22 Clinical Trials for Various Conditions
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if using an incentive spirometer can reduce lung problems in people with advanced lung cancer who are receiving chemotherapy and radiation therapy. The main questions the study aims to answer are: Does using an incentive spirometer lower the chances of developing lung inflammation (pneumonitis)? Does it improve overall survival and quality of life? Participants will: Use an incentive spirometer, a device that helps with deep breathing, 10 times every hour while awake. Continue using the spirometer daily during treatment and for up to three months after treatment. Complete quality of life assessments at the start of the study and at 3, 6, and 12 months. Researchers will compare the results to see if the incentive spirometer helps reduce lung problems and improves participants\' well-being during and after their cancer treatment.
This single-arm proof-of-concept research study aims to assess the effect of a digital incentive spirometer (IS) device and a companion mobile-based app on incentive spirometry adherence in patients post-surgery. The digital IS utilizes a sensor to measure inspiratory breaths, and these data are transmitted wirelessly to a secure cloud database. The spirometer and app include a patient reminder system, exercise gamification strategies, progress tracking, and additional features designed to promote patient IS use.
The purpose of this study is to determine if the frequency of use of incentive spirometry during the stay in the Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) increases with visual and auditory electronic reminders, as compared to not having those reminders.
This study is designed to determine if patients using an incentive spirometer with visual and auditory signals will increase their use of the incentive spirometer and prevent lung complications.
Gamification may be one solution that can increase the compliance in the use of devices like incentive spirometry.
The goal of this study is to determine the efficacy of incentive spirometry (IS) to improve pulmonary function in the preoperative and postoperative surgical setting. The investigators hypothesize that IS will improve pulmonary function for patients undergoing major abdominal surgery when controlling for protocol compliance. Additionally, the investigators hypothesize that a digital IS device enabled with a text message-based mobile health intervention will improve pulmonary pre-habilitation and rehabilitation, as well as postoperative compliance with the IS device.
The primary aim of this randomized control trial is to analyze by direct comparison the ZEPHYRx Respiratory Therapy (RT) system and the FDA approved standard of care (SOC) incentive spirometer (IS), used for FDA approved indications at the University of Rochester Medical Center (URMC). This comparison will determine subject preferences in terms of usability and simplicity of each, as well as subject engagement and adherence to the prescribed respiratory therapy routine. Additionally, the study will analyze the effectiveness of the gamified spirometry with regards to spirometry volumes, frequency of usage, and pulmonary complications 30 days post discharge.
Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) are the most common complication following thoracic surgery. PPCs are associated with prolonged hospital stay, increased morbidity, mortality, ICU admission, and healthcare costs (Azhar, 2015). Current preoperative optimization in this patient group includes smoking cessation and management of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease with inhaled bronchodilators and inhaled steroids as indicated. There have been studies using preoperative incentive spirometry in patients undergoing laparotomy with conflicting results, but scant data on its use in patients undergoing one-lung ventilation (Tyson, et al., 2015; Cattano, et al., 2010). A study from 2013 investigated the effectiveness of incentive spirometry in patients following thoracotomy and found conflicting results, without significant improvement in lung function or reduction in PPCs, but a larger difference in frequency of PPC was noted, indicating possible benefit to intervention and a need for further study (Agostini, et al., 2013). Volume-based incentive spirometry pre- and postoperatively has also been found to improve pulmonary function and diaphragm excursion in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery (Alaparthi, et al., 2016). Patients customarily receive an incentive spirometer for use postoperatively in the PACU. There is scant data in the thoracic surgery population concerning prehabilitation by dispensing the incentive spirometer at the PACT evaluation.
The purpose of the protocol is to assess how incentive spirometer data gathered via a smartphone platform can be utilized to improve participant adherence to prescribed incentive spirometer exercises in the post-operative period. Half of the participants will receive a standard of care incentive spirometer with a passive tracking device while the other half of the participants will receive a smartphone connected device and smartphone with an application that will encourage their use.
Postoperative (PO) hypoventilation, atelectasis and hypoxemia after bariatric surgery are common and multifactorial, contributing to prolonged oxygen (O2) therapy after surgery and even at hospital discharge. Incentive spirometry (IS) is recommended postoperatively but its success in preventing postoperative atelectasis and hypoxemia (POH) heavily depends on patient compliance with IS effort and frequency. The investigators hypothesize that a focused education preoperatively on IS for POH and intensive monitoring of patient compliance with IS therapy in the early postoperative period shortens postoperative oxygen therapy, decreases POH episodes, and improves respiratory outcomes after bariatric surgery, compared to patients receiving standard of care.
Post-operative pulmonary complications (PPCs) have a major impact on patients and healthcare expenses. The goal of perioperative respiratory therapy is to improve airway clearance, increase lung volume, and mitigate atelectasis. Incentive spirometers (IS) are ubiquitously used to prevent atelectasis and PPCs-implementation of which requires substantial provider time and healthcare expenses. However, meta-analyses have demonstrated that the effectiveness of ISs is unclear due to poor patient compliance in past studies. The goal of this investigation is evaluate the effectiveness of IS on post-operative clinical outcomes. The aims of this investigation are to evaluate 1) if IS use compliance can be improved by adding a use-recording patient reminder alarm, and 2) the clinical outcomes of the more compliant IS users vs. the less-compliant IS users.
To evaluate the use of Incentive Spirometry in Non-critically Ill Hospitalized Patients With Shortness of Breath.
This study evaluates the omission of incentive spirometry use following bariatric surgery. Half of participants will receive an incentive spirometer while the other half will not. Oxygen saturation and pulmonary complications after surgery will be measured to examine the effectiveness of incentive spirometry.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the use of preoperative incentive spirometry (IS) as an aid to improve postoperative lung function. The hypothesis is that application of a standardized protocol of preoperative respiratory care teaching and exercise will improve lung performance that will subsequently result in prevention of postoperative pulmonary complications and that increasing the duration of preoperative use better improves lung mechanics postoperatively. The investigators propose to compare a patient population that uses IS as currently prescribed in the routine course of care (only to be familiar with preoperatively, but use postoperatively) against a population that uses IS with a standardized regimen for at least 3 days prior to the operation in terms of preoperative IS volumes, intraoperative pulmonary mechanics, postoperative IS volumes, and incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications.
Background: Lung problems develop in up to 20% of people after they have surgery. While under general anesthesia, people breathe slower and draw in less air. They may have difficulty returning to normal deep breathing as they recover. Some may develop life-threatening complications. An approved device called an incentive spirometer is used to help measure and improve a person s breathing after surgery. Researchers want to find out if a motion sensor placed on the chest can also measure the volume of air a person inhales as they breathe. Objective: To determine if a motion sensor on the chest can measure the volume of air a person breathes. Eligibility: Healthy adults aged 18 years and older. Design: Participants will have 1 clinic visit. The visit will last 10 to 30 minutes. They will fill out a form with their age, sex, height, and weight. A small, plastic motion sensor will be taped to their chest on 1 or both sides. Participants will breathe through a tube attached to an incentive spirometer. They will take 18 breaths of different volumes, both deep and shallow. Researchers will use the data collected from the motion sensors to measure how the chest moves at different levels of breathing. The motion sensor data will be used to create a software program that converts chest wall motion to the volume of air inhaled for a given breath in real time.
The objective of this study is to demonstrate that inspiratory muscle training with daily use of an incentive spirometer for at least 14 days prior to lung surgery will reduce the risk of post-operative pulmonary complications.
Acute traumatic rib fractures are a common issue for patients of trauma surgeons. They inflict substantial morbidity, the most dreaded and consequential of which are pulmonary complications. While these fractures are often treated non-operatively, there is a continued need for effective adjuvant treatments to improve rib fracture pain and outcomes. Prior studies have evaluated outcome measures for traumatic rib fractures that include respiratory failure, tracheostomy requirement, ICU length of stay, hospital length of stay, narcotic requirement, daily maximum incentive spirometry volume, pneumonia, and mortality . Rib belts, which have been present since at least 1945, have long been used to provide pain relief via chest wall stabilization \[3\]. However there is an extreme paucity of literature regarding their clinical efficacy, and their use has largely been abandoned due to concerns that they may have been overly constricting and resulted in poorer respiratory (pulmonary/breathing) outcomes. Newer generation rib belts are more elastic and theoretically less constricting than their earlier generation predecessors, however their clinical efficacy has not been yet demonstrated. The investigators will therefore plan to perform a prospective trial to determine if these rib strapping devices are effective clinical tools in the traumatic rib fracture population. The goal of the study is institutional quality improvement, to determine if the investigators see benefit of these devices for the pain management of our trauma population. The investigators will also conduct this as a pilot trial for hopeful future research applications, however the overall goal is institutional improvement. Patients determined to be eligible for the study by the admitting physician (and per the previously defined criteria) will be recruited to enroll in the project within the first 24 hours of their hospital admission. Recruited patients will be offered the opportunity to consent to enrollment in the study and will be assigned by the study team into either the intervention (RibFx belt +current standard of care) or control (current standard of care) arm in a quasi-experimental prospective design: untreated control group with dependent pretest and posttest samples. In this manner, the intervention arm will be both compared to themselves (pretest vs. posttests) as well as to a control group not exposed to the intervention. The relevant study materials will be included in their paper (physical) and electronic chart. Patients upon enrollment in the study will undergo an initial assessment that will include their baseline pain scores, narcotic consumption, incentive spirometry scores, and the subjective self-reported results of their questionnaire (the pre-test questionnaire- see attached). Patients will continue to be scored on objective (incentive spirometry results, opioid pain medicine consumption) and subjective variables (pain scores) during their hospital course. Between 24-48 hours after enrollment, they will be prompted to again complete a similar 2nd questionnaire post-test (if they are discharged from the hospital at this point in the time course, they will be sent home with the questionnaire and prompted to complete it at home). At their follow up appointment in trauma clinic (which will be coordinated by the research team to be as close as possible to 3 weeks post injury), they will have the opportunity to again voluntarily complete a final short questionnaires (post-test) that assess their pain control and respiratory function over the last 3 weeks. At this point, their involvement in the trial will be complete. Patients themselves will play an active role in data collection during the trial, and will be instructed and prompted in how to do so. Patients will be expected to fill out a worksheet on a daily basis, both while inpatient and after discharge, on their daily incentive spirometry scores as well as their minimum and maximum pain scale scores. This will be used to supplement the survey or questionnaire data, as well as the objective data from the electronic medical record. The investigators will ultimately compare groups using a quasi-experimental design as follows: Untreated control group with dependent pretest and posttest samples. This will allow for a direct comparison of patient to patient within the intervention arm (patient pretest result serving as control compared to posttest result) . To observe for temporal variability, their will be a control group with no intervention as well (no rib belt worn) , however the principle aim of the study is the comparison of patients to themselves in a pre-test, post-test fashion.
This pilot study will evaluate how well version 2 of the ICOUGH app, a bed-side mobile app increases patients' adherence to a postoperative protocol called ICOUGH. Specific outcomes, such as length of hospital stay, postoperative lung complications, unplanned intubations, and death will be assessed in participants who do and those who do not use the ICOUGH Recovery app, positing that a smartphone intervention should improve these outcomes over time. ICOUGH is a mnemonic that stands for each step of a protocol shown to decrease lung-related complications of surgery. It stands for Incentive spirometry (a breathing device that expands the lungs), Coughing and deep breathing, Oral hygiene, Understanding (patient and family education), Getting out of bed at least three times daily, and Head-of-bed elevation. The ICOUGH protocol was developed at Boston Medical Center (BMC) and has been shown to improve patient outcomes by decreasing postoperative pneumonia by 38%, unplanned intubations by 40%, and all adverse outcomes by 40%, which has resulted in over $5 million in cost savings for BMC in a two-year period. There is an instructional paper pamphlet with intuitive pictures for each step of ICOUGH, and patient subjects can log how many times they've done each step.
The Effectiveness of the Jamboxx Respiratory Therapy Device in Treatment of Patients with Decreased Respiratory Function is a proposal for investigation of the application of gaming to improving respiratory health. The Jamboxx device (see appendix A for device details) combines gaming with traditional incentive spirometry to provide users with a fun experience to keep them engaged in their respiratory therapy routine. The device allows users to play a series of mini-games that walk them through their routines. The Jamboxx also records airflow and lung parameters with an external mouthpiece attachment to provide users with real time feedback, and helps to assess increases or decreases in relative lung function over time. The Jamboxx has the potential to significantly impact the field of respiratory therapy by being one of the first gaming devices for patient therapy, and the first respiratory therapy gaming device that is accessible to users with limited mobility. Jamboxx provides a fun and engaging, low cost alternative to the traditional therapy techniques used and aims to improve patient compliance. This study addresses postoperative pulmonary atelectasis that results from diaphragm dysfunction and pain following upper abdominal surgery. This issue is a major cause of morbidity in these patients (Ford et al 1983). Incentive spirometry is used in this setting, but there is conflicting data regarding its effectiveness (Rupp et al 2013). Study 3 will focus on the questions regarding the influence of education and a novel use of a gaming device on prevention of atelectasis. Study 3 will include 3 subgroups of subjects. The first subject group will be enrolled in a nonintrusive observation only studies. Group 1 will explore the effect of technology via a tablet device on standard spirometry usage. Group 2 will look at the combined effect of technology via the tablet device and intensive education on compliance and reduction of post-surgical atelectasis. Finally, Group 3 will explore the effect of gaming technology with intensive educational reinforcement on compliance and reduction of post-surgical atelectasis.
The Effectiveness of the Jamboxx Respiratory Therapy Device in Treatment of Patients with Decreased Respiratory Function is a proposal for investigation of the application of gaming to improving respiratory health. The Jamboxx device combines gaming with traditional incentive spirometry to provide users with a fun experience to keep them engaged in their respiratory therapy routine. The device allows users to play a series of mini-games that walk them through their routines. The Jamboxx also records airflow and lung parameters with an external mouthpiece attachment to provide users with real time feedback, and helps to assess increases or decreases in relative lung function over time. The Jamboxx has the potential to significantly impact the field of respiratory therapy by being one of the first gaming devices for patient therapy, and the first respiratory therapy gaming device that is accessible to users with limited mobility. Jamboxx provides a fun and engaging, low cost alternative to the traditional therapy techniques used and aims to improve patient compliance.
The primary purpose of this study is to determine if there is a significant difference in regional distribution of ventilation when comparing eupneic tidal ventilation with Incentive Spirometry (I.S.) and EzPAP® lung expansion therapy in healthy adult human subjects. Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) will be used to measure regional distribution of ventilation during resting tidal ventilation and during lung expansion therapy.
The purpose of this study is to better understand how air is spread throughout study participants' lungs after abdominal surgery by comparing two lung inflation treatments: 1. Incentive Spirometry (I.S.) lung expansion therapy 2. EzPAP® lung expansion therapy. Lung expansion therapy is routinely used after upper abdominal surgery. Taking deep breaths after surgery helps lungs to stay inflated. At the University of Virginia, it is at the physician's discretion as to which treatment will be used to help with deep breathing lung inflation therapy after surgery. The investigators would like to know which of the lung inflation therapies is better at helping inflate participants' lungs. The investigators will be using a device called Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) to measure how effectively air spreads in participants' lungs. This device is not currently approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the purpose used in this study, and therefore, it is considered investigational. Investigators are inviting eligible participants to consider participating in this study because doctors order Incentive Spirometry as a standard of care following upper abdominal surgery. Information gained from monitoring how air is spread throughout participants' lungs will help investigators to determine if there is a clinical difference and benefit when comparing Incentive Spirometry and EzPAP lung expansion therapies.