106 Clinical Trials for Various Conditions
This project utilizes a novel cardiac pacing approach hypothesized to initiate beneficial cardiac conditioning and remodeling over a period of time.
This study is designed to determine if a simplified technique for cardiac device reprogramming using pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) data in the acute setting holds promise to improve subjective assessments of patient quality of life (QOL), objective measurements of functional capacity, and specific systolic and diastolic echocardiographic indices.
This is a prospective, multi-center non-randomized clinical study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the QuickFlex Micro Model 1258T left ventricular lead in a heart failure patient population. The study will be conducted at a maximum of 20 investigational centers located in the United States and a total of 68 patients will be enrolled.
The objective of the ProMRI Study (Phase B) is to demonstrate the clinical safety of the ProMRI Pacemaker System when used under specific MRI conditions without scan exclusion zone.
The purpose of the Optimize RV Follow-Up study is to determine the long-term effect of selective site pacing. Selective site pacing refers to which area of the right ventricle the lead is placed. The goal of selective site pacing is to improve how the heart contracts when paced.
The purpose of the Optimize RV study is to determine the long-term effect of selective site pacing. Selective site pacing refers to which area of the right ventricle the lead is placed. The goal of select site pacing is to improve how the heart contracts when paced in the ventricle. By pacing in select sites, it is possible to better copy the natural pattern of contraction of the heart.
Temporary transcutaneous cardiac pacing is a life-saving procedure in patients with unstable bradycardia. The American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines for the management of unstable bradycardia recommend initiating transcutaneous pacing in patients unresponsive to atropine while addressing the primary cause of the bradycardia. The two most commonly described pacer pad application sites are the anterior-posterior (A-P) position (positive pad placed under the left scapula and negative pad placed on the left anterior lower chest wall) and the anterior-lateral (A-L) position (positive pad placed on the right anterior chest wall and negative pad placed on the left lower axilla). Major resuscitation organization (AHA, European, Australian) guidelines and text books of emergency medicine recommendations for pacer pad placement do not address the issue of which set of positions are preferred. There are no published human studies addressing ideal pacer pad placement. This study's objective is to assess if there is a significant difference in the pacing threshold (mA) between these two pacer pad positions. The study hypothesis is that the anterior-posterior position will require a lower current and cause less involuntary muscle contraction. The investigators plan to enroll volunteer human subjects undergoing elective cardioversion in the electrophysiology laboratory for atrial fibrillation/flutter. After successful cardioversion to a sinus rhythm, each subject will be transcutaneously paced to mechanical capture in both pacer pad positions. Optimal placement will be determined by the pad position with the lowest current required for capture. The conclusions of this study will provide evidence for the optimal choice regarding pacer pad placement, which can be used in future resuscitation guidelines.
This prospective, multicenter, post-market clinical study was designed to evaluate the outcomes of lead extraction of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIED) using Cook catheter and lead extraction devices for any indication it is used in the commercial setting within the United States and Europe. The purpose of this clinical study is to collect data on the performance of the Cook lead extraction devices for the purpose of supporting publications and presentations
The purpose of this clinical study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Attain Stability Quadripolar MRI SureScan Left Ventricular (LV) lead (Model 4798).
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Medtronic Attain Performa Quadripolar Leads (Model 4298, 4398, and 4598) during and post the implant procedure. This study will also assess the interactions of the Attain Performa leads with the entire Medtronic CRT-D system.
The purpose of this post-approval study is to evaluate the acute and chronic performance of a Quadripolar CRT-D device system in a patient population indicated for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).
The purpose of this multicenter post-approval study is to evaluate the acute and chronic performance of the QuickFlex® μ 1258T left ventricular (LV) lead.
This study is designed to show that a new lead, which paces the left bottom chamber (left ventricle) of the heart, is safe and effective. Using a lead on the left side of the heart has been shown to potentially improve heart failure symptoms. The shape and size of this new lead may make it a good choice for patients or physicians.
The purpose of this study is to determine the optimal images of the heart structures which are used to guide AF ablation or BiVenticle and coronary vessels.
Heart failure is a progressive disease that decreases the pumping action of the heart. This may cause a backup of fluid in the heart and may result in heart beat changes. When there are changes in the heart beat sometimes an implantable heart device is used to control the rate and rhythm of the heart beat. In certain heart failure cases, when the two lower chambers of the heart no longer beat in a coordinated manner, cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) may be prescribed. CRT is similar to a pacemaker. It is placed (implanted) under the skin of the upper chest. CRT is delivered as tiny electrical pulses to the right and left ventricles through three or four leads (soft insulated wires) that are inserted through the veins to the heart. People who have a dangerously fast heart beat, or whose heart is at risk of stopping beating, may be in need of an electronic device called an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). An ICD is implanted surgically just under the skin in the upper chest area and it sends a strong electrical impulse, or shock, to the heart to return it to a normal rhythm. If the heart is beating too slowly or at an abnormal rhythm, an ICD can also pace the heart to return the heart to its normal rhythm. The InSync ICD device can change the timing of when the left and right ventricles of the heart are paced to beat. The purpose of this study is to monitor the long-term performance of the InSync ICD Model 7272 and the InSync Marquis 7277 systems for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).
Heart failure is a progressive disease that decreases the pumping action of the heart. This may cause a backup of fluid in the heart and may result in heart beat changes. When there are changes in the heart beat sometimes an implantable heart device is used to control the rate and rhythm of the heart beat. In certain heart failure cases, when the two lower chambers of the heart no longer beat in a coordinated manner, cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) may be prescribed. CRT is similar to a pacemaker. It is placed (implanted) under the skin of the upper chest. CRT is delivered as tiny electrical pulses to the right and left ventricles through three or four leads (soft insulated wires) that are inserted through the veins to the heart. The purpose of this study is to monitor the long-term performance of the InSync Model 8040 (InSync) and InSync III Model 8042 (InSync III) systems for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).
Heart failure is a progressive disease that decreases the pumping action of the heart. This may cause a backup of fluid in the heart and may result in heart beat changes. When there are changes in the heart beat sometimes an implantable heart device is used to control the rate and rhythm of the heart beat. In certain heart failure cases, when the two lower chambers of the heart no longer beat in a coordinated manner, cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) may be prescribed. CRT is similar to a pacemaker. It is placed (implanted) under the skin of the upper chest. CRT is delivered as tiny electrical pulses to the right and left ventricles through three or four leads (flexible insulated wires) that are inserted through the veins to the heart. The purpose of this study is to evaluate a new lead for delivering energy to the left ventricle (bottom left chamber of the heart).
The main purpose of the Product Performance Report (formerly referred to as System Longevity Study) is to evaluate long-term performance of Medtronic market-released cardiac rhythm products by analyzing product survival probabilities.
The SITELINE 2 Polyurethane Clinical Investigation analyzed the safety and electrical performance of the SITELINE 2 Polyurethane pacing lead.
The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and effectiveness of the EASYTRAK EPI lead.
The purpose of this study is to use real-world evidence to validate that conduction system pacing (CSP), delivered via a Medtronic 3830 catheter-delivered lead and a Medtronic dual-chamber transvenous pacemaker, is a safe and effective alternative to biventricular pacing (BVP) in patients indicated for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) to deliver cardiac physiologic pacing (CPP), as documented in the clinical literature.
The goal of this study is to compare the effectiveness of pacing from a physiologic His bundle (HB) lead position versus with the standard coronary sinus (CS) lead position in subjects with heart failure undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). While placement of left ventricular leads via the coronary sinus has anatomic limitations, we hypothesis that the achievement of QRS narrowing with His bundle capture will be superior for improving systolic function by echocardiographic indices (ejection fraction and strain) and quality of life and decreased rehospitalization and mortality.
The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of biventricular pacing over conventional right ventricular pacing in patients with persistent or permanent, symptomatic atrial fibrillation undergoing atrioventricular (AV) node ablation and permanent pacing therapy.
The study is intended to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Boston Scientific INGEVITY+ cardiac pacing lead when implanted in the left bundle branch area (LBBA).
This a single-center, retrospective, observational study of patients that undergo coronary sinus(CS) lead revision, comparing epicardial lead placement to coronary sinus pacing(CSP) in those that had lead failure.
The investigators aim to prospectively evaluate the efficacy and mechanism of benefit of His-bundle pacing enhanced cardiac resynchronization therapy (His-CRT) vs. cardiac resynchronization therapy (BIV-CRT) in patients with heart failure and right bundle branch block (RBBB).
Heart failure is a progressive disease that decreases the pumping action of the heart. This may cause a backup of fluid in the heart and may result in heart beat changes. When there are changes in the heartbeat, sometimes a pacemaker is used to control the rate and rhythm of the heartbeat. In this trial, the researchers will test if pacing both the left and right lower half of the heart (ventricles) will: * decrease the number of hospital and clinic visits due to heart failure symptoms * extend life * delay heart failure symptoms as compared to those who are paced in only one ventricle (the right ventricle)
Heart Failure (HF) is a disease of epidemic proportion in the U.S. affecting over 5 million individuals. It is estimated that in the next year nearly 400,000 new cases will be diagnosed, 1 million individuals will be hospitalized and 300,000 deaths will occur because of HF. Approximately half of the deaths will be attributed to worsening pump function while the remainder will be attributable to sudden cardiac death. Biventricular (BIV) pacing has recently emerged as an exciting new treatment of advanced HF with dramatic benefits to some patients. Current candidates include those with ventricular conduction abnormalities and reduced ejection fraction who continue to suffer from severe HF symptoms despite optimal pharmacological therapy. Recent clinical trials have demonstrated that BIV pacing improves myocardial function, functional capacity, quality of life, as well as reduces the incidence of hospitalization and even prolongs life. Despite all this, about one third of patients with HF do not benefit from BIV pacing, the so-called 'non-responders'. Our group and others have shown that there are direct genetic effects of BiV pacing in an animal model, however, there are gaps in existing knowledge about the effects of left ventricular (LV) pacing site or genetic influences on the degree of response to this novel therapy. This proposal aims at identifying predictors of benefit from Biventricular (BIV) pacing with the goal of optimizing the degree of benefit and increasing the proportion of patients who respond to this therapy. Patients who fulfill current indications for BIV pacing will undergo and echocardiography (echo) with regional tissue Doppler analysis and cardiac imaging consisting of a myocardial perfusion imaging(EGC rest gated Spect scan using Sestamibi) prior to implantation of a BIV pacing device. They will then be randomly assigned to empiric versus echo and Spect scan-guided LV lead positioning. In this latter group, optimal LV pacing site will be defined as the site of latest peak tissue velocity by tissue Doppler echo and Spect scan testing. In the empiric group, the LV lead position will be chosen by the masked operator based on the coronary sinus venous anatomy, on electrocardiographic (ECG) criteria, or other as per standard of care. Blood would be collected from all patients at the time of the procedure for analysis of genetic polymorphisms.
Patients with heart failure have a pumping action of the ventricles in which one ventricle contracts before the other ventricle. This uncoordinated (unsynchronized) pumping is due to a delay in the stimulation of the left ventricle because of its increased size. Pacing both the right and the left side of the heart (or cardiac resynchronization therapy \[CRT\]) has been proven to be effective in the treatment of heart failure (HF). Current market-approved devices combine both pacing (CRT) and shocking (implantable cardioverter defibrillator \[ICD\]) therapy for patients who have severe heart failure and are at risk for developing life-threatening heart rhythms. These devices provide an electrical pacing stimulus to both ventricles and may help the heart contract in a more coordinated way and improve heart failure symptoms. The investigational portion of this trial involves the implantation of a market-approved CRT implantable cardioverter defibrillator (CRT-D) system in patients who do not meet the current criteria for a CRT implant. In order to receive a CRT-D implant today, patients must have heart failure symptoms, have a weakened heart muscle, and have uncoordinated pumping of the heart. To demonstrate this uncoordinated pumping of the heart, a test (electrocardiogram \[ECG\]) is done. It is believed that by using a different test (echocardiogram) to measure whether this uncoordinated pumping is present, more patients will be identified that will benefit from CRT-D therapy. This study will look at whether patients identified by using this echocardiogram test show a benefit from having this CRT-D therapy.
This is a prospective, randomized crossover study. The objective of the study is to determine if a pacing rate of 80 beats per minute (bpm) improves exercise tolerance during the 6-minute walk test. The investigators will randomly assign half of the participants to a starting rate of 60 bpm and then switch them to a rate of 80 bpm for 3 months, and vice versa.