Search clinical trials by condition, location and status
This clinical trial studies whether a biomarker platform, the Virtual Nodule Clinic, can be used for the management of lung (pulmonary) nodules that are not clearly non-cancerous (benign) or clearly cancerous (malignant) (indeterminate pulmonary nodules \[IPNs\]). The management of IPNs is based on estimating the likelihood that the observed nodule is malignant. Many things, such as age, smoking history, and current symptoms, are considered when making a prediction of the likelihood of malignancy. Radiographic imaging characteristics are also considered. Lung nodule management for IPNs can result in unnecessary invasive procedures for nodules that are ultimately determined to be benign, or potential delays in treatment when results of tests cannot be determined or are falsely negative. The Virtual Nodule Clinic is an artificial intelligence (AI) based imaging software within the electronic health record which makes certain that identified pulmonary nodules are screened by clinicians with expertise in nodule management. The Virtual Nodule Clinic also features an AI based radiomic prediction score which designates the likelihood that a pulmonary nodule is malignant. This may improve the ability to manage IPNs and lower unnecessary invasive procedures or treatment delays. Using the Virtual Nodule Clinic may work better for the management of IPNs.
chest x-rays will be analyzed by AI software for a secondary read of lung nodules. Chest x-rays will either be sent to the AI tool to be read or to radiologists to read. If the image is sent to the AI tool, the AI software will generate a report on if it detects a lung nodule or not. The image will then be sent to a radiologist to determine if there is agreement or disagreement with the AI tool.
The goal of this observational study is to learn how a physician uses the results of the Percepta® Nasal Swab test to manage people with a newly identified pulmonary nodule. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Does the use of the Percepta Nasal swab test reduce the number of invasive procedures in people with a low-risk result and whose nodule is benign? * Does the use of the Percepta Nasal swab test decrease the time to treatment in people with a high-risk result and whose nodule is cancer? Participants will be randomly assigned to either a group where the test result is provided to the physician (test arm) or to a group where the test result is not provided (control arm). Researchers will compare management of participants in the two groups.
This is a prospective, multicenter observational study aim at estimating the potential clinical utility of the CBM and at establishing the SOPs and protocols for a future randomized control trial.
This is a pragmatic clinical trial that will study the effect of a radiomics-based computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) tool on clinicians' management of pulmonary nodules (PNs) compared to usual care. Adults aged 35-89 years with 8-30mm PNs evaluated at Penn Medicine PN clinics will undergo 1:1 randomization to one of two groups, defined by the PN malignancy risk stratification strategy used by evaluating clinicians: 1) usual care or 2) usual care + use of a radiomics-based CAD tool.
The primary objective of this pilot observational study is to evaluate the accrual and retention rate of a study population from a centralized lung cancer screening program to support MRI and blood-based biomarker research for lung cancer screening.
The overall goal is to evaluate the role of a Virtual Navigation (VN) system (the Virtual Navigator) in the bronchoscopic evaluation and tissue sampling of lung cancer and other chest lesions at the Penn State Hershey Medical Center (HMC). The Virtual Navigator is a software package that runs on a mobile Windows-based computer. The computer takes in up to four clinical image/video sources, ordered by the clinician for clinical purposes: 1) 3D CT (computed tomography) imaging scan; 2) 3D PET (positron emission tomography) imaging scan (optional); 3) Bronchoscopic video of the airway tree interior; 4) Ultrasound video of scanned anatomy outside the airways, as provided by an endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) probe (optional). During a live guided procedure, the Virtual Navigator presents images that assist with navigating the bronchoscope to predesignated chest lesions. Lung cancer patients that present a suspicious peripheral tumor on their chest CT scan are often prescribed to undergo a diagnosis-and-staging bronchoscopy, whereby the bronchoscopist examines both the suspect tumor and any identified central-chest lymph nodes. For the clinical study, we consider bronchoscopy performance for two cohorts: 1) a cohort of consented patients who undergo image-guided bronchoscopy via the Virtual Navigator; and 2) a historical controls cohort consisting of patients who underwent bronchoscopy recently at our medical center (state-of-the-art bronchoscopy practice). The study's general hypothesis is that an image-guided bronchoscopy system (the Virtual Navigator) that integrates 3D imaging, bronchoscopy, and EBUS images enables more complete evaluation and sampling of chest lesions than current state-of-the-art clinical techniques. More specifically, for peripheral-tumor diagnosis, the sub-hypothesis is that the VN system increases diagnostic biopsy yield as compared to state-of-the-art bronchoscopy practice; for central-chest nodal staging, the sub-hypothesis is that the VN system enables the sampling of more lymph nodes than state-of-the-art bronchoscopy practice.
The goal of this study is to determine if cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is a viable alternative imaging guidance modality for percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy (PTNB) in a community hospital-based practice, and to determine the incidence of CBCT PTNB-associated pneumothorax compared to multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) guided PTNB biopsy. The standard of care in this facility is MDCT guided PTNB biopsy. The experimental arm of this study is CBCT-guided PTNB biopsy. This prospective study will identify patients planned for PTNB. Thereafter, data on lesion characteristics, imaging findings, and clinical history will be collected. Patients will be subsequently randomly assigned to undergo biopsy using either CBCT or MDCT guidance. This study will analyze the pneumothorax incidence between groups, and assess for associations between lesion size/location, pertinent imaging findings, and clinical risk factors.
This research study to determine the effectiveness of the AveCure Flexible Microwave Ablation Probe to destroy cancerous lung nodules up to 3 c m in size. This research study involves microwave ablation (MWA)
Robotic-assisted bronchoscopy (RaB) has afforded proceduralists the ability to accurately reach the periphery of the lung for biopsy of pulmonary nodules1. This has paved the way for patients to undergo both biopsy of a peripheral nodule and a staging linear endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) in the same anesthesia event, promoting quicker throughput from discovery of a lesion to guideline-adherent treatment2. Further, introduction and mainstream utilization of cone-beam CT (CBCT) has provided the bronchoscopist the ability to refine needle position with tool-in-lesion confirmation3. While there are no randomized clinical trials promoting efficacy of RaB and CBCT in comparison with other bronchoscopic methods, in single center retrospective studies, diagnostic yield has consistently proven to be in the 70-85% range, superior to prior technologies4-6. One of the limitations of utilization of RaB and CBCT is the detrimental effect that atelectasis plays in the bronchoscopy procedure. This can lead to false positive radial EBUS (rEBUS) signals and non-diagnostic procedures7. This incidence of atelectasis has been evaluated prospectively, using a protocol featuring 8-10 cmH2O of PEEP and limiting hyperoxia8, and results suggest this ventilator strategy does an adequate job preventing intraprocedural lung collapse. However, this study only evaluated incidence of atelectasis and did not elaborate on its impact on diagnostic yield. Further unknown is the optimal sequence of performance of RaB and a staging linear EBUS in patients with a radiographically normal mediastinum. Starting with either the RaB or Linear EBUS both have their pros and cons. The benefit to performance of a linear EBUS first is the potential to obviate the need for peripheral nodule biopsy by obtaining rapid, on-site pathologic feedback of occult nodal disease, reducing some of the risk of the procedure (i.e. bleeding and pneumothorax).6 Conversely, the pitfalls to performing linear EBUS first is the possible contribution of atelectasis resultant of the increased time from intubation to peripheral nodule biopsy, blood in the airway causing bronchospasm, and resorption atelectasis from hyperoxia9. There are no prospective data evaluating this in a randomized fashion, but one Monte Carlo simulation (with assumption of diagnostic yield from navigational bronchoscopy of 70% when performed first and 60% when performed second) suggested a higher diagnostic yield and less need for repeat procedure in the navigation first group, despite a 10% assumption of occult nodal disease10. As outlined in the specific aims above, the overarching goals of this study are to assess in a multicenter, randomized clinical trial performed by members of the Interventional Pulmonary Outcomes Group (IPOG), whether sequence of staging EBUS plays a role in diagnostic yield, incidence of atelectasis, and safety outcomes in patients undergoing RaB.