe Morbidity: Severe co-existing morbidities with a life expectancy less than 12 months.
  • * Mobility Issues: Patients unable to routinely walk at least 20 feet without assistance.
  • * Recent Anticoagulation: Use of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) within 8 hours before or after the procedure.
  • * Pregnancy and Lactation: Pregnant or lactating women.
  • * Incompatible Procedure Plan: Patients receiving the Edwards Sapien valve (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA)
  • * Contraindications: Patients with contraindications for the use of Perclose device.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 Years to

Sexes Eligible for Study

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Collaborators and Investigators

Wake Forest University Health Sciences,

Suhail Q Allaqaband, MD, PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR, Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Study Record Dates

2026-07