91 Clinical Trials for Various Conditions
The VISABL-AFL clinical investigation is a prospective, single-arm, multi-center, interventional, Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) trial. The primary objectives of VISABL-AFL are to assess the safety and efficacy of radiofrequency (RF) ablation of type-I atrial flutter performed with the Vision-MR Ablation Catheter 2.0 in the iCMR environment.
Atrial Flutter Typical
Typical atrial flutter ablation involving forming a line of block across the cavotricuspid isthmus in the right atrium has become a commonly performed procedure and is considered a class I indicated procedure for patients who wish to pursue maintenance of sinus rhythm. The ablation generally involves 2-3 catheters and is typically performed through the femoral vein(s). After the ablation procedure, the patient is placed on bed rest for 4 hours, and typically discharged home the same day on oral anticoagulation. Catheter technology has improved over the past several years allowing for more rapid ablation with shorter procedure times. Ultrasound has also become more routinely used when obtaining venous access for the patient. To date, ablation of typical atrial flutter through the left or right arm has not been reported. Diagnostic electrophysiology studies have been performed through the arm and AV node ablation has also been reported from the cephalic, internal jugular, axillary and subclavian veins. The potential benefits include shorter recovery time, reduced risk of retroperitoneal bleed, and the avoidance of access complications from the groin. This study aims to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of performing typical atrial flutter ablation through the arm. Specifically, the study will aim to: 1. Compare the recovery time immediately after the procedure using upper extremity access compared to the standard approach. 2. Compare the success rate of patients that undergo ablation of typical atrial flutter through the upper extremity venous system (experimental approach) to the standard approach (i.e., through the femoral vein(s). Success will be defined as ablation that leads to evidence for bidirectional block across the right atrial cavotricuspid isthmus. 3. Establish what the potential complications are from performing typical atrial flutter through the left or right arm. The left arm will be the preferred site for access because of less tortuosity to reach the heart. If one side cannot be accessed the alternate arm will be used, but will be left to the discretion of the operator. The operator will have the discretion to switch to a femoral approach at any time. 4. Compare the complication rates of the experimental approach evaluated by the inability to access the vein, and other complications (e.g., bleeding, vein thrombosis, heart perforation) from accessing the vein in the arm to the complication rates of the standard approach. 5. Compare long term (i.e., 1 month and 1 year) success of the experimental approach vs. the standard approach as assessed by maintenance of normal sinus rhythm, without recurrent typical right atrial flutter with in person visits and phone call or chart evaluations. 6. Compare pain severity of the insertion site between the experimental and standard approaches.
Atrial Flutter
To compare the relative efficacy for calcium pre-treatment in decreasing incidence of drug induced hypotension after diltiazem administration for treatment of AFF with RVR. Null Hypothesis: There will be no difference between groups in incidence of hypotension after pretreatment with calcium prior to bolus of diltiazem.
Atrial Fibrillation With Rapid Ventricular Response, Hypotension Drug-Induced
Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE), has been an essential component of Radiofrequency (RF) ablations for AF given its association with decreased fluoroscopy time and complication rates, and therefore it is logical that this can be applied to CTI ablations for AFL as well. There are however no studies to date that directly focused on the benefits of adding ICE during CTI dependent AFL ablation. Currently it is not required that operators use ICE in every case of AFL ablation. Investigators intended to study the routine use of ICE in such cases and to see if there is a significant benefit in routine use of ICE.
Atrial Flutter
The Acutus Medical AcQForce Flutter clinical study is a prospective, multi-center, non-randomized global study designed to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of the AcQBlate Force Sensing Ablation System in the ablation management of symptomatic cavotricuspid isthmus dependent atrial flutter.
Typical Atrial Flutter
The purpose of this study is to perform ultra-high density mapping of the left atrium (a chamber of the heart) using the the Rhythmia Mapping System and to determine whether additional ablation in areas of wavefront discontinuities identified by the map will reduce the likelihood of both atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter.
Atrial Fibrillation
The FAST Trial Registry is a prospective observational cohort study of fetuses with a new diagnosis of atrial flutter (AF) or supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) that is severe enough to consider prenatal treatment (see eligibility criteria below). Aims of the Registry include to establish a large clinical database to determine and compare the efficacy and safety of different prenatal treatment strategies including observation without immediate treatment, transplacental antiarrhythmic fetal treatment and direct fetal treatment from the time of tachycardia diagnosis to death, neonatal hospital discharge or to a maximum of 30 days after birth.
Atrial Flutter, Tachycardia, Supraventricular, Tachycardia, Atrial Ectopic, Tachycardia, Reciprocating, Tachycardia Atrial, Tachycardia, Atrioventricular Nodal Reentry, Tachycardia, Paroxysmal, Fetal Hydrops
The Fetal Atrial Flutter and Supraventricular Tachycardia (FAST) Therapy Trial is a prospective multi-center trial that examines the efficacy and safety of standard prenatal antiarrhythmic treatment. Study components of FAST include three prospective sub-studies to determine the efficacy and safety of commonly used transplacental drug regimens in suppressing fetal AF without hydrops (Randomized Clinical Trial (RCT) A), SVT without hydrops (RCT B), and SVT with hydrops (RCT C). All RCTs are open label phase III trials of standard 1st line therapy, which either is started as monotherapy (no hydrops) or as dual therapy (hydrops).
Fetal Atrial Flutter Without Hydrops, Fetal Supraventricular Tachycardia Without Hydrops, Fetal Supraventricular Tachycardia With Hydrops
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most preventable cause of stroke. CHADS and CHA2DS2VASc scores predict the likelihood of stroke in patients with nonvalvular AF. Atrial flutter confers a similar risk of stroke as atrial fibrillation. Anticoagulant therapy with warfarin, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban is effective for prevention of thromboembolic stroke in most patients with AF. However, despite widely available risk stratification tools, five options for anticoagulation, and evidence-based practice guidelines, thromboprophylaxis for stroke prevention in AF is under-prescribed in the U.S., Europe, and worldwide. The investigators have previously demonstrated the efficacy of an alert-based computerized decision support (CDS) strategy for prevention of symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE) in at-risk hospitalized patients not receiving any thromboprophylaxis. The investigators' goal is to create and evaluate an alert-based CDS strategy for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular AF or atrial flutter in a randomized controlled trial.
Atrial Fibrillation, Stroke
Acute atrial fibrillation is the most common sustained, clinically significant dysrhythmia encountered in the emergency department (ED) and the most common dysrhythmia treated by emergency physicians. Atrial flutter is less common than atrial fibrillation but its management in the ED is very similar, and the majority of patients with atrial flutter also have atrial fibrillation. Symptomatic relief and ventricular rate control are generally the primary therapeutic objectives in the ED management of acute atrial fibrillation and flutter (AFF). The need for swift, appropriate action by the emergency physician is highlighted by the fact that up to 18% of patients with AFF develop potentially life-threatening complications such as congestive heart failure, hypotension, ventricular ectopy, respiratory failure, angina and myocardial infarction. Both beta-blocking agents and calcium channel blockers are commonly used to treat AFF in the ED. Metoprolol is the most commonly used beta-blocker; and diltiazem is the most frequently used calcium channel antagonist.\[8\] Diltiazem was released by the FDA for treatment of AFF in 1992. Shreck et al. were the first to demonstrate both the efficacy of diltiazem in the ED management of AFF with rapid rate and its clear superiority over the previously most commonly used pharmacologic agent, digoxin. To date, only one prospective, randomized trial has compared the effectiveness of a calcium channel blocker (diltiazem) with a beta-blocker (metoprolol) for rate control of AFF in the ED. Despite the relatively small sample size (n=20 in each group) the authors concluded that both pharmacologic agents were similarly effective. In order to test this finding, the investigators conducted a prospective comparison of metoprolol and diltiazem for the management of patients presenting to the ED with AFF with rapid ventricular rate.
Heart Rate and Rhythm Disorders
To demonstrate that ablation with the Therapy™ Cool Flex™ Irrigated Ablation System is effective in the treatment of typical atrial flutter (cavo-tricuspid dependent) and that its use does not result in an unacceptable risk of intra-procedural, serious cardiac adverse events.
Typical Atrial Flutter
To demonstrate that the use of Contact Therapy™ Cool Path™ ablation catheter in conjunction with the EnSite Velocity Contact Technology for the treatment of typical atrial flutter * Does not result into unacceptable risk of intra-procedural composite serious adverse events and, * Does not affect efficacy of the ablation procedure The study will also evaluate the
Typical Atrial Flutter
The purpose of the BLOCk-CTI study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Blazer® Open-Irrigated Ablation Catheter for the treatment of sustained or recurrent type 1 atrial flutter. This study will compare outcomes in patients treated with the Blazer® Open-Irrigated Ablation Catheter to outcomes in patients treated with open-irrigated radiofrequency ablation catheters that have received FDA market approval for the treatment of type 1 atrial flutter.
Atrial Flutter
The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that ablation with the Therapy™ Cool Path™ Duo cardiac ablation system can eliminate typical atrial flutter and that its use does not result in an unacceptable risk of serious adverse events (SAE's).
Typical Atrial Flutter
Irrigated catheter for ablation of isthmus-dependent atrial flutter
Atrial Flutter
This study will attempt to demonstrate the effectiveness of RSD1235 in the conversion of atrial flutter (AFL) to sinus rhythm.
Atrial Flutter
The primary objective is to provide additional corroborative safety and efficacy data for the Navistar Thermocool catheter for the treatment of subjects with typical atrial flutter (AFL).
Atrial Flutter
This study is designed to evaluate the safety, tolerability and preliminary efficacy of vernakalant (oral) in subjects with sustained atrial fibrillation of greater than 72 hours and less than 6 months duration
Atrial Fibrillation
To assess the efficacy of dronedarone versus placebo for the maintenance of normal sinus rhythm after electrical, pharmacological or spontaneous conversion of atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter (AF/AFL). To assess the efficacy of dronedarone versus placebo on ventricular rate control in case of AF/AFL recurrence. To assess the efficacy of dronedarone versus placebo on AF/AFL-related symptoms.
Atrial Fibrillation, Atrial Flutter
The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the effectiveness of RSD1235 compared with placebo, in the conversion of atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter to sinus rhythm.
Atrial Flutter, Atrial Fibrillation
This clinical investigation utilizes the Constellation Full Contact Mapping catheter in the left and right atria to explore atrial signal characteristics that can guide atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter ablation procedures more effectively.
Atrial Fibrillation or Atrial Flutter
Abnormal heart rhythms or arrhythmias are often managed by a procedure in which a catheter is introduced into the heart. These catheters can then cauterize abnormally functioning portions of the heart muscle with the hope of returning the heart to a more effective rhythm. In the process of performing such a procedure, called a catheter ablation, an operator must be able to accurately sense electrical activity displayed on computer screens in different parts of the heart, provide sufficient localized energy to the abnormally behaving tissue (ideally without damaging uninvolved heart structures), and accurately reassess the electrical activity of the heart to ensure the spot in the heart has been cauterized. When sensing electrical activity of the heart, specialized catheters produce recordings on a computer screen known as electrograms (EGM). To produce this recording conventional catheters commonly use a positive and negative electrode, from which the difference between the two provides the EGM. The distance between the two electrodes varies from device to device. The greater the distance between them, the less accurate the measurement of local electrical activity becomes. This may result in poorly localized or excessive use of energy that could be damaging to normal heart structures or put the patient at risk for the return or development of additional arrhythmias. The IntellaTip MiFi catheter has been constructed with a specialized sensing tip that uses "microelectrodes" that are relatively close in proximity (\<1 mm apart) with the hope of improving the sensing capability of the device. This study will analyze the signals obtained from this FDA-approved catheter in people undergoing a catheter ablation procedure. The study will examine signals after the procedure is finished and will not prolong or differ the process from a standard ablation procedure. The goal of this study is to determine the ability of the microelectrodes to distinguish ablated, or cauterized versus non-cauterized tissue.
Atrial Flutter, Arrhythmia
The purpose is to compare long term occurrence of atrial arrhythmias including atrial fibrillation (AF) and thromboembolic complications including cerebrovascular events (CVE) in patients with typical atrial flutter (AFLT) undergoing cavo-tricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation alone versus CTI ablation combined with pulmonary vein isolation (PVI).
Typical Atrial Flutter, Risk Factors With Future Development of Atrial Flutter
The purpose of this clinical study is to collect safety and performance data to support a demonstration of substantial equivalence of the Catheter Robotics Remote Catheter System to predicate devices when used to perform EP mapping of the right heart (atrium and ventricle).
Atrial Flutter, Ventricular Tachycardia
PRINCE is an international, multicentre, randomized controlled trial of posterior pericardiotomy in patients without a history of atrial fibrillation (AF) or flutter undergoing cardiac surgery.
Atrial Fibrillation, Atrial Flutter, Cardiac Events
The purpose of this prospective, randomized, double-blinded study is to further evaluate the safety and efficacy of varying doses of intravenous magnesium in the treatment of AFF RVR.
Tachycardia Atrial, Atrial Fibrillation, Atrial Flutter With Rapid Ventricular Response
Get With The Guidelines-Atrial Fibrillation is designed to assist hospital care teams in consistently providing the latest evidence-based treatment for their AFib patients. At the same time, it offers a means of monitoring the quality of AFib care in U.S. hospitals and building a database for continued research and further quality improvement.
Atrial Fibrillation, Atrial Flutter
The study is a prospective single-arm multicenter clinical trial. Adult patients will be consented and enrolled in an outpatient cardiology office or Arrhythmia Clinics.
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation, Atrial Flutter, Bradycardia, Tachycardia
The goal of this study is to understand the effects of early mobilization after a Z stitch procedure in patients undergoing certain heart-related treatments. The investigators want to find out if allowing patients to move around sooner after their procedure can improve their satisfaction and potentially lead to earlier discharge from the hospital. Type of Study: Clinical Trial Participant Population/Health Conditions: Patients aged 18-99 undergoing specific heart procedures such as atrial fibrillation treatment, atrial flutter treatment, supraventricular tachycardia treatment, diagnostic electrophysiology studies, AV node ablation, or Watchman device placement. Main Questions: Does early mobilization (getting up and moving around sooner) after the Z stitch procedure improve patient satisfaction? Participants will be divided into two groups, and researchers will compare those who have one hour of bedrest with those who have four hours of bedrest after the Z stitch procedure. The investigators want to see if the shorter bedrest period leads to higher patient satisfaction.
Atrial Fibrillation, Atrial Flutter, Supraventricular Tachycardia, Syncope, Ventricular Tachycardia
The purpose of this pragmatic study is to evaluate the safety, performance and effectiveness of the VARIPULSE catheter technology used in combination with the TRUPULSE™ Generator, and the compatible EAM system (Carto 3D) to treat patients with atrial fibrillation and related arrhythmias during clinically-indicated ablation procedures.
Atrial Fibrillation, Paroxysmal or Persistent, Atrial Fibrillation and Flutter, Atrial Flutter Typical