13 Clinical Trials for Various Conditions
This pilot phase I trial studies the side effects and best way to give sirolimus, gemcitabine hydrochloride, and cisplatin in treating patients at high risk for cholangiocarcinoma recurrence after liver transplant or surgery. Sirolimus may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as gemcitabine hydrochloride, and cisplatin, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Giving sirolimus with gemcitabine hydrochloride and cisplatin may prevent disease recurrence in patients with a high risk of recurrence after a liver transplant or surgery.
This phase I trial is studying the side effects and best dose of temsirolimus in treating patients with metastatic solid tumor or lymphoma that cannot be removed by surgery who have different levels of liver function. Temsirolimus may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. Temsirolimus may have different effects in patients who have changes in their liver function
Bortezomib may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking the enzymes necessary for their growth. This phase I trial is studying the side effects and best dose of bortezomib in treating patients with advanced cancer and liver dysfunction.
This phase I trial studies the side effects and best dose of dabrafenib in treating patients with solid tumors and kidney or liver dysfunction. Dabrafenib may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth.
Sinusoidal Obstruction Syndrome (SOS), also referred to as hepatic veno-occlusive disease (VOD), is rare but serious complication of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). Defibrotide is the only FDA approved therapy to treat SOS and has significantly improved outcomes. When applied early, SOS symptoms often quickly improve and an abbreviated course can be applied. This study is looking at an abbreviated 5 day course of defibrotide in those patients with a complete response to therapy with the primary outcome being day 100 overall survival as compared to history data.
Hepatic veno-occlusive disease/sinusoidal obstructive syndrome (VOD/SOS) is a potentially fatal complication of hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT). Historically VOD/SOS has been clinically diagnosed using the modified Seattle criteria or the Baltimore criteria. The modified Seattle Criteria define VOD/SOS diagnosis is made when two of the following three criteria are present in a patient within 21 days of transplantation: hyperbilirubinemia (total serum bilirubin \> 2 mg/dL), hepatomegaly or right upper quadrant liver pain, and weight gain (\> 2% of baseline) or ascites. Other conditions like graft versus host disease, sepsis syndrome (fever and hypotension), cardiac failure, or tumor infiltration) have to be excluded. This definition was from a well-designed retrospective cohort study on 255 adult and pediatric HCT patients in which the VOD/SOS incidence was 21%. McDonald et al followed up this work with a prospective cohort study of 355 patients noting an incidence of VOD/SOS of 54%. These seminal studies have had a major impact on the field by defining clinical diagnostic criteria. An alternative diagnostic criteria (Baltimore criteria) was proposed by Jones et al as a part of a well-designed retrospective review of 235 HCT patients finding a VOD/SOS incidence of 22%. Jones defined VOD/SOS as the presence of hyperbilirubinemia (total serum bilirubin \> 2 mg/dL) along with at least 2 of 3 other findings: hepatomegaly, ascites, and weight gain (\> 5% of baseline).
To perform an receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, define a threshold and quantify the sensitivity and specificity of US SWE for risk stratification of patients into three categories as defined by the European Bone Marrow Transplant (EBMT) adult and pediatric criteria: no sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS), mild to moderate SOS, and severe to very severe SOS. Secondarily, the investigators would also like to quantify the temporal relationship between US SWE changes and SOS diagnosis according to various clinical criteria (Modified Seattle, Baltimore, EBMT consortium).
This study is being done to find out if the laxative polyethylene glycol (also known as GoLYTELY® or Miralax®) can treat your hepatic encephalopathy (confusion due to your liver disease and/or cirrhosis) better and/or more safely than lactulose (another laxative). In this study, the investigators will evaluate if polyethylene glycol (GoLYTELY®) is more effective than lactulose on neurocognition (memory and thinking skills) and determine if it decreases the hospital stay.
Rifaximin therapy will improve brain functioning on MRI scanning and change the microbiome and metabolome.
This research proposes to find whether the probiotic lactobacillus GG is safe and well tolerated in patients with minimal hepatic encephalopathy. We also want to get insight into the mechanisms of action of LGG.
Lipodystrophies represent a therapeutic challenge with regards to the management of the diabetes, insulin resistance, hypertriglyceridemia and fatty liver which frequently present in conjunction with significant adipose tissue loss. The purpose of the study and it's four subprojects is to examine the safety and efficacy of various novel interventions designed to improve or resolve the fatty liver, hypertriglyceridemia, and insulin resistance or diabetes that is seen in these patients.
The ELASTO-SURGERY study aims to evaluate the prognostic role of portal hypertension evaluated by non-invasive methods in predicting post-operative morbidity (at 90 days) and mortality (at 365 days) in patients with advanced chronic liver disease undergoing elective extrahepatic surgery.
Analgesics and sedatives administered to control distress from minimally invasive surgical procedures have limited effectiveness and serious side effects. Unabated distress not only interferes with smooth progression of the ongoing procedure, but can elicit adverse responses when patients need additional intervention. The long-term objective of this research is to provide a safe and practical behavioral method for reducing cognitive and physiologic distress associated with invasive procedures. Currently, this method should benefit at least 8 million patients annually in the US. Extrapolating the risk of intravenous conscious sedation to the number of invasive procedures performed annually, we predict that 47,000 patients will suffer serious cardiorespiratory complications and 2,600 will die. These numbers do not include effects of the psychological damage inflicted by poorly managed procedure-related stress on patients' subsequent health behavior. This application sets out to pursue three aims: 1) Prospectively determine the impact of self-hypnotic relaxation on cognitive and physiologic distress during tumor embolizations; 2) Prospectively determine the impact of self-hypnotic relaxation on distress in the postoperative period; 3) Determine the impact of intraprocedural self-hypnotic relaxation on distress during subsequent tumor embolization. We hypothesize that: 1) Self-hypnotic relaxation decreases cognitive and physiologic distress during tumor embolizations. 2) Self-hypnotic relaxation decreases cognitive and physiologic distress after tumor embolization when post-embolization ischemia is expected to induce painful stimuli and systemic distress. 3) The beneficial effect of self-hypnotic coping skills acquired during an invasive procedure carries over to the next invasive procedure. Upon completion, the efficacy and durability of procedural administration of nonpharmacologic analgesia will be known by a rigorous and practical assessment. The relative performance of self-hypnotic relaxation will be quantified compared to standard care and empathic controls in a well-characterized population of patients within the controlled and monitored environment of a busy interventional radiology practice. Results from this competing renewal will provide the next level of data needed for future study design to determine broad clinical utility in a multicenter randomized controlled trial.