5 Clinical Trials for Various Conditions
The objective of this study is to compare the effects of intravenous fluid rate on the course of labor in nulliparous patients who are undergoing labor induction and have an unfavorable cervix. The primary hypothesis is that an increased rate of intravenous fluids will shorten the length of labor in patients undergoing induction with an unfavorable cervix.
The purpose of this study is to study if misoprostol administered orally is at least as effective as misoprostol administered vaginally for cervical ripening and the induction of labor. The main purpose is to show that oral misoprostol administration is non-inferior to vaginal misoprostol administration with respect to the time interval from misoprostol administration to onset of active phase of labor. The study is a non-inferiority, prospective randomized controlled trial comparing oral misoprostol given as 25 mcg every 2 hours versus vaginal misoprostol given as 25 mcg every 4 hours.
The overall purpose of this study is to determine if adding oxytocin to a Foley catheter for induction of labor will increase the rate of delivery within 24 hours stratified by parity.
International Observational E-Registry on the use of DILAPAN-S® osmotic dilator / DILASOFT® osmotic dilator for cervical ripening prior to labour induction.
This study represents the first randomized trial comparing traditional inpatient induction with a transcervical foley catheter versus outpatient induction with immediate removal of a transcervical foley catheter. The immediate removal technique allows the induction process to begin in the hospital setting, but allows the patient to go home without a foreign body in situ. The investigators hypothesize the outpatient group will spend less time hospitalized prior to discharge. Additionally, the investigators will explore the vaginal delivery rates and maternal/neonatal safety profiles between groups.