265 Clinical Trials for Various Conditions
This study explores how help-seeking behaviors for both emotional well-being and allergies impact the management of allergic rhinitis, asthma, and mental health symptoms, including anxiety and depression. The research involves a retrospective and longitudinal analysis of patients who sought treatment for allergic rhinitis and mental health concerns. The goal is to highlight the importance of integrating mental health care into allergy treatment plans to improve overall patient outcomes.
This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of digital tools in managing allergic rhinitis (AR) in primary care settings. AR is a common condition that affects many people's quality of life. The study will test whether digital tools, such as the QHSLab platform, can help patients better control their symptoms, improve adherence to treatment, and enhance overall well-being. The trial will compare two groups: one using standard care and the other using both standard care and digital tools. Participants will be monitored over 12 months, and the study will measure changes in symptom severity, treatment adherence, quality of life, and healthcare usage. The study will also gather feedback from patients and healthcare providers about their experience with the digital tools. The digital tools used in this study are designed to help patients manage their AR more effectively by providing regular symptom assessments, medication reminders, and personalized feedback based on their health data. This summary ensures the information is clear and straightforward for patients, families, and healthcare providers while maintaining compliance with IRB guidelines.
The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lebrikizumab in adult participants with perennial allergic rhinitis. The study will last about 18 months
The PQGrass306 (G306) clinical trial is the pivotal Phase III efficacy clinical trial of PQ Grass. The aim of the G306 pivotal clinical trial is to confirm the efficacy and safety of the optimal effective dose of PQ Grass 27600 SU. This will be determined through the measurements of the effect of PQ Grass on the symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR)/rhinoconjunctivitis and the use of relief medications to control these symptoms during the peak grass pollen season (GPS).
The purpose of this study to determine the therapeutic response of non-allergic rhinitis patients that have been subtyped as non-allergic rhinitis with local IgE elevation or non-allergic rhinopathy to intranasal capsaicin based on visual analog scale and optical rhinometry, to determine the prevalence of non-allergic rhinitis with local IgE elevation in this study's cohort of patients with non-allergic rhinitis identified by rhinitis history and negative skin testing for allergic rhinitis, and to determine the change, if any, in intranasal IgE levels after capsaicin treatment.
The primary objective of the study is to determine the efficacy of REGN1908-1909, as compared to placebo, to reduce allergic rhinitis/conjunctivitis symptoms and allergy rescue medication use during natural cat exposure. The Secondary Objectives are: * To assess the reduction of allergic symptoms and use of allergy rescue medications after treatment with REGN1908-1909 versus placebo, as measured by the individual components of the CSMS * To assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL) as measured by the Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ\[S\]) * To determine the efficacy of REGN1908-1909, as compared to placebo, to inhibit a wheal-and-flare response to a skin prick test with cat allergen * To assess the durability of effect in allergic rhinitis and conjunctivitis symptom and medication scores after multiple doses of REGN1908-1909 compared to placebo given every 12 weeks (Q12W) * To determine the efficacy following multiple doses of REGN1908-1909 compared to placebo at inhibiting a wheal-and-flare response to a skin prick test with cat allergen * To estimate the effect of REGN1908-1909 on lung function, as compared to placebo, in patients with asthma * To determine the efficacy of REGN1908-1909 as compared to placebo to reduce asthma symptoms in patients with asthma * To assess whether there is a difference in asthma rescue medication use in patients with asthma who are treated with REGN1908-1909 compared to placebo * To assess whether there is a difference in nighttime awakenings in patients with asthma treated with REGN1908-1909 compared to placebo * To evaluate the short-term and long-term safety and tolerability of REGN1908-1909, including the incidence of hypersensitivity reactions, local injection site reactions, and asthma exacerbations * To determine systemic exposure of total (free and antigen-bound) antibodies as measured by concentration of REGN1908 and REGN1909 * To assess the immunogenicity of REGN1908 and REGN1909
The purpose of this study is to evaluate a previously FDA-approved medication that is known to help with allergy symptoms to see if it can decrease symptoms in patients with Meniere's Disease.
The primary objective is to assess the reduction of allergic symptoms as measured by combined symptom and medication score (CSMS) during birch pollen season after a single dose of REGN5713-5714-5715 versus placebo.
This is a Phase 2a study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Norketotifen (NKT) in subjects with allergic rhinitis.
Exposure to airborne allergens and pollutants is linked to symptom severity of allergies, asthma and other respiratory problems. In this study an air purifier using photo-electrochemical oxidation technology (PECO) will be used in the home environment of study participants. The investigator will assess the reduction of symptoms from allergic rhinitis/conjunctivitis and asthma.
Study to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of GSP 301 nasal spray (NS) compared with placebo NS in pediatric subjects (aged 6 to under 12 years) with Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis (SAR).
This is a randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, phase 2, single center, proof-of-concept study which will evaluate the effect of a preparation of FDA approved allergens (PMA) used as a sub-cutaneously administered immunotherapy for the management of allergic rhinitis (perennial and seasonal).
This is a Prospective, Controlled, Double Blinded, Single Center, Randomized, 3 Arm, Parallel Assignment, Phase 1b/2a Study to assess the safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of B244 delivered as an intranasal spray in healthy volunteers and subjects with seasonal allergic rhinitis.
Study to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of GSP 301 NS compared with placebo NS and individual monotherapy formulations for the treatment of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis (subjects 12 years of age and older)
To evaluate the long term safety and efficacy of GSP 301 NS compared to 2 placebo NS formulations for the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis (subjects 12 years of age and older)
Study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of GSP 301 NS compared to placebo NS and to individual monotherapies (comparators) as well as the efficacy of these monotherapies (comparators) versus placebo NS over 14 days of study treatment
Dymista, a combined product containing the antihistamine azelastine and the intranasal steroid fluticasone, provides superior clinical efficacy to both fluticasone propionate and azelastine hydrochloride in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis. The superiority of efficacy not only occurs at the initiation of treatment, but persists for its duration. The mechanism underlying the superior efficacy of Dymista is not known. This trial focuses on examining the effects of Dymista on the dynamics of the allergic response in man using nasal provocation with antigen. The investigators will study the relationship between symptoms, physiology, cells and mediators.
Study to evaluate the two different strengths and dose regimen of GSP 301 to be effective in treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.
This double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel group, multi-site study has been designed to compare the safety and efficacy of a generic Fluticasone propionate Nasal Spray, 50 mcg (Teva Pharmaceuticals USA) to the FDA Reference Listed Drug, Flonase® (fluticasone propionate) 50 mcg nasal spray (GlaxoSmithKline), in the relief of the signs and symptoms of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis. Additionally, both the test and reference formulations will be tested for superiority against a placebo nasal spray.
To compare safety and efficacy of Perrigo's steroid drug product compared with an FDA approved steroid drug product in the treatment of subjects with seasonal allergic rhinitis.
This first-in-human (FIH) study is a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, ascending dose study to investigate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of XmAb7195 in adult healthy volunteers and in adult subjects with elevated IgE levels.
To evaluate the therapeutic equivalence of the lest formulation of Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray, 50 mcg to the marketed formulation NASONEX® (mometasone furoate monohydrate) Nasal Spray, 50 mcg/actuation in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis
We hypothesize that ear acupressure will be effective in treating seasonal allergic rhinitis by changing the immune parameters and the psychological impact factors are associated with ear acupressure treatment outcome.
This phase IV investigational trial is being conducted to evaluate the efficacy of a 2-week treatment of fluticasone propionate nasal spray (FPNS) vs. cetirizine on allergic nasal and ocular symptoms and quality of life in adult subjects with SAR. It is hypothesized that FPNS provides greater nasal symptom relief than cetirizine. The primary measure used to test this hypothesis is the change from baseline over two weeks in reflective total nasal symptom score (rTNSS) compared between FPNS and cetirizine. Approximately 648 subjects will be randomized into a 1:1:1:1 ratio of treatment allocation across approximately twenty-five to thirty-five sites in the US during the 2013 fall allergy season. All subjects will be outpatients. The total duration of study will be approximately 21 days including 7 days of screening period, and 14 days of treatment period.
The purpose of this study is to determine if Dymista nasal spray is better and safer than placebo in treating children ages 4 to \<12 years old who have seasonal allergic rhinitis.
The investigators hypothesize that treatment with QNASL will reduce nasal mucosal inflammation induced by the allergy season and prevent the changes in the microbiome caused by the allergy season.
This is a 3 month safety study of Dymista Nasal spray in children aged 4 to 11 years with allergic rhinitis
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) nasal aerosol in subjects with Perennial Allergic Rhinitis (PAR).
This study will examine dose ranging characteristics of bepotastine besilate nasal spray compared to placebo nasal spray in 600 male or female subjects 12 years of age and older with active seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) and a demonstrated history of allergic sensitivity to Mountain Cedar pollen for at least 2 years prior to the study.
The purpose of this study is to compare the effect of 6 weeks of treatment with beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) nasal aerosol versus placebo on HPA-axis function, as assessed by 24-hour serum cortisol weighted mean, and to evaluate the safety and tolerability of BDP nasal aerosol, in subjects 6 to 11 years of age with perennial allergic rhinitis.