Search clinical trials by condition, location and status
This phase III trial compares the effect of using lanreotide before surgery to surgery alone in preventing pancreatic fistulas in patients with pancreatic cancer or a pancreatic lesion that could become cancerous. Lanreotide, a type of somatostatin analog similar to somatostatin (a hormone made by the body), and is used to treat certain types of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, and carcinoid syndrome. It may help stop the body from making extra amounts of certain hormones, including growth hormone, insulin, glucagon, and hormones that affect digestion. It may also help keep certain types of tumor cells from growing. Patients with pancreatic cancer or pancreatic lesions may undergo surgery to remove parts of the pancreas, also called a distal pancreatectomy. Patients may experience complications after surgery, including pancreatic fistulas. A pancreatic fistula occurs when there is a small leak from the pancreas, causing fluids to collect. This can often lead to infection and other problems. Giving lanreotide before undergoing distal pancreatectomy may be more effective than surgery alone in preventing the development of a pancreatic fistula in patients with pancreatic cancer or a pancreatic lesion that could become cancerous.
This will be a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, pilot trial with two parallel groups (1:1 ratio) receiving either dexmedetomidine (initial bolus of 1 mcg/kg over 30 min after induction, followed by an infusion rate of 0.3 mcg/kg/hr that will be stopped 30-45 minutes before the end of the surgery or upon reaching maximum dose of 2mcg/kg, whichever comes first) or placebo (normal saline as a bolus followed by maintenance infusion at the same rate of the intervention group). Dexmedetomidine is frequently administered in thoracic surgery. Using local data from the Brigham and Women's Hospital, dexmedetomidine was used in a third of the thoracic procedures performed over the past three years. However, there is no consensus as to the optimal protocol of administration, therefore clinical practice is highly heterogeneous (bolus versus continuous infusion) and mostly depends on the preferences of anesthesia providers. In our institution, the dose of dexmedetomidine is typically 0.5 mcg/kg but varies based on attending preferences and experience. Given the heterogenous practices in dexmedetomidine administration, one of the objectives is to assess the feasibility of adhering to a dexmedetomidine protocol using an initial loading dose of 1 mcg/kg over 30 minutes after induction followed by a continuous infusion of 0.3 mcg/kg/hr. The infusion will stop 30-45 minutes prior to the end of surgery or once a maximum dose of 2mcg/kg has been achieved, whichever comes first. The control group will receive normal saline (similar bolus followed by maintenance infusion at the same rate of the intervention group).
The investigators will conduct a 13,000-patient randomized multi-center trial to determine (i) which general anesthesia technique yields superior patient recovery experiences in any of three surgical categories ((a) major inpatient surgery, (b) minor inpatient surgery, (c) outpatient surgery) and (ii) whether TIVA confers no more than a small (0.2 %) increased risk of intraoperative awareness than INVA in patients undergoing both outpatient and inpatient surgeries
The overarching goal of this research is to use machine learning analysis of high-resolution data-collected by wearable technology-of cardiothoracic surgical patients to assess recovery and detect complications at their earliest stage
Goal of the Clinical Trial: The purpose of this clinical trial is to learn whether Xperience™ surgical irrigation solution is more effective than a standard dilute povidone-iodine solution in reducing surgical site infections (SSIs) following implant-based breast reconstruction in female patients, aged 18 and older. It will also assess the safety and overall surgical outcomes when using Xperience™ compared to povidone-iodine. Main Questions the Study Aims to Answer: * Does the use of Xperience™ decrease the incidence of surgical site infections compared to povidone-iodine? * What are the differences in the rates of premature implant removal due to infection between patients treated with Xperience™ and those treated with povidone-iodine? * Are there fewer post-surgical complications with Xperience™ compared to povidone-iodine? Study Design: Participants in this study will be randomly assigned to receive either Xperience™ or a dilute povidone-iodine solution during their bilateral implant-based breast reconstruction. Only the research team will know which irrgiation is given- the participant will not know. Participant Will: * Undergo the surgical procedure using one of the two irrigation solutions. * Receive regular post-operative check-ups to monitor for signs of infection and other complications. * Have data collected on any post-surgical complications, the necessity for early implant removal, and overall surgical outcomes.
Prevent CSA-AKI (Cardiac Surgery Associated Acute Kidney Injury) trial is a double blinded randomized controlled trial, 242 patients undergoing elective cardiopulmonary bypass surgery (CPB)will either receive a placebo or daily 1200 mg of Co enzyme Q10 (CoQ10) and 1000 mg of Glutathione (GSH), the first dose will be given the day before surgery and continues while admitted up to 1 week. Blood and urine samples will be collected. Adverse events related to the study drugs will be collected.
The objective of this study is to determine if the use of scissors without electrosurgery is superior to bipolar electrosurgery for resection of uterine septum. The investigators will be comparing procedure-level variables such as operative time, complications, and need for additional procedures.
The proportion of noncardiac surgeries performed as same-day surgery is increasing worldwide, with more complex surgeries being performed on higher risk patients in the outpatient setting. Little is known on the risk factors, incidence and prognosis of patients undergoing same-day noncardiac surgery. The main objective of this study is to inform on the incidence and risk factors of cardiovascular and other adverse events after same-day surgery and to develop risk prediction tools to better inform on the risk and selection of patients undergoing same-day surgery.
Our primary objective is to determine if the use of tumescence has a meaningful effect on STSG uptake at the recipient site. This is an important outcome because poor graft uptake results in the need for prolonged local wound care, additional clinic visits for patients and increased risk of infection. A prospective, randomized comparison of the tumescence to our current standard of care will allow us to definitively evaluate any benefits to this technique. Tumescence is commonly used in the treatment of burn patients to minimize blood loss during both tangential excision of eschar and during harvest of split-thickness grafts for reconstruction. This is considered the standard of care in burn surgery as using tumescence has been clearly demonstrated to reduce intraoperative blood loss during harvest of large skin grafts and excision of large burns when compared with the application of topical epinephrine as was the historic standard practice.4-6 Tumescence also creates a firm and uniform surface from which to harvest the skin graft, which the investigators believe may improve the quality of harvest and rate of skin graft take.
Researchers are trying to identify predictors for gastroesophageal reflux disease after sleeve gastrectomy.