Search clinical trials by condition, location and status
Adolescent (ages 10-19) overdose deaths are the third leading cause of pediatric death and continue to rise in the United States. Healthcare providers have regular and trusted relationships with youth and have experience in providing public health injury prevention counseling. Youth have different motivations for using drugs, and many who experience fatal overdose do not have a history of opioid use. Primary care pediatric providers regularly provide developmentally appropriate injury prevention counseling for leading causes of pediatric fatal and nonfatal injury such as drowning prevention and firearms safety. However, there are no recommended, evidence-based overdose prevention interventions for youth, including in health care settings, even though research supports pediatricians and youth-serving clinicians providing harm reduction strategies such as naloxone distribution and overdose education. Among adults, overdose prevention education reduces overdose, is cost-effective, and can be learned by laypersons. Content commonly includes awareness of fentanyl in the drug supply, risk reduction (e.g., not using alone, risks of polysubstance use), and how to recognize and respond to an overdose, including the use of naloxone. This study is a pilot two-arm cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT) of a brief overdose prevention education intervention that will be developed in collaboration with the Community Advisory Board (CAB). The primary outcome of this study is to assess the feasibility and acceptability of the brief youth overdose prevention intervention as measured by provider feasibility and acceptability as well as youth acceptability.
A hybrid type 1 study will be conducted to evaluate efficacy and preliminary implementation considerations for a novel intervention to promote uptake of drug checking services (DCS) and safer drug use behaviors among people who use drugs (PWUD) to reduce incidence of overdose (OD) and HIV and Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections in San Diego County. Along with \~50 other syringe services programs (SSPs) in the US, the Harm Reduction Coalition San Diego (HRCSD), a local SSP, recently launched CheckSD (San Diego), a DCS using test strips (TS) and Fourier Transform Infrared Spectrometry (FTIR) that allows people to submit drug samples with non-nominal identifiers and obtain personalized results. While most existing DCS using FTIR offer some counseling, no theory-based interventions to increase DCS uptake and promote post-DCS adoption of safer drug use behaviors have been rigorously evaluated
Oregon's decision makers (e.g., community service providers, public health, justice, advocacy groups, payers) are calling for comprehensive, current, and trusted data to inform how they allocate resources to improve substance use services and mitigate the growing opioid and methamphetamine epidemics in their state. Consistent with the HEAL Data2Action call for Innovation projects that drive action with data in real-world settings, this study will refine and test the impact of a novel implementation strategy to engage cross- sector decision makers and make data that they identify as relevant to their decisions available to them in easy- to-use products. The proposed study aims to not only address critical knowledge gaps regarding how and when data can inform impactful, transparent decision-making, but to provide decision makers with the data that they need to achieve community-wide substance use prevention and treatment goals, including the increased delivery of high-quality, evidence-informed, services and the prevention of overdoses.
This clinical trial aims to evaluate the pilot implementation of a machine-learning (ML)-driven clinical decision support (CDS) tool designed to predict opioid overdose risk within the electronic health record (EHR) system at UF Health Internal Medicine and Family Medicine clinics in Gainesville, Florida. The study will use a pre- versus post-implementation design to compare outcomes within clinics, focusing on measures such as naloxone prescribing rates and opioid overdose occurrences. Researchers will also assess the usability, acceptability, and feasibility of the CDS tool through qualitative interviews with primary care clinicians (PCPs) in the participating clinics.
The goal of this cluster randomized clinical trial is to test a clinician-targeted behavioral nudge intervention in the Electronic Health Record (EHR) for patients who are identified by a machine-learning based risk prediction model as having an elevated risk for an opioid overdose. The clinical trial will evaluate the effectiveness of providing a flag in the EHR to identify individuals at elevated risk with and without behavioral nudges/best practice alerts (BPAs) as compared to usual care by primary care clinicians. The primary goals of the study are to improve opioid prescribing safety and reduce overdose risk.
The study is a quasi-experimental investigation of a sub-acute stabilization center (SASC) for people who have had or are at risk for having an opioid overdose and have an encounter with Seattle Fire Department emergency medical services (EMS) in Seattle, WA. Those transported to the SASC are the intervention participants and two comparison groups will be utilized: eligible Seattle EMS patients who opt not to go to the SASC and King County residents, outside of Seattle, who meet the same eligibility criteria. A comparative interrupted time series analysis is planned to study the main effectiveness outcomes. Seattle Fire EMS will assess, refer, and arrange transport for participants to the SASC. The SASC will offer an array of services including post-overdose monitoring, utilization of buprenorphine and methadone for the treatment opioid use disorder and opioid withdrawal, linkage to ongoing care for OUD, and provision of harm reduction services and supplies. The length of stay in the SASC will be limited to less than 24 hours. A continuous process improvement (CPI) approach will monitor and refine the intervention. Characterization of the interventions will be based upon analysis of service utilization patterns over time along with interviews and surveys with stakeholders.
The goal of this clinical trial is to see if an injectable medicine called naltrexone can prevent fentanyl overdose deaths in people who use other drugs (cocaine, methamphetamine). The main questions it aims to answer are: What are the challenges for implementing naltrexone as an overdose prevention strategy? Are injections of naltrexone effective for opioid overdose prevention among people who use stimulants? How often are people who use stimulants and do not intentionally use opioids unintentionally exposed to opioids? Researchers will compare participants to receive the study medication to the usual care group to see if one group experiences fewer opioid overdose events than the other. Participants will be randomized to either receive a monthly injection of naltrexone over six months, or receive usual care. Usual care includes harm reduction supplies. Laboratory procedures will include the collection of urine, blood, and hair samples for various safety and outcome measure testing.
The study aims to adapt an existing Cultural Structural Humility (CSH) training into a video format for peer recovery coaches (PRCs) and refine an AI-driven texting tool to reinforce the training. After refining these tools using user-centered design, a pilot test will be conducted to assess their impact on the uptake of opioid treatment and social services. The study will also evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of the intervention to inform future large-scale trials.
The purpose of this study is to test a social intervention focused on overdose prevention and care. In the investigators prior work, the investigators have shown that people who use opioids (PWUO) can be effective peer educators (PEs).
The investigators aim to test the effectiveness of a high maintenance daily dose of buprenorphine (24 mg) for improving outcomes among patients who used fentanyl compared to the standard daily dose (16 mg). The main question it aims to answer is: will patients who are randomly assigned to the high 24 mg maintenance dose, as compared to patients randomly assigned to the standard 16 mg maintenance dose, have improved retention in buprenorphine treatment (primary outcome), improved treatment response based on use of non-prescribed opioids (secondary outcome), decreased opioid cravings (secondary outcome), and decreased risk of fatal and non-fatal opioid overdose (exploratory outcome).