4 Clinical Trials for Various Conditions
The purpose of this study is to determine if avascular necrosis of the acetabulum is present in metal-on-metal revisions and to what depth this dead avascular bone occurs. A convenient sample of a consecutive series of 15 patients treated for metal on metal acetabular revision surgery will be included.
The purpose of the study is to develop a biomarker assay to be used as a diagnostic tool for adverse local tissue reaction, or tissue necrosis, in a metal on metal total hip replacement. A convenience sample of a total of 100 hip patients will be enrolled: 50 metal-on-metal revision hips, 25 metal-on-poly revision hips, and 25 pre-operative total hips (no implant, control group) will be enrolled. Preoperative blood serum samples and intraoperative synovial fluid will be obtained from all hips and used for biomarker testing. Additionally, intraoperative assessment of tissue necrosis will be assessed.
The specific aim is to quantify the stability of the acetabular and femoral components of a revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) in vivo as currently performed at our institution. In this way, the investigators will gain insight into the outcome of the current state of the art of revision arthroplasty surgery. In the past, acetabular and femoral component stability has been measured using radiostereometric analysis (RSA) and when patients having revision total hip operations were compared to patients undergoing primary total hip operations it was possible to determine differences in stability and this was predictive of the intermediate to long-term performance of the acetabular and femoral reconstruction. The investigators propose to use this established, high resolution technique to assess and compare the stability of the revision implants.
This study occurs in two phases. Phase 1 involves initial item development and measurement validation of a new tool for identifying hospitalized patients at high risk for preventable readmission. Primary tasks include item construction and content validation, data collection, analysis, and instrument refinement. Phase 2 involves administering the refined instrument to a new group of patients to determine final item content for the instrument, its factor structure, and its predictive validity.