Search clinical trials by condition, location and status
The purpose of this study is to learn how people with BRCA1/2 mutations respond to genetic risk modifier testing. The researchers will learn more about how people make choices about their health care, including about methods to screen for prostate cancer. Researchers are also doing this study to learn about how the genetic risk modifier test affects people's thoughts and feelings.
This will be a prospectively maintained research database. The purpose is to record baseline parameters and treatment outcomes following of Cryotherapy for ablation of clinically localized prostate cancer.
This is a Phase I/II trial evaluating the effectiveness of adding neoadjuvant HDR-B prior to RALP for HR-PCa patients with selective AAB for decipher high risk or pathologically node positive patients. Patients with newly diagnosed, histologically confirmed, non-metastatic, HR-PCa who are scheduled to receive RALP will be eligible to participate in the study.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the overall survival (length of time from the start of study to date of death from any cause) for pasritamig (JNJ-78278343) in combination with best supportive care (BSC) as compared to placebo with BSC in participants with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC; a stage of cancer that has spread beyond the prostate gland and is no longer responding to hormone therapies).
The researchers are doing this study to find out whether tarlatamab is an effective treatment for Delta-like Protein 3 (DLL3)-positive prostate cancer that has spread to other parts of your body (metastasized) and has either come back after treatment (relapsed) or not responded to treatment (refractory).
The purpose of this research study is to assess whether inhibiting nerve activity to the prostate delays progression of disease in men with high-risk clinical features for prostate cancer. Prostate cancer has been shown to invade nerves, a mechanism that is thought to be involved in prostate cancer spread in men with high-risk cancer. When nerve activity to the prostate is blocked in mice with prostate cancer, prostate cancer growth and spread are inhibited. In a previous study we showed that doing so in humans was safe and may have anticancer therapeutic effect. In this study we will test whether one versus two injections of nerve blocking agent is more effective at reducing nerves in the prostate and whether it will slow/stop spread of prostate cancer after treatment.
The purpose of this study is to learn about how long apalutamide and enzalutamide are taken by men to treat mCSPC. Prostate cancer is one of the most common cancers in men. The prostate is a gland in the male body that helps make semen. Metastatic cancer is a cancer that has spread to other parts of the body. Castration-sensitive prostate cancer means the cancer is being controlled by keeping the testosterone levels as low as would be expected if the testicles were removed by surgery. This is a real-world study, not a clinical study. This means that researchers will look at what happens when men receive the treatments prescribed by their own doctor as part of their usual healthcare treatment. In this study, researchers will use information from cancer clinics (Flatiron Health electronic health records). The study will include patients' information from the database for men who: * Were identified to have mCSPC. * Started treatment with apalutamide or enzalutamide (index date) for mCSPC. * Were 18 years of age or older on the index date. Men in this study will be taking apalutamide or enzalutamide for treatment of their mCSPC. The study will compare how long men take apalutamide or enzalutamide. This study will use patient information from cancer clinics. Information from start of apalutamide or enzalutamide treatment until information is available in the database will be used to describe how long patients receive treatment.
This study will enroll participants who are undergoing an MRI before a prostate biopsy due to suspected prostate cancer. The purpose of this study is to see if the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) helps detect lesions on an MRI better than a radiologist not using AI. The AI Rad Companion (AIRC) Prostate MRI application is a software that uses measurements of the prostate and will be utilized in this study to help detect potential cancerous lesions. The AI software will assign the lesions a PI-RADS score, which is a way to measure the chance of the lesion being cancer. There are two parts to this study. The first part involves comparing the interpretation of prostate MRI images by a radiologist alone, a radiologist aided by AI, and AI alone. A systematic biopsy will be completed per standard of care. The radiologist may opt to include up to 2 additional AI-identified targets to biopsy in addition to those biopsied for standard of care. The second part of the study involves utilizing the MRI images from the first part of the study in addition to retrospective prostate MRI images. These de-identified images, along with Prostate Image Quality (PI-QUAL) scores, clinical data, and biopsy results will be sent to Siemens in order to aid in the development of methods to identify good or bad image quality in prostate MRI images.
The purpose of this study is to identify the recommended phase 2 combination dose (RP2CD) of JNJ-78278343 in combination with JNJ-95298177 in Part 1 (Dose confirmation) of the study and to determine how safe and tolerable the RP2CD is for treatment of participants with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC; a stage of prostate cancer where the cancer has spread beyond the prostate and is resistant to hormonal therapy) in Part 2 (Dose expansion) of study.
Single-arm, prospective registry study assessing changes in acute patient-reported urinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) quality of life at the 24-month post-treatment time point following magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided or computed tomography (CT)-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) delivered to the prostate bed +/- pelvic lymph nodes. The decision to offer an adaptive treatment will be at the clinician's discretion.