17 Clinical Trials for Various Conditions
The study is an Observational, Phase 0 designed to establish that the risk for diabetic retinopathy assigned by the RiskAnalyzer improves the reading accuracy and consistency of any reader and it decreases the inter-reader variability. Objectives: Objectives one, two, and three are arranged chronologically and in an increasing level of complexity as a three tiered approach to support the primary and secondary endpoint of the trial. Objective one is to test fully each system components of the study limited to a single site. Objective two is to evaluate the efficacy of the RiskAnalyzer to assign the risk of Diabetic Retinopathy in comparison to the gold standard. Objective three is to demonstrate that the reader's accuracy in grading images is improved when risk levels assigned by the RiskAnalyzer are made available to the reader while performing the grading of the images which is the primary endpoint of the trial Methods and Research Design: A network of clinical study sites will be established to meet the required number of cases needed as calculated by statistical analysis. Male and Female Subjects between the ages of 18-65 who are either pre-diabetic or diabetics will be eligible for participation in this study. Subjects will be recruited, consented, photographed and their images graded by two trained readers and analyzed by the RiskAnalyzer . The risk levels that are obtained from the RiskAnalyzer will be compared to the current gold standard practice, manual grading of each case by a reader. Data collected during this clinical trial will be reported to the referring physician in the form of a retinal screening report completed and signed by a licensed Ophthalmic professional and delivered to their attending physician. Risk levels for diabetic retinopathy obtained by use of the RiskAnalyzer will not be given to the attending physician under any circumstances in order to preserve standard of care for the patient. The sensitivity, specificity, receiver operating characteristic (ROC), and data flow process of the RiskAnalyzer, retinal image reading system will be analyzed and based on the current gold standard of a human reader. This study is a three-aims study, 24 month in length, prospective, case-only study of the performance of the RiskAnalyzer. The risk levels obtained from the RiskAnalyzer are not made visible, i.e. are not unmasked to either of the two readers. In year two, the risk levels obtained from the RiskAnalyzer for half of the studies are unmasked to the two readers while grading the image. Access to all study data and processes follows a role-based design. The clinical staff will have access only to clinical data but not the technical data. The technical team will have access to the technical data only but not the clinical data. The study coordinator will have access to all data. The use of computers will adhere to the Guidance for Industry Computerized Systems Used in Clinical Investigations and applicable sections of 21 CFRs part 11.
The purpose of this study is to see if repeat bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccinations can confer a beneficial immune and metabolic effect on Type 1 diabetes. Published Phase I data on repeat BCG vaccinations in long term diabetics showed specific death of some of the disease causing bad white blood cells and also showed a short and small pancreas effect of restored insulin secretion. In this Phase II study, the investigators will attempt to vaccinate more frequently to see if these desirable effects can be more sustained. Eligible volunteers will either be vaccinated with BCG in a repeat fashion over a period of four years, or receive a placebo treatment. The investigators hypothesize that each BCG vaccination will eliminate more and more of the disease causing white blood cells that could offer relief to the pancreas for increased survival and restoration of insulin secretion from the pancreas. An additional adaptive trial for COVID-19 is also being conducted on these randomized double blinded type 1 diabetic subjects receiving BCG or placebo injections. An expanded study arm has been approved for repeat dosing of BCG in adult Type I diabetes.
The purpose of this study is to investigate if repeat bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccinations can confer a beneficial immune and metabolic effect on pediatric Type 1 diabetes.
Behavioral family therapy, specifically focused on insuring support for the primary caregiver of a child with type one diabetes mellitus and healthy family dynamics, may improve the child's glycemic control as measured by hemoglobin A1c level (HbA1c).
The investigators have identified a support group on social media with \~1500 members (children and adults), the majority of whom have T1DM and follow a carbohydrate-restricted diet. Many participants report exceptionally low HbA1C and insulin requirements. If these anecdotal reports are reflective of a large group of people with type 1 diabetes, a clinical trial would be warranted. The investigators propose to survey the above-mentioned group and their professional diabetes care providers to characterize glycemic control and explore associated dietary and diabetes care factors.
The purpose of this study is to investigate if repeat bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccinations can confer a beneficial immune and metabolic effect in new onset pediatric Type 1 diabetes.
ECLIPSE will evaluate the clinical and economic value of OneTouch Solutions in a real world study design. OneTouch Solutions describes a selection of devices and health and wellness solutions that people with diabetes (PWDs) can access online via OneTouch Solutions (Cecelia Health, Fitbit, Noom or Welldoc, each in combination with OneTouch Verio Reflect® blood glucose meter and the OneTouch Reveal® mobile app (or Welldoc app for the Welldoc arm)). ECLIPSE is a large parallel arm digital health study combining advanced blood glucose monitoring solutions with a choice of four different health and wellness applications or services. There are four unique study arms that will run in parallel over one year. The primary (A1c) endpoint for each study arm will be after 6 months and subjects will continue to use the interventions for a full year to generate data on sustained engagement with these products and services, and to collect healthcare utilization and health insurance claims information. Each study arm will differ to some degree in terms of patient baseline demographics (since subjects self-select their own app/intervention) and the experience per arm will be unique, and therefore each study arm will be analysed separately in terms of endpoints and outcomes.
The Fit-One trial involves three prospective, randomized waitlist-controlled studies. These studies evaluate the effects of One Drop's digital therapeutics solution with and without Fitbit devices on the social cognitive, behavioral, and health outcomes of people with diabetes. Fit-One is being tested on adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) of all weights, and adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) or pre-diabetes that are overweight or obese (BMI ≥ 25).
The A-One study is a prospective, randomized controlled trial evaluating the use of the One Drop \| Premium 'On Track' in combination with Afrezza treatment on the glycemic control, treatment adherence, social-cognitive barriers to adherence, and treatment satisfaction of people with Type 2 diabetes (T2D) and a hemoglobin A1c (A1c) \> 7.0% already prescribed an injectable rapid-acting insulin.
The One Drop Experts Program for Type 2 Diabetes Self-Management Impact on A1c trial is a 12-week long, prospective, intent-to-treat study that aims to evaluate the impact of the One Drop app and Experts program on HbA1c levels for individuals with uncontrolled Type 2 diabetes. A secondary objective will be to evaluate participants who utilize an Apple Watch in combination with the One Drop app and Experts program, and assess whether this group is more engaged or experiences a different impact as compared to participants who utilized the One Drop app and Experts program only.
This study is conducted in the United States of America (USA). The aim of this study is to assess longitudinal variation of immune biomarkers in subjects with type 1 diabetes (T1D), type 2 diabetes (T2D) and healthy, non-diabetic subjects over a one year period.
28 subjects to be enrolled for a screening period, 3 dosing visits \& a follow-up visit. Visits 2 and 3 dosing of TI Inhalation Powder, cross over between two 15 U cartridges and one 30 U cartridge. Visit 4 dosing will be a sc injection of 10 IU of RAA (rapid-acting insulin analogue).
This is an open-label study that will measure blood levels of different parts of a drug called GKS189075. People participating in this study will receive a single dose of 250mg GSK189075 by mouth. About 20 people with mild to moderate decrease in renal (kidney) function will be asked to participate in this study. They will be compared to about 20 healthy participants who are close to the same age and body size. People participating in this study will stay at a clinical research unit beginning 2 days before they receive their single dose of GSK189075 and will remain there until approximately one day after receiving the study drug. During this study urine will be collected beginning the day before receiving study drug until the day after, just prior to leaving the clinical research unit. Blood samples will also be collected at various times beginning immediately before until 24 hours after receiving the study drug.
Sirolimus can be safely switched as early as 90 days after liver transplantation with excellent tolerability and amelioration of the calcineurin inhibitor toxicity that initiated the switch.
The purpose of the study is to evaluate patient adherence with discharge diabetes medications up to 120 days following pharmacist counseling during hospital stay about diabetes self management
The purposes of this study are to determine: 1. If patients taking insulin lispro LM with metformin will have better overall control of their blood sugar than patients taking a long acting insulin comparator with metformin. 2. If there is a difference in the way the two treatments affect blood sugar control before and after meals and at night. 3. If there is a difference in the insulin dose required with the two treatments. 4. If there is a difference in the numbers of times patients experience low blood sugar with the two treatments. 5. If there is a difference in the effect on patients's body weight.
The study is being conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of IND068 once daily (QD) in subjects with type 2 diabetes not adequately controlled with one or two oral antidiabetics compared to insulin degludec QD for 16 weeks.