6 Clinical Trials for Various Conditions
This study aims to compare the clinical impact of Constrained Condylar versus Posterior Stabilized Knee (PS) bearings on patient satisfaction and surgical outcomes including mid-term survivorship among patients undergoing revision total knee arthroplasty.
The objectives of this clinical investigation are to evaluate the safety and performance of the Freedom Total Knee® PCK System.
The purpose of this study is to examine the short term efficacy of the MRH system as well as determine if operating room time is decreased using this simple, two-tray system.
Mg OSTEOCRETE is a bone substitute used to fill a defect in bone caused by excision of a tumor, orthopaedic hardware that has become loosened, or a trauma-related condition. The aim of this study is to determine the amount of time it takes for bone to heal after treatment with Mg OSTEOCRETE, and to better understand the efficacy of this treatment through clinical and patient-reported outcomes.
The purpose of this study is to compare rates of varus collapse, aseptic loosening, and implant failure in female obese patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and will review the degree of influence of stemmed tibial components versus non-stemmed tibial components on varus collapse and aseptic loosening, a consequence of implant micromotion.
This study will attempt to draw relationships between the soft-tissue related complications contributing to early TKA revision and the loading and positional patterns from intraoperative tibial trial sensors. The data from the sensors may enable the surgeon to address such soft-tissue abnormalities that may otherwise be unknown during traditional total knee revision procedures. The utilization of sensors should in theory, help diagnose the potential causes attributing to soft-tissue imbalance and may lead to a decreased need for an all component revision. Furthermore, the economic implications from converting a total revision to a partial revision could have a profound effect to the patient and healthcare provider such as decreased rehabilitation regimes and opportunity for cost savings. Eligible revision patients who agree to participate will be followed for a period of 12 months following the revision procedure. Patient reported outcomes measures (PROM) such as the 2011 Knee Society Score (KSS) and the Veterans Rand 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12) will be collected at baseline (pre-operatively) and at 6 weeks, 6 months and 12 months post-procedure. All outcomes will be scored to observe changes from baseline at 12-months. Cost-analyses of sensor-assisted revision TKA will be performed to include OR costs, facility and physician fees, as well as payments to post-acute collaborators such as SNFs, rehab hospitals, PT and home care providers. A quantitative analysis of commercial payer claims / usage data (e.g., CMS Medpar data) will be used to examine costs associated with traditional revision TKA procedures.