Search clinical trials by condition, location and status
This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of an oral methylprednisolone taper in reducing postoperative pain, opioid consumption, and nausea following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
This study is researching an experimental drug called REGN7508 (called "study drug"). The study is focused on adults undergoing elective, unilateral (one side) total knee replacement surgery. The aim of the study is to see how effective the study drug is at preventing venous thromboembolism (VTE) and other related diseases after total knee replacement surgery. The study is looking at several other research questions, including: * What side effects may happen from taking the study drug * How much study drug is in the blood at different times * Whether the body makes antibodies against the study drug (which could make the study drug less effective or could lead to side effects)
This study will evaluate the ability of trigger point injections completed immediately following a total knee arthroplasty decrease pain scores and opioid use compared to sham injections. Given the current state of opioid dependency in the United States there needs to be a more focused attempt at treating post-operative pain without use of opioids. Given the manipulation of soft tissue during a total knee arthroplasty there seems to be a high correlation with pain and myofascial pain syndrome. This study will include an experimental (trigger point injection) and control (sham injection) group who are all undergoing a total knee arthroplasty. This is a pilot study that will include a maximum of 100 total patients (although it is planned for the study to be much smaller with a planned 10-15 patients per group). The procedure that will be completed is a trigger point injection with use of 1% lidocaine without epinephrine along the distal aspect of the vastus medialis and lateralis, proximal aspect of the medial and lateral gastrocnemius muscle bellies. The sham injection will be completed by pressing the needle against the skin without injecting any fluid. There will be a "blind" between the patient and the needle with both arms of the study. These patients will be followed up on POD1, and during weeks 2 and 6 follow-up where they will be given questionnaires to assess pain (visual analogue scale) and opioid use, and asked to bring their opioid medications to the clinic to assess the morphine milligrams equivalent (MME).
Patients experience dramatic quadriceps strength loss after total knee replacement, which contributes to persistent weakness and reduced long-term function after surgery. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) reduces quadriceps weakness and improves patient function after knee replacement, but it is drastically underused in rehabilitation practice. This randomized trial will examine the effectiveness and feasibility of a comprehensive strategy for implementing neuromuscular electrical stimulation after knee replacement in two large healthcare organizations.
The goal of this observational study is to learn about patients' recoveries after receiving total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The main questions it aims to answer are: Does robotic-assisted TKA have improved perceived recovery when compared to conventional TKA? Does robotic-assisted TKA lead to improved functional recovery when compared to conventional TKA? Researchers will compare if robotic-assisted versus conventional procedures lead to different recovery speeds. Participants will answer questionnaires and undergo physical therapy testing before and at several timepoints after their procedure.
This is a single-center pilot study to determine if an adductor canal continuous nerve block is superior to single injection nerve block following total knee arthroplasty. Investigators will randomize participants to either continuous nerve block or single injection nerve block for the adductor canal preoperatively. They will assess differences in pain (measured in numeric rating scale), opioid consumption, and physical therapy milestones from postoperative day 0 to 7.
The purpose of this study is to examine femur bone mineral density (BMD) change before and after surgery in patients receiving cemented or cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA). performed with manual or robotic methods. 100 participants will be enrolled and can expect to be on study for up to 14 months.
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the efficacy of intravenous (IV) and intraosseous (IO) antibiotic administration techniques during primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in adults undergoing a TKA procedure at Houston Methodist Hospital. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does IO administration of vancomycin and cefazolin protect against perioperative exposure risks? Is there a difference in post-operative complication rates between IV and IO administration of these drugs? Participants will be randomized to receive either the standard of care IV administration of Vancomycin and Cefazolin, or the IO administration of Vancomycin and Cefazolin.
Knee replacement surgery can be performed in one of two ways. Traditionally the goal was for the new joint to be in a neutral position with respect to the femur (thigh bone). This is called Mechanical Alignment (MA). The neutral position is different than the human knee's natural position, so MA often requires the surgeon to make additional cuts to the ligaments and other soft tissue around the knee. More recently surgeons have started to place the new joint in a position that more closely replicates the natural alignment of the human knee. This is called Kinemetic Alignment (KA). KA can be done without additional soft tissue dissection but the procedure requires a higher level of precision that can be difficult to achieve in every case. Some studies have found no difference in outcomes between MA and KA, whereas others have found KA to be superior. But these were small studies or studies that did not consider patient-rated outcomes.
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if preparing the target alignment of the operative side in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) based on the non-arthritic side will give the patient better overall alignment, function, and improved results compared to basing our implant alignment and positioning off the arthritic side, which is currently the traditional method. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Will a patient have improved postoperative TKA results if the implant alignment is based off the non-arthritic side compared to the standard arthritic side? * What are the similarities or differences between study arms with respect to final implant alignment and positioning angles? Researchers will compare the outcomes of two cohorts of patients undergoing primary robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) with normal contralateral knee. Based on preoperative CT imaging, the researchers will use normal contralateral side joint numbers as the target alignment for one group (Experimental arm) and utilize the traditional method for the other group (Active comparator arm). Clinical outcomes and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) will be compared between groups. Participants will: * Be randomized into one of two study arms and will receive either a unilateral knee CT or bilateral knee CT preoperatively * Follow-up in the clinic at 2 weeks, 6 weeks and 1-year postoperatively, per standard-of-care for x-ray and clinical evaluation. * Complete postop questionnaires (PROMs) at the prescribed follow-up intervals