8 Clinical Trials for Various Conditions
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) is a widely accepted treatment that has led to improved clinical outcomes for patients with refractory congestive heart failure (CHF), systolic dysfunction, and wide QRS duration. However, it requires implantation of an expensive device ($30,000) and about 1/3 of patients do not have clinical improvement. Inadequate amounts of LV dyssynchrony or suboptimal lead placement may limit clinical response. Dual-Source computed tomography (DSCT) allows for subtle detection during myocardial contraction for assessing LV dyssynchrony, and can also assess coronary venous anatomy and scar burden. Thus DSCT may be the ideal noninvasive modality to predict response to CRT.
This study is intended to evaluate the impact of passive continuous remote patient monitoring to assist in the outpatient management of heart failure (HF) patients.
The goal of this study is improving patient-centered communication for young people with advanced heart disease.
In order to determine if NfL can be a prognostic biomarker for VCID, participants will undergo a baseline evaluation consisting of neuropsychological testing and a blood draw with a 12-month follow-up consisting of neuropsychological testing and blood draw. After indicated interest in the study, participants will be screened either in person during a regularly scheduled clinic visit or by phone for eligibility. After consenting, participants will be scheduled for a baseline testing session. One session, lasting about 3 hrs, will include neuropsychological testing and a blood draw. After completion of baseline testing, participants who agree to take part in the clinical trial will begin a 12-week treatment of Ang-(1-7) via daily subcutaneous injections. During the drug treatment, participants will be called weekly to ensure that everything is going well with the injections. After participants have completed the 12-week injection period, participants will be scheduled for a second appointment which will include a blood draw and neuropsychological testing. All participant will be scheduled for a 12-month follow-up, which will include a blood draw and neuropsychological testing. Participants will be called every second month by research staff for a brief update on changes to health status, and to increase compliance with the 12-month follow-up. Our One-Year outcome for this study is to provide early proof-of-concept clinical trial data that will support a larger, more comprehensive NIH funded study on the safety and efficacy of Ang-(1-7) to prevent cognitive impairment in HF patients at risk for developing VCID/ADRD. Our Long-Term outcome is to demonstrate whether plasma NfL exhibits characteristics making it useful as a Prognostic Biomarker to predict cognitive decline in early heart disease-associated VCID and identify pre VCID-symptomatic in individuals with symptomatic HF. Our goal will be to use levels of plasma Nfl as an enrollment enrichment factor in future trials to allow enrollment or stratification of patients more likely to develop VCID or ADRD and be responsive to Ang-(1-7) therapy.
The GUIDE-HF IDE clinical trial is intended to demonstrate the effectiveness of the CardioMEMS™ HF System in an expanded patient population including heart failure (HF) patients outside of the present indication, but at risk for future HF events or mortality.
The study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of both aliskiren monotherapy and aliskiren/enalapril combination therapy as compared to enalapril monotherapy, on morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic heart failure (NYHA Class II - IV.
Whether patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) should be anticoagulated is one of the oldest unresolved questions in cardiovascular therapeutics. Some authorities do not recommend anticoagulation for CHF patients in sinus rhythm, others recommend anticoagulation in patients with primary cardiomyopathy, and still others consider it more appropriate in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). This absence of consensus reflects the lack of evidence in this area and different outlooks on the objectives of such therapy (e.g., prevention of arterial emboli or reduction in vascular events).
The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of the HeartMate II (HM II) Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD) support versus OMM in ambulatory NYHA Class IIIB/IV heart failure patients who are not dependent on intravenous inotropic support and who meet the FDA approved indications for HM II LVAD destination therapy.