1,044 Clinical Trials for Various Conditions
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the virus-specific immune response in people who are symptomatic with confirmed influenza or COVID-19. We will study the immune response of people who have and who have not been vaccinated with the seasonal influenza and COVID-19 vaccines within the past year. All participants will have data collected and blood, saliva, and nasal swabs performed at five separate visits; 1) at study enrollment, 2) on study day 7, 3) on or between study days 10 to 28, 4) on study day 90, and 5) on study day 180. For participants who agree to the optional sub-study, bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and endobronchial biopsy (EBBx) will be performed once between study days 10 and 28 and once at study day 180. As part of the bronchoscopy procedure, two chest x-rays will be performed. The bronchoscopy and chest x-ray procedures are not required for participation in the study.
The purpose of this study is to prospectively test whether personalized, message-based nudges can increase flu vaccination compared with nudges that are not personalized or no nudges.
The purpose of this study is to learn if modified RNA (modRNA) vaccines for the prevention of influenza are: * safe; and * how these vaccines produce an immune response in generally healthy adults. Immune response is the way the body protects itself against things it sees as harmful or foreign. RNA (also called ribonucleic acid) is one of two types of nucleic acid made by cells. RNA contains information that has been copied from DNA (the other type of nucleic acid). Cells make several different forms of RNA, and each form has a specific job in the cell. Many forms of RNA have functions related to making proteins. RNA is also the genetic material of some viruses instead of DNA. RNA can be made in the laboratory and used in research studies. Also called ribonucleic acid. Influenza is term used for flu illness. It is an infection caused by a virus that affects your mouth, nose, and throat. The study is seeking for participants who: * are at least 18 years of age * have not received an influenza vaccine within the last 6 months * are generally healthy This study will be divided into three sub-studies: Substudy A (SSA), Substudy B (SSB), and Substudy C (SSC). All participants, regardless of sub-study, will receive 1 dose of either of the following vaccines as an injection into their arm: * 1 of the modRNA influenza vaccines that is being studied; or * an approved influenza vaccine approved for use in their respective age group. Participants will be involved in this study for about 6 months. During this time, participants will have at least 3 clinic visits.
The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and immune response of GlaxoSmithKlines (GSK) messenger RNA (mRNA)-based multivalent vaccine (GSK4382276A) candidate against influenza, administered in healthy younger adults (YA) and older adults (OA).
The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety, reactogenicity and immunogenicity of the Flu Pandemic messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccine (including dose-finding and dose-confirmation) administered in healthy adults 18 to 85 years of age.
The purpose of this clinical trial is to see if combining a licensed COVID-19 vaccine and a licensed influenza vaccine into a single shot is safe and can help produce antibodies to defend the body against both SARS-CoV-2 (the virus that causes COVID-19) and influenza. Participants enrolled in this trial will be healthy adults, 50 years of age or older.
The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and immunogenicity of different formulations of monovalent Influenza A/Astrakhan/3212/2020-like virus vaccine with AS03 adjuvant system in adults greater than or equal to (\>=)18 years of age.
Influenza virus is a significant pathogen in pediatric solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. However, these individuals respond poorly to standard-dose (SD) inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV). Recent studies have investigated two strategies to overcome poor immune responses in SOT recipients: (1) administration of high-dose (HD)-IIV compared to SD-IIV and (2) two doses of SD-IIV compared to one dose of SD-IIV in the same influenza season. One study compared HD-IIV vs. SD-IIV in adult SOT recipients and noted that HD-IIV was safe and more immunogenic; however, the median post-transplant period was 38 months. A phase I pediatric study comparing a single dose of HD-IIV vs. SD-IIV was safe with higher immunogenicity, but the study was limited by small sample size and median post-transplant vaccine administration was 26 months. In another phase II trial of adult SOT recipients, two doses of SD-IIV one month apart compared to one-dose of SD-IIV revealed modestly increased immunogenicity when given at a median of 18 months post-transplant. Therefore, these studies lack both evaluation in the early post-transplant period and substantive pediatric populations. Additionally, the administration of two-doses of HD-IIV in the same influenza season has not been evaluated in pediatric SOT recipients. Thus, the optimal immunization strategy for pediatric SOT recipients less than 24 months post-transplant is unknown. In addition, immunologic predictors and correlates of influenza vaccine immunogenicity in pediatric SOT recipients have not been well-defined. The central hypothesis of our proposal is that pediatric SOT recipients 1-23 months post-transplant who receive two doses of HD-quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (QIV) will have similar safety but higher Hemagglutination Inhibition (HAI) geometric mean titers (GMTs) to influenza antigens compared to pediatric SOT recipients receiving two doses of SD-QIV.
This Phase 1, randomized, observer-blind, dose-ranging clinical study is evaluating 6 different formulations of MF59-adjuvanted and non-adjuvanted H2N3 influenza vaccine. Approximately 600 healthy adult subjects are to be randomized into 1 of 6 possible treatment groups with 100 subjects per group, stratified by age group (born after or before 1968). Each subject will receive an influenza vaccine injection on Day 1 and Day 22. Subjects will be followed up for approximately 12 months after the second vaccine injection. The primary immunogenicity analysis is based on the Day 1, Day 8, Day 22, Day 29, and Day 43 serology data. The primary safety analysis is based on solicited local and systemic adverse events (AEs) reported within 10 days after each vaccination, unsolicited AEs reported within 3 weeks after each vaccination, and serious AEs (SAEs), medically attended AEs (MAAEs), AEs leading to withdrawal from the study, and AEs of special interest (AESIs) reported throughout the study.
This Phase 2, randomized, observer-blind clinical study is evaluating 3 different priming and booster regimens with MF59-adjuvanted H5N8 and/or H5N6 cell culture-derived influenza vaccine (aH5N8c; aH5N6c). Approximately 480 healthy adult subjects are to be randomized into 1 of 3 possible treatment groups, stratified by age group (18-64 years and ≥65 years) and by poultry worker status (yes/no). Each subject will receive a priming influenza vaccine injection on Day 1 and Day 22 and a booster vaccination on Day 202. Subjects will be followed up for approximately 6 months after the booster injection. The primary immunogenicity analysis is based on antibody responses against H5N8 and H5N6 as measured by hemagglutination inhibition (HI) assay on Day 1, Day 22, Day 29, Day 43, Day 202, Day 209 (H5N8 only), and Day 223.
This study intends to describe the characteristics of patients given the Pfizer-BioNTech bivalent mRNA COVID-19 vaccine and any commercially available influenza vaccines at the same time versus at different times.
The purpose of this study is to find and confirm the dose and asses the reactogenicity, safety and immune response of GlaxoSmithKline's (GSK) messenger RNA (mRNA)-based multivalent seasonal influenza vaccine (GSK4382276A) candidates administered in healthy younger and older adults (OA).
Substudy A: This is a Phase 1 randomized, open-label study to describe the safety and immunogenicity of up to 3 dose- level combinations of modRNA quadrivalent influenza vaccine (qIRV (22/23)) and bivalent BNT162b2 (original/Omi BA.4/BA.5). Participants will receive either: * qIRV (22/23)/bivalent BNT162b2 (original/Omi BA.4/BA.5), at 1 of the 3 dose-level combinations * qIRV (22/23) at dose level 1, * qIRV (22/23) at dose level 2, or * bivalent BNT162b2 (original/Omi BA.4/BA.5) at dose level 1 administered concurrently in the opposite arm to commercially licensed quadrivalent influenza vaccine (QIV). Substudy B: This Phase 1/2 study will describe the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of quadrivalent influenza vaccine (qIRV)/bivalent BNT162b2 (original/Omi BA.4/BA.5), trivalent influenza vaccine (tIRV)/bivalent BNT162b2 (original/Omi BA.4/BA.5), and bivalent influenza vaccine (bIRV)/bivalent BNT162b2 (original/Omi BA.4/BA.5) when given concurrently with licensed quadrivalent influenza vaccine (QIV).
This is a Phase 3, randomized, observer-blinded study to evaluate the efficacy, safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of a single dose of a quadrivalent influenza modRNA vaccine compared to licensed inactivated influenza vaccine in healthy adults 18 years of age and older.
This randomized, active comparator trial will compare the clinical efficacy of recombinant influenza vaccine (RIV) to standard-dose egg-based inactivated influenza vaccine (SD IIV) among adults aged 18-64 years. The primary study hypothesis is that the clinical efficacy of RIV is superior to that of SD IIV to prevent and attenuate influenza-like illness (ILI)-associated influenza virus infection. Relative efficacy will be assessed by comparing rates of ILI-associated reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)-confirmed influenza virus infection and measures of infection and illness attenuation among participants who receive RIV versus SD IIV. A secondary hypothesis is that humoral and cell-mediated immune responses to RIV are superior to responses to SD IIV. Relative immunogenicity will be assessed by comparing markers of humoral and cell-mediated immune responses post-vaccination among a subset of participants who receive RIV versus SD IIV.
This Phase 2, randomized, observer-blind, dose-confirmation Clinical study is evaluating different formulations of MF59-Adjuvanted Quadrivalent Subunit Inactivated Influenza Vaccine. Approximately 1000 subjects are to be randomized into 1 of 4 possible treatment groups with 250 participants per group. Every participant will receive an influenza vaccine injection on Day 1 and will be followed up for approximately 6 months following injection. The primary immunogenicity analysis is based on Day 29 serology data.
Background: Influenza, also called flu, is a virus. It can cause mild symptoms such as fever, cough, sore throat, and aches. Sometimes, flu can cause serious complications. Researchers want to see how people s immune systems respond to the flu. Objective: To find the smallest dose of influenza H10N7 virus that may cause an uncomplicated mild to moderate flu infection in healthy people. This dose will be used in the future to test how well new flu vaccines work. Eligibility: Healthy adults age 18-50. Design: Participants will be screened with: Physical exam with vital signs and weight Medical and medicine review Blood and urine tests Electrocardiogram to measure the heart s electrical activity. Screening tests will be repeated during the study. Participants will be tested for SARS-CoV-2 and other respiratory infections. For this, a swab will be inserted into the back of the nose. Participants will be admitted to an isolation room in the Clinical Center. They will stay in the hospital for at least 10 days. They will not have visitors. Participants may have a heart ultrasound. They may have lung function tests. For this, they will blow into a tube to measure lung capacity. One dose of the flu virus will be sprayed into participants nostrils. Participants will be monitored 24 hours a day. They will give nasal samples (using nasal washes and brushes) and blood samples almost every day. They will complete surveys about their symptoms. Participants will be discharged after they have 2 consecutive negative tests for flu. Participants will have at least 4 follow-up visits: 1 visit every 2 weeks for 8 weeks.
This is a Phase 2, randomized, multi-center study in approximately 300 adults who received 2 doses of aH5N1c or placebo in and completed the parent study V89_18 in the \<65 years of age cohort. The study investigates whether two priming doses of MF59-adjuvanted H5N1 cell culture-derived vaccine (aH5N1c) followed by one or two booster vaccinations with a MF59-adjuvanted H5N6 cell culture derived vaccine (aH5N6c) 3 weeks apart elicit immune responses to the antigens used for priming (H5N1) and boosting (H5N6) after first and second heterologous booster vaccination. Eligible subjects, who received 2 doses of aH5N1c in the parent study V89_18 are randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either two aH5N6c vaccinations, 3 weeks apart (group 1) or an aH5N6c vaccination on Day 1 and saline placebo on Day 22 (group 2). Eligible subjects, who received placebo in the parent study will receive two aH5N6c vaccinations, 3 weeks apart (group 3). After the second vaccine administration, subjects are monitored for approximately 6 months for safety and antibody persistence. The total study duration will be approximately 7 months per subject.
This study examines how the immune system responds to the flu virus (H3N2) during and after infection and how the flu virus is transmitted in the environment. The study will used a flu virus called the H3N2 influenza challenge virus which was produced specifically for use in clinical research in controlled conditions. The study will also assess the safety of the H3N2 influenza challenge in healthy subjects. Mild to moderate symptoms are expected based on previous studies with this strain of influenza.
The purpose of this clinical trial is to learn about the safety and effects of the study vaccine for the potential prevention of influenza. The study vaccine is called Self-Amplifying Ribonucleic Acid vaccine (saRNA vaccine). This study is seeking participants who: * Are between the age of 18 to 49 years old. * Are willing and able to comply with all scheduled visits, treatment plan, laboratory tests, lifestyle considerations, and other study procedures. * Are healthy as determined by medical history, physical examinations, and the study doctor. * For male participants, can father children and willing to use an acceptable method of contraception. Female participants who are not of childbearing potential; or male participant not able to father children. * Are capable of giving signed informed consent. Participants will receive either the saRNA vaccine, a licensed Influenza Vaccine (QIV) or a placebo. Participants will not know which vaccine they receive in advance. A placebo does not have any medicine in it but looks just like the study medicine. Participants will receive the study vaccines as a single shot in the arm. We will compare participant experiences to help us determine if the saRNA vaccine is safe and effective. Participants will take part in this study for 6 months. During this time, they will receive the study vaccine and participate in follow-up visits.
Lung allograft recipients have a higher burden of influenza disease and greater associated morbidity and mortality compared with healthy controls. Induction and early maintenance immunosuppression is thought to impair immunogenicity to standard dose inactivated influenza vaccine. This early post-transplant period is when immunity is most desirable, since influenza disease during this time frame is associated with adverse consequences. Thus, strategies to reduce severe influenza disease in this highly susceptible population are critical. No trials in lung transplant recipients have evaluated two doses of HD-IIV within the same influenza season as a strategy to improve immunogenicity and durability of influenza prevention. Furthermore, no influenza vaccine trials have focused on enrollment of subjects at early post-transplant timepoints. Very few studies have been performed in solely lung allograft recipients. Immunosuppression intensity is highest in lung patients, thereby limiting comparisons to recipients of heart, liver, and kidney transplants. Therefore, studies to assess both HD-IIV and two-dose strategies in the same influenza season in post-lung transplant recipients are greatly needed. The central hypothesis of our proposal is that lung allograft recipients who are 1-35 months post-transplant and receiving two doses of HD-quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (QIV) will have higher HAI geometric mean titers (GMT) to influenza antigens compared to those receiving two doses of SD-QIV. To test this hypothesis and address the above critical knowledge gaps, we propose to conduct a phase II, multi-center, randomized, double-blind, controlled immunogenicity and safety trial comparing the administration of two doses of HD-QIV to two doses of SD-QIV in lung allograft recipients 1-35 months post-transplant. The results of this clinical trial will address significant knowledge gaps regarding influenza vaccine strategies (e.g., one vs. two doses and HD-QIV vs. SD-QIV) and immune responses in lung transplant recipients and will guide vaccine recommendations during the post-transplant period.
The main purpose of this study is to understand: * the symptoms of COVID-19 or influenza- health-related outcomes of people with COVID-19 or influenza (influenza only included in updated study analyses) * the potential effects of COVID-19 vaccines in people with COVID-19 This study will enroll participants who are: * 18 years or older * reported to have symptoms with tests that have confirmed illness. The tests can be taken at any of CVS pharmacy COVID-19 or influenza test sites. The study will collect vaccine history information from participants who are ready to take part in the study. Participant will be emailed a form with questions about their health related to COVID-19 or influenza during multiple follow-ups over a 6-month period.
Cellular and humoral immune responses before and after seasonal influenza vaccination will be assessed. Each year, up to 100 participants will be enrolled. To study age-specific differences in immune responses, participants with various years of birth will be enrolled. The investigators hypothesize that humans with different birth years will mount antibody and cellular responses of different specificities following seasonal influenza vaccination.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of Ad26.RSV.preF-based vaccine and quadrivalent high-dose seasonal influenza vaccine when administered either concomitantly or separately.
This study will be divided into two substudies - Substudy A (SSA) and Substudy B (SSB) Substudy A This is a Phase 1 randomized substudy to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of monovalent influenza modRNA vaccine (mIRV) and bivalent influenza modRNA vaccine (bIRV) at various dose levels, and quadrivalent influenza modRNA vaccine (qIRV), in participants 65 to 85 years of age. Participants will receive at Vaccination 1 either: * 1 of 4 dose levels of mIRV (either A or B Strain), * 1 of 4 dose levels of bIRV (containing both A and B strains), * qIRV (at 1 dose level), or * A licensed quadrivalent influenza vaccine (QIV). At approximately 8 weeks following Vaccination 1, participants will be unblinded and QIV (Vaccination 2) administered to participants not having previously received this at Vaccination 1. Additionally, participants who previously received QIV at Vaccination 1 will receive one of the following for Vaccination 2: * mIRV encoding A strain at dose level 4, or * mIRV encoding B strain at dose level 4. Substudy B This is a randomized substudy to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of the following vaccination schedules in participants 65 to 85 years of age: 2-Visit Schedules * 2 doses of qIRV (at a dose level 1), administered 21 days apart. * 2 doses of licensed QIV, administered 21 days apart (as a control group) * A dose of licensed QIV following by a dose of bIRV encoding 2 A strains at dose level combination 1 or 2, administered 21 days apart. 1-Visit Schedules * A dose of licensed QIV administered concurrently in the opposite arm with bIRV encoding 2 A strains at dose level combination 1 or 2. * A dose of bIRV encoding 2 A strains administered concurrently in the opposite arm with a dose of bIRV encoding 2 B strains.at dose level 1. * A dose of qIRV encoding 2 A strains and 2 B strains at dose level 2 (at one of two possible dose level combinations). * A dose of qIRV encoding 2 A strains and 2 B strains at dose level 3. * 1 dose of licensed QIV (as a control group). Substudy B In participants 18 to 64 years of age: -A dose of qIRV encoding 2 A strains and 2 B strains at a dose level combination 1 or 2.
This Phase 3 study is a randomized, observer-blind immunogenicity and safety study of aQIV (an MF59-adjuvanted quadrivalent influenza vaccine) compared with a licensed quadrivalent influenza vaccine in adults 50 to 64 years of age.
Influenza outbreaks are a prevalent event in nursing homes (NHs). We will study baloxavir compared to oseltamivir when used for influenza prophylaxis when facilities identify an index incident case of influenza. This study will help guide nursing home's decision making and demonstrate the effectiveness of a novel antiviral for preventing influenza outbreaks.
Background: Influenza (flu) is a contagious respiratory illness. It is caused by influenza viruses that infect the nose, throat, and sometimes the lungs. Vaccines are given to teach the body to prevent or fight infection. Researchers want to study a new vaccine to prevent the seasonal flu. Objective: To see if the FluMos-v1 vaccine is safe and how the body responds to it. Eligibility: Healthy adults ages 18-50 years inclusive were enrolled. Design: Participants were screened through a separate protocol. Participants were tested for COVID-19. They may have had a pregnancy test. Participants received the investigational FluMos-v1 vaccine or the licensed inactivated seasonal quadrivalent influenza vaccine Flucelvax injected in the upper arm. Participants completed a diary card for 7 days. They recorded any symptoms they had. They were given a thermometer to check their temperature. They were also given a ruler to measure any skin changes at the injection site. Participants had about 10 study visits. They were asked how they were feeling and if they had taken any medications. They had blood drawn. Some participants had an optional apheresis. Blood was removed through a needle in a vein in one arm. A machine separated the white blood cells. The rest of the blood was returned through a needle in a vein in the other arm. Participation lasted for 40 weeks.
Study to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of H7N9 antigen in combination with full or half doses of AS03 adjuvant system in healthy adults.
This Phase 2, randomized, observer-blind, active controlled clinical study is evaluating the safety and immunogenicity of the investigational MF59-Adjuvanted Quadrivalent Subunit Inactivated Influenza Vaccine. Approximately 480 subjects are to be randomized into 1 of 4 possible treatment groups (investigational Influenza Vaccine or licensed Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine comparators) at 120 participants per group. Every participant will receive an influenza vaccine injection on Day 1 and will be followed up for approximately 6 months following injection. The primary immunogenicity analysis is based on Day 29 serum.