Search clinical trials by condition, location and status
The investigation is an early feasibility study in up to 5 subjects, in which the primary objective is to capture preliminary safety and effectiveness information on the Magnetic Bead Tracking system.
The investigators will test the following hypothesis: Use of Glide results in improved functional performance, satisfaction, and usage metrics as compared to use of a standard Direct Control (DC) prosthesis. This study will compare the use of Glide \[Experimental\] prosthesis with a DC \[Standard\] prosthesis in a clinical setting and in unsupervised daily activity. We will follow a multiple baseline design, specifically an AB design. Each of the subjects will use the Experimental and Standard systems over a total of 24-weeks. The A phase is the baseline phase where the DC prosthesis will be used, and the B phase will be the treatment phase where the Glide prosthesis will be used. Participants will undergo an A phase of either 10-weeks, 12-weeks, or 14-weeks duration, with the remaining 14-, 12-, or 10-weeks of the study being dedicated to the B phase.
The e-OPRA Implant System, is a further development of the OPRA (Osseointegrated Prostheses for the Rehabilitation of Amputees) Implant System. The e-OPRA Implant system is an implant system for direct skeletal anchorage of amputation prostheses. The added feature in the e-OPRA Implant system, is a bidirectional interface into the human body that allows permanent and reliable communication using implanted electrodes. These electrodes will provide long-term stable bioelectric signals for an improved control of the prosthetic limb. The Magnetic Bead Tracking System, which will be implanted and used in combination with the e-OPRA Implant system, is an investigational device that consists of pairs of magnetic beads, and a set of magnetic field sensors that measure and track the length of muscles and the speed at which they move in real-time. When the beads are implanted in muscle in the residual limb of an amputee, the muscle length signal is communicated to an investigational, robotic ankle-foot prosthesis. The purpose of the study is to evaluate the feasibility of a transtibial amputee with the e-OPRA Implant System and Magnetic Bead Tracking System exhibiting full neural control over a neuro-mechanical prosthetic system. A maximum of seven subjects will be enrolled. Each subject will undergo one or more surgeries where the e-OPRA Implant System and Magnetic Bead Tracking System will be implanted. The subjects will participate in follow-up sessions the last of which occurs approximately 24 months after the surgery. This is a prospective, non-randomized, uncontrolled study.
People with lower extremity amputation (LEA) have persistent problems with balance, falls, residual limb pain, functional mobility, cognitive attention during gait, and satisfaction with participation in daily activities, despite using prostheses. The purpose of this randomized clinical trial is to advance understanding of how dynamic foot design features may help people with LEA This study will include people with above-knee amputations, or with bilateral amputations, or with below-knee amputations and lower levels of mobility. The main study questions/goals are: 1a) To determine if frontal plane adaptation in a foot prosthesis impacts performance, comfort, activities of daily living, and community mobility in the study populations. To answer this question, we will compare a locked and unlocked version of the novel prosthesis. 1b) To determine how the unlocked investigational foot condition compares to the person's usual foot using the outcomes listed above. 2) To examine the participants' lived experience during community activities. The study will use performance tests, questionnaires, logbooks, and interviews to monitor person-centered outcomes and perceptions of personal functioning during the use of the investigational foot (locked and unlocked) compared to the person's usual foot.
The purpose of this study is to characterize proprioceptive sensations in the missing limb of upper limb amputees using nerve stimulation, and to develop advanced controllers for moving a prosthesis. Proprioceptive sensations are the sensations that tell individuals where their hand is in space, and if it is moving. The research team uses Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES), which involves applying small electric currents to the nerves. These signals are then transferred to the brain just like the information about the individual's intact hand used to be transferred to their brain. This study will test different placements for stimulation and determine which one(s) provide the individual with proprioceptive sensations. The investigators want to know what the participants feel and if the investigators can use proprioceptive sensation to give the participants information about limb movement and position.
The goal of this study is to determine whether or not the use of a penile traction therapy device known as RestoreX prior to implantation of a penile prosthesis can increase the length of the implant used during surgery. The device used in this study is commercially available and has been used successfully to facilitate penile lengthening in patients with diabetes and after a certain type of prostate surgery. Use of the device has not been shown to have any detrimental effects on sexual or overall health.
This clinical trial evaluates whether a three-dimensional (3D)-printed external breast prosthesis improves patient-reported outcomes (PRO) among breast cancer patients that underwent surgical removal of the breast (mastectomy) without surgical reconstruction. Breast cancer remains a significant health concern and often requires a mastectomy. While breast reconstruction is a common option following a mastectomy, some patients decide not to undergo it or are not candidates. An external breast prosthesis is worn on the outside of the body to replace the breast that was removed during the mastectomy. Traditional external breast prostheses may lack comfort and fit. A 3D-printed external breast prosthesis is customized to the patient using 3D imaging along with computer-aided design (CAD) to interpret the 3D imaging to develop and print a patient-specific external breast prosthesis. This may create a better fitting prosthesis which may improve PRO.
Patients that undergo decompressive craniectomy are at risk of delayed changes in brain function known as "Sunken Flap Syndrome" or "Syndrome of the Trephined." The goal of this clinical trial is to see if placing a prosthetic over patients' skull defects can prevent "Sunken Flap Syndrome." The main questions are: 1. Can placing a prosthetic device over patients' skull defects prevent Sunken Flap Syndrome? 2. Can placing a prosthetic device over patients' skull defects decrease healthcare costs? 3. Can placing a prosthetic device over patients' skull defects improve recovery and return of brain function after decompressive craniectomy? Patients that experience traumatic brain injuries, brain bleeds, and large strokes can build up high levels of pressure in the skull. When this pressure can't be controlled with medications, a life-saving surgery called a decompressive hemicraniectomy (DC) is often performed. In this surgery, a large portion of the patient's skull is removed to decrease pressure on the brain and decrease permanent damage. After this surgery, many patients experience sinking of the brain in the skull as the pressure inside the head improves. The skull normally protects the brain from the outside environment. When large parts of the skull are removed, the brain is not able to regulate itself normally. This can lead to a number of problems, such as headaches, weakness, seizures, and even coma and permanent brain damage. This is referred to as "Sunken Flap Syndrome" (SFS) or "Syndrome of the Trephined" (SoT). After 3-6 months, patients can have the missing skull surgically repaired, which improves and sometimes fixes SFS, but the damage is sometimes too severe to be reversed. There are reports of patients with SFS treated with custom-made prosthetics that cover the missing piece of skull. In this study, the researchers want to see if wearing a custom-made prosthetic can prevent patients from experiencing SFS. Patients will also receive additional non-invasive measurement to see if the prosthetic can improve brain function and recovery. Finally, the researchers want to know if the prosthetic is cost-effective by decreasing the frequency that patients see doctors or receive care to treat SFS. Patients or the patient's medical decision makers will be asked if the patient wants to participate in the study after DC. If the patient or decision maker agrees to participate, the patient will be also asked if the patient wants to wear the prosthetic. The prosthetic is made of a common material used in other facial prosthetics. Patients that agree to wear the prosthetic will have a custom plate made for the participant. All patients will receive the same post-operative care and appointments whether or not the prosthetic is worn. The participant will go to the normally scheduled post-operative doctor's appointments at 2 and 4 weeks after initial DC surgery. Patient's that agree to wear the prosthetic will receive it at the 4-week post-DC appointment. The participant will then be asked to wear it as much as possible, but to let the researchers know if the participant experiences any pain, itching, discomfort or other problems. All patients will also be seen by the patient's physician before and after and after skull repair. At all appointments, patients will receive non-invasive testing of brain function. Recovery and rate of SFS will be compared between patients that do and do not wear the prosthetic. Participants will: * Go to the normally scheduled 2 and 4 week post-DC appointments * Go to the normally scheduled pre- and post-skull repair appointments * Receive additional non-invasive brain health testing at each appointment Participants that agree to wear a prosthetic will: * Receive the custom prosthetic at the 4-week post-DC appointment * Wear the prosthetic as much as possible, including at night * Take a brief survey about the prosthetic at the post-skull repair appointment
Individuals with an above-knee lower limb amputation are known to walk more slowly, expend more energy, have a greater risk of falling, and have reduced quality of life compared to individuals without amputation and those with below knee amputation. One of the driving factors behind these deficits is the lack of active function provided by above-knee prostheses with prosthetic knees and ankles. While many prosthetic devices have been developed for functional restoration after major lower extremity amputation, there remains no stable interface to facilitate reliable, long-term volitional control of an advanced robotic limb capable moving multiple joints. Moreover, there is no existing interface that provides useful sensory feedback that in turn enhances the functional capabilities of the prosthesis. To achieve both greater signal specificity and long-term signal stability, we have developed a biologic interface known as the Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface (RPNI). An RPNI consists of a peripheral nerve that is implanted into a free muscle graft that would otherwise go unused in the residual limb. As the nerve grows, it reinnervates the free muscle graft which undergoes a predictable sequence of revascularization and regeneration. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Can the amplitude, movement specificity and stability of sciatic nerve RPNI electromyography (EMG) signals be detected up to one year post RPNI surgery? 2. Do RPNIs contain information to enable control of a physical motorized prosthetic leg with multiple degrees of freedom? 3. Does stimulation of sciatic nerve RPNIs provides meaningful sensory feedback? Consenting participants with unilateral transfemoral amputation (TFA) will: 1. Undergo RPNI surgery and electrode implantation in the residual limb. 2. Attend regular follow-up visits following surgery to assess the health and signal strength of the RPNIs and their ability to use a prescribed prosthesis between 3- and 12-months following implantation. 3. Undergo explantation of electrodes following the conclusion of data collection.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate functional mobility, control, and user satisfaction from persons who have an amputation above the knee and have received osseo-integration (OI) and targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) surgery, while walking with a powered knee and ankle prosthesis.