1,041 Clinical Trials for Various Conditions
The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety, reactogenicity and immunogenicity of the Flu Pandemic messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccine (including dose-finding and dose-confirmation) administered in healthy adults 18 to 85 years of age.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the immunogenicity, safety, and reactogenicity of mRNA-1083 as compared with active control, co-administered licensed influenza and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS CoV 2) vaccines, in 2 independent age-group sub-study cohorts, healthy adults 65 years and older (Cohort A) and healthy adults 50 to \<65 years of age (Cohort B).
The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and immunogenicity of different formulations of monovalent Influenza A/Astrakhan/3212/2020-like virus vaccine with AS03 adjuvant system in adults greater than or equal to (\>=)18 years of age.
The purpose of this Phase 1/2 study is to generate sufficient safety and immunogenicity data of mRNA-1018 pandemic influenza candidate vaccines in healthy adults ≥18 years of age to enable the initiation of a large Phase 3 trial with one selected vaccine candidate. The study will be conducted in 2 Parts (Part A and Part B) that will enroll and run concurrently. Part A of the study will evaluate 4 vaccine candidates (H5N8, H7N9, H5 only, and H7 only). Part B of the study will evaluate a single vaccine candidate (H5 only-CG).
Background: Influenza (flu) virus causes 3 to 5 million cases of severe illness and up to 650,000 deaths per year worldwide. Current vaccines work well against single strains of flu virus. But no single vaccine works well against all flu viruses that can cause illness. Objective: To test an experimental flu vaccine (FluMos-v2) in healthy adults. Eligibility: Healthy adults aged 18 to 50 years. Design: Participants will have 11 clinic visits in 10 months. They must agree not to get a licensed flu vaccine while taking part in this study. FluMos-v2 will be given with a needle injected into a muscle in the upper arm. Participants will receive a follow-up phone call the following day. Participants will be given a diary card, a ruler, and a thermometer. They will take their temperature every day for 7 days after receiving the shot. They will measure any skin changes at the injection site. They will record their findings and how they feel. Participants will receive a second FluMos-v2 shot after 4 months. They will repeat the other follow-up steps. Participants will have 9 other clinic follow-up visits. Blood will be drawn at each visit. Participants should also come to the clinic if they develop flu-like symptoms during the study. Participants may opt for an apheresis 2 weeks after each shot: Blood will be removed through a needle in the vein of 1 arm. The blood will run through a machine that separates out the white blood cells. The remaining blood is returned through a needle in the other arm.
This Phase 1, randomized, observer-blind, dose-ranging clinical study is evaluating 6 different formulations of MF59-adjuvanted and non-adjuvanted H2N3 influenza vaccine. Approximately 600 healthy adult subjects are to be randomized into 1 of 6 possible treatment groups with 100 subjects per group, stratified by age group (born after or before 1968). Each subject will receive an influenza vaccine injection on Day 1 and Day 22. Subjects will be followed up for approximately 12 months after the second vaccine injection. The primary immunogenicity analysis is based on the Day 1, Day 8, Day 22, Day 29, and Day 43 serology data. The primary safety analysis is based on solicited local and systemic adverse events (AEs) reported within 10 days after each vaccination, unsolicited AEs reported within 3 weeks after each vaccination, and serious AEs (SAEs), medically attended AEs (MAAEs), AEs leading to withdrawal from the study, and AEs of special interest (AESIs) reported throughout the study.
This Phase 2, randomized, observer-blind clinical study is evaluating 3 different priming and booster regimens with MF59-adjuvanted H5N8 and/or H5N6 cell culture-derived influenza vaccine (aH5N8c; aH5N6c). Approximately 480 healthy adult subjects are to be randomized into 1 of 3 possible treatment groups, stratified by age group (18-64 years and ≥65 years) and by poultry worker status (yes/no). Each subject will receive a priming influenza vaccine injection on Day 1 and Day 22 and a booster vaccination on Day 202. Subjects will be followed up for approximately 6 months after the booster injection. The primary immunogenicity analysis is based on antibody responses against H5N8 and H5N6 as measured by hemagglutination inhibition (HI) assay on Day 1, Day 22, Day 29, Day 43, Day 202, Day 209 (H5N8 only), and Day 223.
This study includes 3 parts: Parts A, B, and C. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of mRNA-1010 seasonal influenza vaccine in adults.
The study is divided into 2 parts: Part 1 and Part 2. The purpose of Part 1 of this study is to generate sufficient safety, reactogenicity, and immunogenicity data to enable selection of an mRNA-1083 vaccine composition and dose level to evaluate in a subsequent Phase 3 clinical trial in adults. The purpose of Part 2 of this study is to generate safety and immunogenicity data for additional mRNA-1083 compositions and dose levels in young adults ≥18 years and \<50 years of age.
The primary goal of this study is to evaluate the safety and reactogenicity of multi-component vaccines mRNA-1045 (Influenza and RSV) and mRNA-1230 (influenza, RSV, and SARS-CoV-2) compared with mRNA-1010 (influenza), mRNA-1345 (RSV), and mRNA-1273.214 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines in healthy older participants.
The purpose of this study is to assess the immunogenicity, safety and reactogenicity of the RSVPreF3 OA investigational vaccine when co-administered with the high dose quadrivalent influenza (FLU HD) vaccine in adults aged 65 years and above compared to separate administration of the vaccines.
This is a Phase 2, randomized, multi-center study in approximately 300 adults who received 2 doses of aH5N1c or placebo in and completed the parent study V89_18 in the \<65 years of age cohort. The study investigates whether two priming doses of MF59-adjuvanted H5N1 cell culture-derived vaccine (aH5N1c) followed by one or two booster vaccinations with a MF59-adjuvanted H5N6 cell culture derived vaccine (aH5N6c) 3 weeks apart elicit immune responses to the antigens used for priming (H5N1) and boosting (H5N6) after first and second heterologous booster vaccination. Eligible subjects, who received 2 doses of aH5N1c in the parent study V89_18 are randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either two aH5N6c vaccinations, 3 weeks apart (group 1) or an aH5N6c vaccination on Day 1 and saline placebo on Day 22 (group 2). Eligible subjects, who received placebo in the parent study will receive two aH5N6c vaccinations, 3 weeks apart (group 3). After the second vaccine administration, subjects are monitored for approximately 6 months for safety and antibody persistence. The total study duration will be approximately 7 months per subject.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of Ad26.RSV.preF-based vaccine and quadrivalent high-dose seasonal influenza vaccine when administered either concomitantly or separately.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical lot-to-lot consistency of the respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) maternal (RSV MAT) vaccine administered to healthy non-pregnant women 18-49 years of age (YOA). In addition, this study will evaluate immunogenicity, safety and reactogenicity from co-administration of RSV MAT vaccine and GSK's quadrivalent seasonal influenza (Flu D-QIV) vaccine.
Background: Influenza (flu) is a virus that infects people of all ages. Some people may have mild flu symptoms. Others may get very sick and even die from the flu. Flu vaccines help protect people against the flu, but if the flu strains in the vaccine are not a good match with the strains circulating in the community, the vaccine is not as effective. Researchers want to make flu vaccines that protect against changing flu strains. Objective: To test if a new flu vaccine is safe and if it creates an immune response. Eligibility: Healthy adults ages 18-55 who do not smoke and have not received a flu vaccine in the 8 weeks prior or a COVID-19 vaccine in the 4 weeks prior to enrollment. Design: Participants will be screened on a separate protocol. Participants will have 9 visits over 7 months. They will get a combination of study vaccine and/or placebo, both as a shot in the arm and as a spray into the nose, at 2 visits. For 7 days after getting the vaccines, they will take their temperature and complete online surveys at home to record any symptoms. At each visit, participants will have a physical exam and medical history. They will give blood and urine samples. They will have nasal testing. For this, a thin absorptive strip will be inserted into their nostril for 1 minute to collect mucus. At some visits, the inside of their nose will be wiped with a small brush to collect cells. For this, their nostril will be numbed to make it more comfortable. Some blood and nasal samples will be used for genetic testing. Participants who get flu-like symptoms during the study will be asked to collect nasal samples at home and send these samples back to NIH to test if they actually have the flu.
Background: Influenza (flu) is a contagious respiratory illness. It is caused by influenza viruses that infect the nose, throat, and sometimes the lungs. Vaccines are given to teach the body to prevent or fight infection. Researchers want to study a new vaccine to prevent the seasonal flu. Objective: To see if the FluMos-v1 vaccine is safe and how the body responds to it. Eligibility: Healthy adults ages 18-50 years inclusive were enrolled. Design: Participants were screened through a separate protocol. Participants were tested for COVID-19. They may have had a pregnancy test. Participants received the investigational FluMos-v1 vaccine or the licensed inactivated seasonal quadrivalent influenza vaccine Flucelvax injected in the upper arm. Participants completed a diary card for 7 days. They recorded any symptoms they had. They were given a thermometer to check their temperature. They were also given a ruler to measure any skin changes at the injection site. Participants had about 10 study visits. They were asked how they were feeling and if they had taken any medications. They had blood drawn. Some participants had an optional apheresis. Blood was removed through a needle in a vein in one arm. A machine separated the white blood cells. The rest of the blood was returned through a needle in a vein in the other arm. Participation lasted for 40 weeks.
This randomized, partially-blinded, active comparator-controlled was conducted at multiple sites globally. The composition of QVLP used in this study includes a mix of recombinant H1, H3, and two B hemagglutinin proteins expressed as VLPs and is based on the 2020-2021 influenza virus strains. In this study, 3 dose levels (15 μg/strain, 30 μg/strain, and 45 μg/strain) of QVLP were planned to be tested in combination with 2 dose levels of AS03 adjuvant (full and half dose) in a single-dose regimen to select a dose level of QVLP and adjuvant dose level-combination that is safe and effective for further development. Participants participated in this study for up to approximately 13 months, during which the first visit was scheduled for screening (up to 7 days in advance of vaccine administration) and the second visit on Day 0 was scheduled for vaccine administration. Telephone contacts were made on Day 1, Day 8, and monthly (starting after Day 28) until the end of the study for safety assessments, including concomitant medication use review. Blood draws at the clinic site for key safety assessments were made on Day 3, and Day 28 and for key immunogenicity assessments on Day 0, Day 28, Day 182 (6-month follow-up), and Day 365 (12-month follow-up).
Background: The flu is a common viral infection that can be deadly for certain people. Vaccines against flu have been developed to teach the body to prevent or fight the infection. A new vaccine may help the body to make an immune response to H10 flu, a flu strain that infects humans. Objective: To test the safety and effectiveness of the H10 Stabilized Stem Ferritin vaccine (VRC-FLUNPF0103-00-VP or H10ssF-6473). Eligibility: Healthy adults ages 18-70, but not born between 1965-1970 Design: Participants received 1 or 2 vaccinations by injections (shots) in the upper arm muscle over 4 months. Participants received a thermometer and recorded their temperature and symptoms every day on/with/via a diary card for 7 days after each injection. The injection site was checked for redness, swelling, itching or bruising. Participants had 8-10 follow-up visits over 10 months. At follow-up visits, participants had blood drawn and were checked for health changes or problems. Participants who reported influenza-like illness had nose and throat swabs collected for evaluation of viral infection. Some participants had apheresis. A needle was placed into a vein in both arms. Blood was removed through a needle in the vein of one arm. A machine removed the white blood cells and then the rest of the blood was returned to the participant through a needle in the other arm.
Background: The flu is a common viral infection that can be deadly for certain people. Vaccines against flu have been developed to teach the body to prevent or fight the infection. A new vaccine may help the body to make an immune response to H1 flu, a flu strain that infects humans. Objective: To test the safety and effectiveness of the H1 Stabilized Stem Ferritin vaccine (VRC-FLUNPF099-00-VP). Eligibility: Healthy people ages 18-70 years old who got at least 1 licensed flu vaccine since January 1, 2014. Design: Participants received 1 or 2 vaccinations by injections (shots) in the upper arm muscle over 4 months. Participants received a thermometer and recorded their temperature and symptoms every day a diary card for 7 days after each injection. The injection site was checked for redness, swelling, or bruising. Participants had 9-11 follow-up visits over 12-15 months. At follow-up visits, participants had blood drawn and were checked for health changes or problems. Participants who reported influenza-like illness had nose and throat swabs for evaluation of viral infection. Some participants had apheresis. A needle was placed into a vein in both arms. Blood was removed through a needle in the vein of one arm. A machine removed the white blood cells and then the rest of the blood was returned to the participant through a needle in the other arm. A separate consent was provided to participants for genetic testing on their samples.
Immunization with the inactivated influenza vaccine with blood samples collected at 7 visits (baseline, day 7, 14, 28, 60, 90 and 180, fine needle aspiration (FNAs) from axillary lymph nodes at baseline, days, 4, 14, 28, 60 and 180. BMA at baseline, days 28 and 180.
The purpose of this study is to assess priming with antigenically mismatched live attenuated A/H7N3 influenza virus vaccine followed by inactivated A/H7N9 influenza virus vaccine in healthy adults.
The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the non-inferiority of the concomitant administration of an adenovirus serotype 26- based vaccine encoding for the respiratory syncytial virus pre-fusion F protein (Ad26.RSV.preF) and seasonal influenza vaccine versus the administration of seasonal influenza vaccine alone in terms of humoral immune response expressed by the geometric mean titers (GMTs) of hemagglutination inhibition (HI) antibody titers against all four influenza vaccine strains 28 days after the administration of influenza vaccine, and to assess the safety and tolerability of a single dose of 1\*10\^11 viral particles (vp) of Ad26.RSV.preF, administered intramuscularly to participants aged greater than or equal to 60 years separately or concomitantly with seasonal influenza vaccine.
This Phase 3 study is intended to assess the efficacy of the Quadrivalent VLP Influenza Vaccine during the 2017-2018 influenza season in healthy adults 18 to 64 years of age. One dose of Quadrivalent VLP Influenza Vaccine (30 μg/strain) or of placebo will be administered to approximately 10,000 participants
Background: Influenza, or "flu", is a very common infectious respiratory disease. Researchers want to develop a vaccine against flu. Vaccines teach the body to fight or prevent an infection. When the body learns to fight an infection, this is called an immune response. In this study, researchers want to test two new vaccines to help the body make an immune response to flu. Subjects received the vaccine injections in the upper arm muscle. One vaccine, the influenza HA Ferritin vaccine (HA-F A/Sing), was given to all subjects with a needle injection. The other vaccine, influenza DNA vaccine (DNA A/Sing), was given to subjects in Group 3 by a needle-free device that uses high pressure to push the vaccine through the skin and into the muscle. Objective: To test the safety and side effects of two new vaccines for prevention of H2 influenza (flu). Eligibility: Part I: Healthy adults ages 18-47 born after 1969. Part II: Healthy adults ages 18-70, but not born in 1966-1969. Design: Volunteers were tested for eligibility in a separate screening protocol. In Part I, all subjects received injections of HA Ferritin vaccine. These subjects were not expected to have H2N2 exposure based on their age and when H2N2 last circulated in the population. Five subjects in Group 1 received one injection of 20 mcg dose vaccine at Day 0 to test if it is safe. Then, five additional subjects in Group 2 received a total of two injections of a 60 mcg dose on Day 0 and 16 weeks later. In Part II, responses were evaluated from adults born before 1966 who may have prior potential exposure to H2N2 influenza as well as adults similar to those enrolled in Part I who are not expected to have H2N2 exposure. Also, Part II compared responses to 2 different vaccine regimens. Group 3 subjects received a DNA influenza vaccine prime at Day 0 and the HA Ferritin vaccine boost 16 weeks later. Group 4 subjects received the HA Ferritin vaccine 2 times, on Day 0 and 16 weeks later.
This prospective annual release study is designed to evaluate the safety of 1 new influenza virus vaccine strain to be included in FluMist Quadrivalent for the 2017-2018 influenza season.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of one dose of H7N9 pandemic live attenuated influenza vaccine (H7N9 pLAIV) followed by AS03-adjuvanted H7N9 pandemic inactivated influenza vaccine (H7N9 pIIV).
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the immune response produced by a seasonal live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) when compared to placebo. The initial vaccination will be followed 2 months later by an inpatient trial evaluating safety, infectivity, clinical response, and viral shedding after exposure to the wild-type A/California/2009-like influenza challenge virus.
This study will evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of the H3N2v MN 2010/AA ca live attenuated influenza vaccine (H3N2v LAIV) in healthy children and adults, 6 to 26 years old.
This Phase 3 study evaluates the safety, immunogenicity and lot-to lot consistency of 3 lots of aH5N1c vaccine for pandemic avian influenza, in approximately 2394 healthy adults ≥18 years of age receiving the vaccine and 797 healthy adults receiving placebo. Subjects were randomized in a 3:1 ratio to receive either aH5N1c vaccine or saline placebo. Enrollment was stratified by age: 18 to \<65 years of age and ≥65 years of age, to allow adequate safety assessment of the entire age spectrum.
This Phase 2 Quadrivalent VLP Vaccine study is intended to replicate and extend the immunogenicity and safety results obtained in earlier Phase 1-2 and Phase 2 studies. The study is being conducted to evaluate that the immunogenicity profile of the Quadrivalent VLP Vaccine meets the US Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) licensure criteria and to evaluate if the immunogenicity and the safety profile of the Quadrivalent VLP Vaccine is acceptable and comparable to that of the FluLaval® Tetra and Fluzone® High-Dose (HD). The study will also help to define the optimal dose in this population, establish potential competitive advantages, and support the design of future studies.