Search clinical trials by condition, location and status
Plain radiographs and MRI play an important role in the diagnosis of intra-articular knee pathology and can be used to guide treatment decisions. These imaging modalities however have several limitations which can lead to misdiagnosis, incorrect treatment decisions, and suboptimal patient care. The gold standard for confirmation of intra-articular knee pathology is formal diagnostic knee arthroscopy. Diagnostic knee arthroscopy must be performed in the operating room under general anesthesia, which adds both risk and cost to the patient. In contrast to formal diagnostic arthroscopy which uses a 4.8mm arthroscope, needle arthroscopy (NA) uses a 1.9mm nano-arthroscope. NA with a nano-arthroscope is a technique which allows direct high quality intra-articular visualization to be obtained without general anesthesia, and can be performed either in the office or the operating room (OR). One specific application for this technology is in the evaluation of patients who are being considered for either a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or a unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). An essential component of the pre-operative work-up is determining if the patient has isolated unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis (OA) or more widespread tricompartmental knee OA. This distinction is essential as each condition is treated differently; isolated unicompartmental knee OA is treated with a UKA while tricompartmental OA is treated with TKA. Our primary objective is to determine if NA is an effective, safe, and cost effective tool to confirm the presence of unicompartmental OA and thus guide patient management in the decision to perform UKA or TKA. Disclosure: This study is sponsored by Arthrex Inc, the manufacturer of the NanoScope™ operative arthroscopy imaging system which will be used in the study. Arthrex will provide NanoScope™ supplies only; no direct monetary funding will be provided.
The investigators are evaluating the postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty that receive either systemic lidocaine or ultrasound-guided adductor canal block as part of their anesthetic plan.
In the US, if an infection in an artificial knee joint doesn't heal with antibiotics alone, the standard treatment is a two-stage revision of the artificial knee. In the first stage, the surgeon will remove the artificial knee and clean out the area around the knee. They will then place an antibiotic spacer. An antibiotic spacer is a type of artificial joint that will release antibiotics into the knee space continuously over time. The spacer allows only very basic function of the knee. The patient may need to use crutches or a walker while the antibiotic spacer is in place. After surgery to place the antibiotic spacer, the surgeon may prescribe a course of antibiotics as well. Because the antibiotic spacer is not as durable as a regular artificial joint, after the infection is gone, another surgery is required to take the spacer out and put a new artificial knee joint in. There is another way for artificial joint infections to be treated. This is a one-stage revision. In this treatment, the surgeon will remove the artificial knee and clean out the area around the knee. Then the surgeon will place a new artificial knee in using a special kind of cement that contains antibiotics. The cement will release antibiotics into the knee space continuously over time (the surgeon may prescribe a course of antibiotics as well). The new artificial joint with antibiotic cement will function almost the same as the original artificial knee. This means that while the infection is healing the patient will be able to do most of the regular daily activities. However, the antibiotic cement is not as durable as what is normally used to implant an artificial knee. The artificial knee with the antibiotic cement may need to be replaced with a regular artificial knee. When replacement will need to be done is dependent on patient weight, bone strength and activity level, among other things. When it is time to replace the antibiotic cement artificial knee, the patient will have another surgery where the surgeon will take the antibiotic cement artificial knee and put a new artificial knee joint in. Investigators know that both the one- and two-stage revision work equally well to heal the infection, but investigators don't know which patients prefer or which provides better function after many years. This study will randomly assign patients to receive either a one-stage or two-stage revision and then follow them for 5 years to ask them about pain, function, and satisfaction.