8 Clinical Trials for Various Conditions
The goal of this pilot clinical trial is to learn if a community informed designed program of addiction counseling with coordinated community peer navigator for people with Opioid Use Disorder (OUD) and other medical conditions can improve engagement in primary care and retention on buprenorphine. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Does the addition of a counseling and peer referral interventions in addition to usual primary care with low-threshold buprenorphine increase retention on medications for opioid use disorder? * Does the addition of counseling and peer referral intervention in addition to usual primary care with low-threshold buprenorphine increase engagement in primary care? Researchers will compare the MOUD "Plus" intervention compared to primary care treatment as usual low-threshold buprenorphine prescribing practice to see if MOUD "Plus" improves retention and engagement. Participants will upon screening and enrollment: * Meet with prescribers who will determine dose of buprenorphine and assess other medical issues as per treatment as usual with visits every 2-4 weeks * Meet with the integrated addictions counselor to develop rapport and support around clinic engagement, brief counseling intervention, and coordination of care in support of their MOUD * Be referred to a community based peer who meets with participants outside the clinic for support and advocacy for patient directed recovery goals * Meet with the research coordinator at 2, 3, and 6 months to complete follow-up surveys about their care and experiences
Communication between physicians caring for a patient in the hospital and that patient's primary care provider is less than optimal, and can lead to diminished health care quality and safety. This project will lead to better communication between physicians and could decrease medication errors that tend to occur as the patient goes from hospital to home.
This is a pragmatic trial that will measure if the use of AI to identify patients with complex care needs and language barriers, as well as active reaching out to clinicians to offer the use of interpreter services will improve the frequency of interpreter use and reduce the time to first interpreter use
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of diazepam in the management of refractory epilepsy in selected patients who require intermittent medical intervention for the control of episodes of acute repetitive seizures. In addition, to assess the support provided by caregivers who are not themselves or not under the direct supervision of health care professionals at the time of administration.
Under the auspice of 'Specially for Children and with funding from the Seton Healthcare Family, Children's Comprehensive Care (CCC) in Austin, Texas, has developed a coordinated and integrated model of care for children with medical complexity. This model serves as the patient's Medical Home (primary care provider, (PCP)), and uses extensivists (physicians who work as hospitalists and within the PCP) and nurse practitioners to provide continuous care between hospital and primary care. This model seeks to provide a system of care that more fully meets the complex needs of the child and family, while implementing innovations in care delivery, fully implementing family-centered practice, and "embedding" behavioral, psychiatric, psychosocial, and palliative care. This study is a randomized intervention trial that evaluates the effectiveness of the newly-created Children's Comprehensive Care on two outcomes: utilization and cost of care; and, evaluation of the experience of parents and their families.
Patients who have advanced or multiple chronic illnesses present management difficulties for primary care providers. Acute medical issues and limited time for patient evaluation can complicate complete assessment of physical symptoms that directly impact a patient's quality of life. The Cook County Health and Hospitals System (CCHHS) established an Advanced Illness Management Clinic to provide care for complex patients. Patient entry into the Advanced Illness Management Clinic is by referral only, a passive process. After discharge, general medicine clinic patients who do not have a medical provider are given an appointment in the clinic. Since the hospital is the source of many patients, this guarantees that these patients will have at least one illness advanced enough to require hospitalization, and most will have additional chronic illnesses. An outpatient palliative care clinic located in a specialty clinic setting was initiated in 2004. The goal of the clinic was to extend the benefits realized by hospital patients, for whom palliative care consultation has been available for many years, to patients cared for in the outpatient setting. The benefits provided include physical symptom management, spiritual counseling, and support for social issues. Until recently, this outpatient palliative care model has mainly served patients with malignancy. With the addition of the Advanced Illness Management Clinic, palliative care clinicians now can provide care to patients with other chronic and serious illness in the primary care setting. Hypothesis: Complex patients will have improved quality of life and a reduced symptom burden if seen by a multidisciplinary clinic post-hospitalization, compared to usual care in a general medicine clinic.
This study assessed whether a medical education intervention improves the quality of medical decision making in the care of patients with complex psychosocial -- or contextual -- needs that are essential to address when planning their care. A group of internal medicine residents were randomly assigned to participate in the seminar and practicum and then they, along with a control group that had not participated, were assessed for the quality of their clinical decision making and its impact on patient care. The study also assessed whether contextualization of care is associated with better patient health care outcomes
This is a single-site, stratified grouping parallel- randomized control trial design comparing 30-day all-cause readmission rates and parent experience with two groups of pediatric participants.