Search clinical trials by condition, location and status
Cephalosporin antibiotics are commonly used but can result in allergic reactions and anaphylaxis. There is no clear diagnostic approach for cephalosporin-allergic patients, and guidance for the use of other antibiotics in allergic patients is based on side chain chemical similarity and limited skin testing evidence. This project includes a clinical trial and mechanistic studies to optimize the approach to cephalosporin allergy and advance future diagnostics.
Parents of children with food allergies that are medically established will be able to participate in 6 one-hour weekly virtual Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) groups, and outcomes will be measured for anxiety, depression and quality of life. Possible benefits include improvement in psychological functioning and quality of life of families, as well as improved understanding of the use of group Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) for parents of children with medically established food allergies.
This protocol is a natural history study designed to evaluate subjects (and some family members) with suspected or identified genetic diseases of allergic inflammation or Immune Dysregulation. Patients determined by clinical history and outside evaluations to be of interest will be consented and enrolled into this study. Blood specimens, stored blood products and derivatives, saliva, hair, fingernail clippings, cord blood, umbilical cord, bone marrow, tissue biopsies and/or buccal swabs from such patients and/or their family members will be obtained for research studies related to understanding genetic and immunopathogenic bases of these diseases. Outside medical records may be obtained, and patient evaluations may be performed to correlate to research laboratory testing results.
The purpose of this study is to strengthen our ability to accurately diagnose allergies and understand cellular, humoral, genetic components and physiological changes in allergic disease
MIRON-CCS is a multicenter retrospective diagnostic study designed to evaluate the role of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) in the diagnosis and clinical stage classification of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) as defined by the Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) AMI staging system. The study retrospectively analyzes biomarker data from patients diagnosed with AMI across multiple institutions, focusing on whether hs-cTnI levels-measured at specific time points-can reliably identify and stratify patients into CCS-defined AMI clinical stages (Stage 1 to Stage 4). It aims to correlate hs-cTnI kinetics and peak levels with clinical stage, presentation patterns, and outcomes. This trial seeks to offer a biomarker-based alternative to imaging-heavy staging, potentially streamlining early diagnosis and therapeutic triage for AMI patients in varied clinical settings.
The primary objective of this study is to determine the effect of maridebart cafraglutide relative to placebo on insulin sensitivity in participants with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) treated with stable dose of metformin.
The purpose of this study is to learn about how long apalutamide and enzalutamide are taken by men to treat mCSPC. Prostate cancer is one of the most common cancers in men. The prostate is a gland in the male body that helps make semen. Metastatic cancer is a cancer that has spread to other parts of the body. Castration-sensitive prostate cancer means the cancer is being controlled by keeping the testosterone levels as low as would be expected if the testicles were removed by surgery. This is a real-world study, not a clinical study. This means that researchers will look at what happens when men receive the treatments prescribed by their own doctor as part of their usual healthcare treatment. In this study, researchers will use information from cancer clinics (Flatiron Health electronic health records). The study will include patients' information from the database for men who: * Were identified to have mCSPC. * Started treatment with apalutamide or enzalutamide (index date) for mCSPC. * Were 18 years of age or older on the index date. Men in this study will be taking apalutamide or enzalutamide for treatment of their mCSPC. The study will compare how long men take apalutamide or enzalutamide. This study will use patient information from cancer clinics. Information from start of apalutamide or enzalutamide treatment until information is available in the database will be used to describe how long patients receive treatment.
The project aims to evaluate a nurse-led intervention to reduce inappropriate emergency department (ED) use among adult patients seen at Geisinger's Community Medicine Service Line (CMSL) clinics. The intervention occurs immediately following an appointment where a patient receives a diagnosis of an ambulatory sensitive condition (ASC; i.e., a condition considered to be a risk factor for near-term ED use). The evaluation will compare eligible patients with an ASC who were randomly assigned to receive follow-up outreach (patient portal message or call) from a nurse (who was automatically prompted via the Epic electronic health record system to initiate outreach) with those who were randomly assigned to receive standard care. Analyses will be intent-to-treat. The primary outcome is ED use in the week following the appointment. We ran an earlier version of this intervention (NCT06798389). The current study is modified based on results and clinical guidance. Specifically, more conditions will be included as qualifying ASCs for enrollment. Patients under 30 will be excluded. And rather than calling all patients as in the original study, patient portal messages will be sent to patient portal users (i.e., those with a portal account and 1+ login in the 6 months prior to enrollment). Finally, in the first study, the intervention was differentially effective by age group (\<45, 45-64, 65+). Our primary analysis will be conducted separately by age group, though we will conduct an analysis combining across age groups. We will also run an analysis separately by modality (call, portal message) to determine the effectiveness of each modality individually for eligible patients. We will run the study until we reach at least 4,330 patients in each of the following groups: patients aged 30-45, patients aged 45-64, patients aged 65+, patients eligible for a call, patients eligible for a portal message. Our estimated sample size is at least 4,330x3 = 12,990, because by the time we reach our target in each of the three age groups, we expect we will already have reached 4,330 patients in each of the individual modalities (but if that is not the case, we will continue running the study until we reach 4,330 in each age group and modality). We may be required to stop the study early at the direction of clinical or operational leaders. We will not analyze data before deciding to stop the study.
This Phase II study aims to evaluate efficacy and safety of the combination of JSB462 (also known as luxdegalutamide) at 100 mg and 300 mg once a day (QD) doses + abiraterone compared with an androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI, abiraterone or enzalutamide) in participants with metastatic Hormone Sensitive Prostate Cancer (mHSPC) and to select the recommended dose of the combination for phase III. Towards that end, the totality of the efficacy, safety, tolerability and PK data from participants randomized in the study will be evaluated
In this project, the investigators would like to learn if 24 weeks (about 5 and a half months) of omalizumab injections, given every 2 weeks, will be safe and effective for food allergic people who have a total immunoglobulin E (IgE) above the current FDA approved dosing regimen enabling a person to increase tolerance to the food(s) that the person is allergic to. The investigators would also like to learn if participants who demonstrate increased tolerance to food after 24 weeks of omalizumab, can introduce the food into the diet utilizing an additional 8 weeks (about 2 months) of twice weekly omalizumab injections.