6 Clinical Trials for Various Conditions
The purpose of this study is to determine the feasibility of introducing voluntary medical male circumcision as a form of HIV prevention in high HIV prevalence areas in the Dominican Republic.
The purpose of this study is to compare two commonly used circumcision clamps (Gomco and Mogen) to see which results in less neonatal pain.
The purpose of the study is: AIM 1: To engage Papuan community members to explore acceptability, barriers and facilitators for introducing a school-based age and culturally appropriate, comprehensive VMMC intervention to reduce HIV incidence in the Papuan population. AIM 2: To assess the capacity of the community health system to meet international criteria for safe comprehensive VMMC services and to ensure the availability of resources and training necessary to meet these criteria in selected clinics. AIM 3: To design the PIM of school-based adolescent VMMC based on information collected in Aims 1 and 2 and in consultation with a community advisory board, the Ministry of Health and the Ministry of Education. AIM 4: To pilot-test the school-based PIM Intervention of VMMC with 400 boys ages 12-18 years at two HIV high-risk Papuan locations: the Nabire and Jayapura. Primary outcomes are the proportion of adolescent males exposed to school-based PIM VMMC educational and informational sessions who get circumcised and surgical event safety. Secondary outcomes are satisfaction by adolescent males and parents, any sexual activity within 6 weeks after circumcision, changes in sexual risk behaviors between base-line and 12 weeks after circumcision, and perceptions of providers regarding MC training and implementation, ease of device use, and challenges encountered.
The primary objective is to evaluate the effect of clonidine on the duration of analgesia provided by a high volume-low concentration caudal block for pediatric aurgical procedres. In addition, caudal clonidine's effect on length of recovery and post-operative emergence agitation will be measured.
MP3 Youth is a pilot study to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a gender-specific combination HIV prevention package for youth (aged 15-24) in high burden settings. The study aims to pilot a combination package of gender-specific interventions in western Kenya in a mobile health delivery format using integrated services delivery.
The American Academy of Pediatrics changed their stance on circumcision to "health benefits of newborn male circumcision outweigh the risks and that the procedure's benefits justify access to this procedure for families who choose it" (AAP, 2012). We wonder if parents are aware of guidelines such as those of the AAP. Are parents able to make this medical decision by weighing the risks against the benefits of circumcision, or do they simply use sociocultural/religious reasons to make this decision? We hypothesize that parents are unaware of the specific benefits and risks of circumcision, and make this decision based primarily on sociocultural, religious, and/or familial norms. Expectant parents' knowledge will be assessed via a Qualtrics survey. Participants will be recruited in the OB/GYN clinic sometime between their 24-28 week prenatal visit. We hope to accrue at least 680 participants for this study in order to achieve statistical significance and acquire a range of demographics. Expectant mothers and fathers (and single mothers) will be encouraged to participate. This survey will assess their desire to get their child circumcised when they are born. Participants will be asked to list perceived risks and benefits of circumcision. This will hopefully allow us to see two things: if parents are aware and knowledgeable of the risks and benefits or circumcision, and what they perceive to be risky or beneficial from a medical standpoint. Parents will be randomly given 1 of 2 pieces of information (1 per couple \[or per single mother\]; 1 control, 1 experiment) with different information about circumcision. We will see if there are any outcome differences based on which group the couple randomized into. Follow-up phone call will serve to assess outcome if baby was circumcised and any factors that led up to the decision. This will allow us to see if the AAP stance has any effect on decision making when we compare the control and experiment groups.