Search clinical trials by condition, location and status
A multicenter, prospective, controlled clinical trial evaluating the efficacy of a single layer placental-based allograft and standard of care in the management of nonhealing diabetic foot ulcers.
This study will evaluate Matrion™ (LifeNet Health, Inc., Virginia Beach, VA), a placental membrane product, as a treatment for diabetic foot ulcers compared to conventional wound care. Matrion is derived from donated human birth tissue and includes both the amniotic and chorionic layers, along with the trophoblast layer. It is minimally processed using a proprietary decellularization method and terminally sterilized to ensure the membrane is acellular and sterile, making it suitable for surgical applications.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of human placental membrane products and standard of care versus standard of care alone in the management of nonhealing diabetic foot ulcers and venous leg ulcers.
The goal of this study is to determine the between-arm difference in the proportion of subjects achieving complete closure of nonhealing diabetic foot ulcers with multiple CAMPs plus SOC versus matched controls over 12 weeks using a modified platform trial design.
This is a prospective case series evaluating the efficacy and safety of NeoThelium FT Amnion Skin Graft in the Mangement of Diabetic Foot Ulcers
The purpose of this study is to determine how well our dHPT (Dehydrated Human Placental Tissue) Product and Standard of Care work when compared to Standard of Care alone in achieving complete closure of diabetic foot.
This study is a prospective, randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate the effectiveness of Miro3D Wound Matrix plus Standard of Care (SOC) compared to SOC alone in treating Wagner Grade 1 diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) and wound dehiscence in an outpatient setting. The trial is sponsored by Reprise Biomedical, Inc. and aims to explore whether the addition of Miro3D-a three-dimensional, acellular porcine-derived wound matrix-enhances wound healing outcomes compared to SOC alone. Purpose of the Study: The primary purpose of the study is to determine whether applying Miro3D in combination with SOC leads to improved healing of diabetic foot ulcers compared to SOC alone. Specifically, the study seeks to assess early wound healing progress at four weeks (as measured by percent area reduction and granulation tissue formation) as a predictor of complete healing by twelve weeks. Key Question the Study Seeks to Answer: Does the addition of Miro3D to standard wound care improve the healing rate and overall wound outcomes for patients with Wagner Grade 1 diabetic foot ulcers or dehisced wounds compared to standard care alone? Study Design Overview: Subjects who meet inclusion/exclusion criteria will be randomized into one of two groups: 1. Miro3D + SOC arm - receiving Miro3D weekly for 4 weeks, then biweekly if needed, for up to 12 weeks. 2. SOC alone (control) arm - receiving SOC without Miro3D. If the wound remains unhealed at 12 weeks in the SOC alone arm, participants may "crossover" to receive Miro3D treatment under the same schedule for an additional 12 weeks. Primary Endpoint: 1. Percent Area Reduction (PAR) and granulation tissue formation at 4 weeks, serving as predictors for wound healing at 12 weeks. Secondary Endpoints: 1. Quality of Life (QOL) improvements, including pain, mobility, and emotional well-being, assessed using a validated Wound/Ulcer-QOL tool. 2. Pain levels using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at each visit. Population: Approximately 30 adult subjects (15 per arm) with Wagner Grade 1 diabetic foot ulcers or dehisced wounds will be enrolled. Subjects must have adequate blood flow, demonstrate wound size criteria, and commit to offloading and follow-up care. Follow-Up: Subjects will be followed weekly through the 12-week study period. Healed subjects will undergo confirmation visits at 2 and 4 weeks post-closure. Subjects in the crossover arm will be followed for an additional 12 weeks if their wound was unhealed at the primary endpoint. Statistical Considerations: Data will be summarized using descriptive statistics, including wound measurements, infection status, and healing rates. Comparative analysis will be conducted between treatment groups and schedules (weekly vs. biweekly Miro3D application). Adverse events (AEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), and device-related events will also be documented. This study aims to generate clinical evidence supporting the use of Miro3D as a beneficial adjunct to standard wound care in promoting early and complete healing of diabetic foot ulcers.
The study will evaluate the treatment effect of MDI-1228-mesylate Gel compared with standard of care alone for the complete healing rate at the end of 12 weeks in participants with diabetic foot ulcers (targeted ulcer). In addition, the proportion of subjects whose target ulcer area is reduced by 50% after 12 weeks of treatment.
The goal of this investigational study is to evaluate the safety and clinical performance of Tropocells Autologous Platelet-rich Fibrin (PRF) for wound care for both males and females, ages 18-80 years old, with Grade 1 and 2, mild to moderate, neuroischemic diabetic chronic foot ulcers in subjects with Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. The main question\[s\] it aims to answer \[is/are\]: Measure 1: Wound Closure with Tropocells Autologous PRF System for DFU Measure 2: Safety of Tropocells Autologous PRF System for DFU Researchers will enroll to acquire approximately 30 evaluable subjects with no comparison group. Run-In Phase (2 weeks): participants with chronic diabetic foot wounds will undergo a 2-week run in phase presenting to the clinic for weekly visits, for standard of care. Active Treatment Phase (12 weeks): participants that do not show a reduction of at least 20% may be qualified to advance to the active treatment phase where wounds will be evaluated and treated weekly in the research clinic to receive standard of care with Tropocells Autologous PRF System. Follow-up Phase (1 month and 3 months): participants with wounds that losed during the Active Treatment Phase ( 100% wound closure with two weekly assessments demonstrating persistent closure) will be advanced to the follow-up phase to show if the wound remains closed at 1 month and 3 months.
The main purpose of this research study is to compare the proportion of wound closure in subjects that receive E-GRAFT™ with Standard of Care (SOC) versus FIBRACOL™ with SOC. Other research purposes include the following: * Rate of wound closure * Change in ulcer size over 12 weeks * Any adverse events or reactions (side effects) * Changes in neuropathy (nerve damage) * Change in pain levels * Occurrence of infection