Search clinical trials by condition, location and status
Gene therapy is a new possible treatment for the anemia of DBAS. Gene therapy will soon be available for patients with RPS19-mutated DBAS. This involves inserting the corrected RPS19 gene into the cells, leading to correction of the anemia. The application of gene therapy requires sufficient numbers of stem cells on which the correction can be performed. Stem cells must be mobilized (stimulated to move) from the bone marrow to the peripheral blood and then collected (also called 'harvested'). It is not known if patients with DBAS can mobilize enough stem cells into the peripheral blood to allow for the harvesting of sufficient numbers to permit genetic manipulation. It is important to demonstrate the ability to harvest an adequate number of stem cells before gene therapy can be tried in patients with DBAS. The purpose of this study is to determine if mobilization of stem cells from the bone marrow in patients with DBAS is enough to obtain the numbers of peripheral blood stem cells necessary for effective gene therapy. An actual harvest will not be done.
The goal for this clinical trial is to compare rapid effects of four products on stem cells, immune activation, and mitochondrial function. A double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study design will be used.
Adherence to the medical regimen after stem cell transplant is challenging for both patients and their family caregivers. The investigators propose a randomized clinical trial testing two brief psychosocial interventions to determine if either improves patient and family caregiver psychosocial and health-related outcomes.
This is a Phase I study of ex vivo expanded CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells (exHSCs) plus nivolumab in pediatric patients with histologically confirmed diagnosis of a non-brainstem high-grade glioma (NB-HGG, WHO Grade III or IV astrocytoma, oligodendrogliomas, oligoastrocytomas, ependymomas) that is recurrent, progressive or refractory following radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy. Patients must be candidates for standard of care surgical resection or biopsy.
The purpose of this study is to find the smallest amount of the 131 I-apamistamab needed for preparing patients with severe sickle cell disease (SCD) for a bone marrow transplant. This is the first time 131 I-apamistamab is being used for advanced Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) in the setting of allogeneic stem cell transplant. 131 I-apamistamab is an investigational product. This means that 131 I-apamistamab has not been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for medical use in patients. The study treatment that is given before the transplant is called the conditioning regimen. In this study, the investigators are adding a drug called 131 I-apamistamab instead of the conditioning regimen typically given before a stem cell transplant.
The purpose of this study is to find out whether adding belumosudil to a usual approach for reducing the risk of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) may be an effective GVHD prevention approach for people with blood cancer who have a stem cell transplant. The investigators will also look at the safety of the study approach.
This is an open-label, multi-site, Phase II randomized trial with response-adaptive design for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) participants who have had prior induction therapy. The primary objective of this study is to compare the rates of achieving undetectable measurable residual disease (MRD) in the bone marrow with elranatamab and daratumumab employed as post-induction consolidation and maintenance treatment (Arm A) versus autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) followed by lenalidomide and daratumumab treatment (Arm B).
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if using an intervention website (Mosaic) improves selected patient-reported outcomes in adult blood cancer patients undergoing allogeneic or autologous stem cell transplant, compared to using an educational website (control group). Patients will be recruited prior to their scheduled transplant, then randomized to use one of these two study websites throughout the study. They will complete five assessments during the study: one before transplant (baseline) and four after transplant (2, 4, 6, and 8 month follow-ups). The main questions this trial aims to answer are: 1. Compared to patients using the control group website, do patients using the intervention website report greater improvements in general psychological distress, cancer treatment-related distress, physical symptoms, and health-related quality of life? 2. Are these benefits at least partially explained by improvements in perceived preparedness, self-efficacy, and approach coping and/or reductions in avoidant coping and perceived stress? 3. Do some patients benefit more from using the intervention website than others? Specifically, we will examine whether patients' primary language (English/Spanish) and their initial psychological distress are related to the benefit they get from using the intervention website. We will also explore effects of sex, race, ethnicity, and transplant type.
Background: X-linked hyper-IgM (HIGM) syndrome is caused by a mutation in the CD40 ligand (CD40L) gene. People with this disease have white blood cells that do not work properly. These people are at risk of severe infections and autoimmune diseases. Researchers want to know if these base-edited stem cells and T cells can help people with CD40L-HIGM syndrome. Objective: To test base-edited stem cells and base-edited T cells in 1 person with CD40L-HIGM syndrome. Eligibility: A single male with CD40L-HIGM syndrome. Design: A single participant is planned to receive a single dose of edited stem cells and supportive treatment with edited T cells. Participant stem and T cells will undergo base editing to repair the mutation. In preparation for the gene therapy, the participant will receive busulfan chemotherapy and alemtuzumab. After treatment, the participant will have follow-up visits every few months in the first 2 years after treatment. Long-term visits will continue annually for 15 years.
The WeDecide study is a large observational study comparing the long-term effects of matched related donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (MRD HCT) and non-transplant disease-modifying therapies (NT-DMT) for pediatric patients with sickle cell disease (SCD). The study aims to assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL), cognitive function, risks, and benefits of both treatments, including survival rates, chronic complications, and organ damage prevention. With 160 children in the MRD HCT group and 320 in the NT-DMT group, aged 3-20.9 years, the study will follow participants for three years, examining factors like disease severity, treatment history, and social determinants of health. By providing a comprehensive comparison, the study seeks to inform clinical decisions and improve understanding of SCD treatment outcomes, ultimately supporting families and healthcare providers in choosing the best treatment options.