21 Clinical Trials for Various Conditions
Most people develop high blood sugars following liver transplant that requires treatment with insulin in the hospital, even if they don't have diabetes, due to stress and use of steroid medications. High blood sugar levels can be treated with a hormone that the body makes called insulin. This study is being done to determine if maintaining normal blood sugar levels after transplant for as long as needed while in the hospital results in a lesser incidence of death, infections, transplanted liver rejection or failure or need for rehospitalization within 90 days after transplant.
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn about the benefits of using aa Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) system in patients with diabetes following discharge from the hospital. The main question it aims to answer is: • If the use of CGM with alarms is safe and effective for managing low and/or high blood sugars when compared with performing finger sticks several times per day Participants will wear one or two FreeStyle Libre CGM sensors for 12-14 days three times over a 12-week (3 month) period. This means that they will have the one to two sensors inserted under their skin. They will be asked to come to the study site four times and complete two phone calls with research staff over the 12-week period. Researchers will compare the LibreView CGM group to the Standard of Care group to see if the use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) reduces risk of low blood sugar in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) after hospital discharge when compared with the current standard method.
This study is a prospective, randomized, open label trial to compare the safety and efficacy of linagliptin (an oral anti diabetic medication) given orally once daily to an insulin regimen of glargine once daily plus rapid-acting insulin before meals. Both of these treatment groups will be given corrective doses of rapid-acting insulin analogs (aspart, lispro or glulisine) before meals if their blood sugars are \> 140 mg/dl. The patients will be monitored for their blood sugars while the hospital. If patients are agreeable to participate in the discharge part of the study, the investigators will randomized them to a treatment group based on their admission HbA1c. The investigators will follow these patients for 3 months with phone calls and clinic visits, and will monitor their blood sugars. This is to compare the efficacy of linagliptin and our discharge treatment algorithm in controlling blood sugars as out patients.
High blood glucose levels in hospitalized patients with diabetes are associated with increased risk of medical complications and death. Improved glucose control with insulin injections may improve clinical outcome and prevent some of the hospital complications. Glargine (Lantus®) insulin injection is the most common treatment of diabetes in the hospital. Sitagliptin (Januvia®)is effective in lowering blood glucose. In a recent pilot study aiming to determine differences in glycemic control between treatment with sitagliptin (Januvia®) alone or in combination with basal insulin and basal bolus regimen in general medicine and surgery patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). The investigators found that treatment with sitagliptin alone or in combination with basal insulin resulted in similar glycemic control compared to basal bolus regimen. The investigators will conduct a prospective RCT aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of sitagliptin therapy for in-hospital and post-discharge management of general medicine and surgical patients with T2D. A total of 280 patients with known history of diabetes will be randomized to receive sitagliptin plus basal (glargine) insulin once daily (group 1), or basal bolus regimen with glargine once daily and aspart or lispro insulin before meals (group 2). If needed, patients in the treatment groups will receive correction doses of rapid-acting insulin in the presence of hyperglycemia (BG \> 140 mg/dl). The overall hypothesis is that treatment with sitagliptin in combination with basal insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes will result in a similar improvement in hospital and post-discharge glycemic control and in a lower frequency of hypoglycemic events than treatment with basal bolus insulin regimen with glargine once daily and lispro insulin before meals. Patients will be recruited at Grady Memorial Hospital, Emory University Hospital, University of Michigan, Ohio State University and Temple University
The purpose of this study is to compare the use of insulin glargine plus insulin lispro to human regular insulin for treatment of hyperglycemia in the hospital setting in patients without known prior history of diabetes.
Many hospitals have begun giving insulin to nearly all patients with diabetes while they are in the hospital even if a patient does not use insulin at home. Controlling blood sugar with insulin when a patient is hospitalized is believed to reduce the risk of complications and death, but research has not demonstrated these benefits except in patients who are critically ill. The purpose of this study, therefore, is to evaluate whether such insulin therapy actually does reduce in-hospital complications, deaths, need for intensive care, or length of stay in the hospital.
The objective of this study is to determine the best insulin regimen for hospitalized patients who receive high doses of steroids who have high blood glucose.
This study aims to improve patient awareness of the utility of continuous glucose monitoring systems in blood glucose monitoring and to improve patient satisfaction regarding diabetes care, particularly in the matter of blood glucose monitoring, at the transitions of care from the inpatient setting to the ambulatory setting.
Inpatient management of glycemia in people with diabetes has been inadequately studied. Previous randomized trials of intensive insulin therapy in the hospital setting resulted in excessive hypoglycemia. Current ADA guidelines (glucose 140-180 mg/dL) are by consensus with the upper bound defined by observational data and the lower bound by safety concerns. None of the previous studies of intensive glucose management used CGM technology. Whether near normal glucose levels can be achieved without increasing hypoglycemia among hospitalized patients with diabetes with the advent of CGM technology is not known. There are clear associations between hyperglycemia and poor outcomes in patients with diabetes hospitalized with infection, including COVID-19. The COVID-19 pandemic has increased the urgency to definitively answer the question of whether glucose lowering below 140-180 mg/dL can be achieved without increasing hypoglycemia. If this proposed study demonstrates intensive management of glucose to a target of 90 to 130 mg/dL without hypoglycemia is achievable in the inpatient setting with CGM technology, a larger study could then be performed to evaluate whether there is clinical benefit including a reduction in morbidity and mortality. The primary study hypothesis is that glucose management with CGM can achieve a mean glucose of 90-130 mg/dL without increasing hypoglycemia compared with standard care with a glucose target of 140-180 mg/dL. Individuals with diabetes who are hospitalized (non-ICU) for an eligible condition will be randomly assigned to receive standard therapy (glucose target 140-180 mg/dL per ADA guidelines) or intensive therapy (glucose target 90-130 mg/dL and CGM used for monitoring). Real-time CGM will be used in the Intensive Target Group and masked CGM will be used in the Standard Target Group. The co-primary outcomes, assessed via a hierarchical approach, include a treatment group comparison of mean glucose (superiority) followed by a non-inferiority comparison of time \<54 mg/dL measured with CGM.
The purpose of this study is to look at feasibility (the likelihood) of continued use of the FreeStyle Libre 2 Continuous glucose monitor (CGM) when started at the time of hospital discharge in patients with poorly controlled diabetes and to look at the effects of CGM use on blood glucose control and quality of life. Additional information will be collected to determine the barriers to continuing CGM use after discharge. The investigators will also collect information to see how well blood glucose has been controlled after discharge while utilizing the CGM.
This randomized controlled clinical trial will assess whether continuation of home oral antidiabetic agents during hospitalization can be used as a safe and effective alternative to insulin therapy in the management of diabetes in the hospital. The primary outcome of the study is to determine differences in glycemic control as measured by mean daily blood glucose concentration between oral antidiabetic medications and basal bolus therapy in hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D).
The purpose of this study is to identify and explore the existing components of discharge planning provided to patients with insulin treated diabetes in the inpatient setting and to examine the contribution of glycemic excursions as well as comprehension of discharge instructions among patients with diabetes, in predicting hospital readmissions.
This study will examine the feasibility of implementing a clinician-supported patient self-managed inpatient insulin intervention. It will: assess the number of eligible patients presenting over time; assess patients' willingness to enroll; assess patients' ability to successfully complete the intervention; examine occurrences of hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia; and assess patients' satisfaction with inpatient diabetes care.
The purpose of this study is to assess safety and device performance of the Medtronic Hospital Glucose Management System (HGMS) for up to 72-hours.
Increasing evidence from clinical studies in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) settings indicates that insulin infusion can improve outcome measures for patients with hyperglycemia (high blood sugar) independent of a previous diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. This improvement in health could also apply to patients that have high blood sugars in various other non-critical care areas of the hospital as well. However, the data that shows improvement in health outcomes has been collected from wards that have a lower patient to provider and patient to nurse ratio, resulting in the ability for a much tighter control of the insulin infusion. We hypothesize that tight blood glucose control will provide the same benefits for patients in non-intensive care units settings but that these protocols may lead to a higher incidence of hypoglycemia (low blood sugar) and potentially to adverse outcomes in patients. This study aims to determine the clinical outcome of patients treated with insulin infusion as well as the rate of hypoglycemic episodes in non-intensive areas. We will conduct a chart review of patients treated with insulin infusions in non-critical wards at Emory University Hospital during the period of 7/1/04 to 6/30/05. Medical records of all patients treated with intravenous insulin infusion protocols will be analyzed. Data on demographics, laboratory values, mortality rate, rate of hypoglycemic events, length of stay, as well as disposition at discharge will be analyzed.
The purpose of this study is to determine the impact of an electronic medical record clinical decision support tool on rates of dysglycemia in the hospital, and its clinical and economical outcomes. The study also evaluates the perspectives of providers regarding the tool's usefulness on disease management support, knowledge, and practice performance.
The primary objective of this study is to determine the optimal dose of glargine insulin when converting from intravenous short-acting continuous insulin infusions in surgical and intensive care unit patients using a prospective, controlled, parallel group, randomized study design. Note: Lantus insulin is the proprietary name for glargine insulin.
Individuals with diabetes in the hospital often experience poor glycemic control, which places them at greater risk for infection, neurological and cardiac complications, mortality, longer lengths of stay, readmissions, and higher healthcare costs. There are few effective interventions for monitoring hospital glucose management therefore the long-term goal of developing Cloud-Based Real-Time Glucose Evaluation and Management System is to provide an effective, real-time continuous glucose monitoring solution necessary for clinical decision-making which can be easily managed for clinical risk 24 hrs/day. The innovative intervention will enable hospital care teams to take immediate steps based on wireless transmission of glucose data from the Dexcom G6 device, sent to a Digital Dashboard, where integration with existing real-world hospital processes can provide immediate prioritization to prevent or correct impending hypoglycemia and severe hyperglycemic events. This randomized controlled trial is defined as a Phase III/IV definitive clinical trial to establish efficacy and effectiveness of this intervention. Aim 1 will assess mean differences of % time in range between intervention and Usual Care groups to find occurrence of glucose levels that are in range at 70-200mg/dL. Aim 2 will apply the same method, using % time above range of \>300mg/dL (severe hyperglycemia) and % time below range \<70mg/dL (hypoglycemia). Poor glycemic control in the hospital is common and given the known consequences of uncontrolled blood sugars during a hospitalization, health systems devote significant resources to developing protocols for improving glucometrics. The likely impact of this innovative research is to have an efficient, and seamless alternative for continually monitoring glucose levels in the hospital. The Digital Dashboard facilitates real-time, remote monitoring of a large volume of patients simultaneously; automatically identifies and prioritizes patients for intervention; and will detect any and all potentially dangerous hypoglycemic episodes. The work proposed pushes the limits of these challenges by providing evidence, identified by a team-based approach to glucose management in an underserved and understudied population supplementing prior data designed to improve outcomes among high-risk patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and related cardio metabolic conditions. The proposed intervention is flexible, sustainable, and has high dissemination potential.
Retrospective nested non-matched case control study comparing patients by glycemic status
Patients with heart failure often have high blood sugar (glucose).
The Vermont Diabetes Information System (VDIS) is a registry-based decision support and reminder system based on the Chronic Care Model and targeted to primary care physicians and their patients with diabetes. It will be evaluated by a randomized, controlled study in 60 Primary Care practices in Vermont and nearby New York.