Search clinical trials by condition, location and status
The purpose of this study is to compare the outcomes of using Bioelectric wound dressing on the pre-operative wound site and post operatively and compared it outcomes to the standard of care chlorhexidine skin preparation.
This non-interventional, single-blinded, prospective, observational study assesses the planar distribution of leukocyte esterase in wounds by placing wound exudates soaked wound dressings in the DETEC® Esterase device during routine wound care. The output of the device is correlated with clinical determination of infection to assess the device efficacy in identifying presumptive infections.
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if reducing bacterial load on the skin and nostrils with topical antibacterial soap and ointment, respectively, reduces rate of infection in surgical sites on lower leg wounds left open to heal in adults undergoing skin cancer surgery. The main question it aims to answer is: Does Hibiclens antibacterial skin cleanser and mupirocin antibacterial ointment applied to nostrils prior to surgery lower the number of times participants develop an infection in their open wound on the lower leg? Researchers will compare the treatment group to the standard of care, which involves no treatment prior to surgery, to see if topical antibiotics applied prior to surgery affect infection rates between the two groups. Participants randomized to the treatment group will: Shower with Hibiclens once daily for 5 days prior to the day of surgery and apply mupirocin to the nostrils twice daily for 5 days prior to the day of surgery. They will then send pictures of their surgical site to monitor for signs of infection at 2-week and 4-week post-operation. Participants randomized to the control group (standard of care) will: NOT apply the topical antibacterials prior to the day of surgery. They will then send pictures of their surgical site to monitor for signs of infection at 2-week intervals for 1 month after surgery.
The investigators hypothesize that the use of a personal hand hygiene system (SafeHavenTM) by anesthesia providers in the adult operating room, combined with a novel infectious pathogen tracking system (OR PathTrac) will decrease participant exposure to pathologic bacteria in the adult operating room.
This is a prospective randomized, controlled, unblinded, interventional feasibility study to evaluate if showering with post operative drains in place leads to an increase in complications. The patients included in the study will be those undergoing breast reductions and panniculectomies at Geisinger Medical Center. The patients will be randomized post operatively into one of two groups: 1) patients instructed to shower with drains in place, and 2) patients instructed not to shower while they have drains in place.
This is a Phase 3 multi-center, group-randomized, crossover trial to compare nasal antimicrobial photodisinfection therapy (aPDT) with standard of care for prevention of surgical site infections in patients undergoing major elective, urgent, or emergent surgeries in a hospital setting. The main outcomes are to: 1. compare the efficacy, and 2. estimate the safety of applying nasal (aPDT) before surgery in reducing the incidence of SSIs within the initial 30 days after surgery compared to standard of care (SOC). Participants in the intervention group will receive aPDT prior to surgery on the day of surgery. Participants in the control group will receive standard of care surgical site prevention measures prior to surgery.
This is a single center randomized control trial assessing the effect of early versus delayed bathing on orthopaedic surgical wounds in patients undergoing surgical treatment of fractures. Patients will be recruited by screening all patients undergoing surgical treatment for fractures at our institution. Patients who provide written consent will be randomized to one of two treatment arms after confirming eligibility criteria. Group A will be advised to begin early normal bathing (non-submerged showering) with uncovered surgical wounds. Group B will be advised to follow traditional delayed bathing with covered wounds. Those who do not wish to participate in the randomized trial will be invited to participate observationally (no randomization) and have the same prospective follow-up.
Currently there is no study investigating best skin cleaning patterns prior to cesarean deliveries. As a result, doctors perform skin preparation using random unstudied techniques. Techniques vary from Hospital to Hospital and even within the same institution. The most widely used topical skin preparation is ChloraPrep and the manufacturer has not recommended a specific pattern to be used in order to abdominally prep prior to C-sections. In addition most studies do not examine the effectiveness in the obese population. The manufacture has established a recommended dosage area of 13in x13in per ChloraPrep stick as well as timing from initial preparation until the practice reached its maximum antiseptic benefit. Our current cesarean infection rate is very low, at just 1.6% over the last 12 months (September 2107-2018). This is significantly lower than the average cesarean section infection rate in the United States which is around 7.4% using iodine based preparations. Cesarean deliveries are one of the most common major surgeries performed in the United States, 31.9% of all births are by cesarean section. The risk of infection following a cesarean delivery is nearly 5 times that of a vaginal delivery. However, there is still no study that examines the pattern which ChloraPrep is applied to the abdomen prior to a cesarean delivery in patients with a BMI greater than 30. The pattern of skin preparation appears to be heavily related to physician training and personal bias.
This study is a prospective, multi-center, two-arm, unblinded, and randomized controlled trial with a goal of evaluating the impact of a closed incision negative pressure dressing (PREVENA) on incidence of post-operative wound complications and medical costs in patients undergoing lower extremity amputation.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the role of rapid diagnosis of pathogens in treatment of infection and wound healing in diabetic foot ulcers. This research is studying the use of a new device of people to learn if metagenomic next generation sequencing (mNGS) techniques technology is a feasible tool that can be used to direct targeted antibiotic therapy in infected diabetic foot ulcers. Participant's tissue will be randomized to usual care tissue collection and cultures (standard of care) or usual care tissue collection and cultures (standard of care) plus metagenomics next generation sequencing (mNGS). The participant's will not be randomized to any treatment (i.e. antibiotic therapy).