9 Clinical Trials for Various Conditions
Implanted cardiac devices are commonly used to treat a wide variety of heart diseases, including arrhythmias, cardiac resynchronization in select heart failure patients, and life threatening heart rhythms. Approximately 400,000 devices are implanted annually, and more than 3 million patients currently have implanted devices1. Implanted cardiac devices are made to 2 components, the can and the leads. The can contains the electric circuits and the battery, which must be replaced every 5-10 years. The can is connected to external leads which pass through the subclavian vein, and depending on the device, into the vena cava, right atrium, right ventricle, and/or coronary sinus. Leads typically last longer than the battery, and are simply reconnected to a new can at the time of replacement. Certain clinical situations necessitate lead removal, including pocket infection, device related endocarditis, venous stenosis or occlusion with the need for new access, and removal of abandoned or malfunctioning leads. Removing the leads is technically difficult due to fibrosis, and requires specialized equipment. Compared to lead implantation, extraction of leads is relatively rare, with a life time risk of a device patient needing an extraction in the 1-5% range. Given that this is a relatively rare procedure and is only done at a few centers, documentation of our experiences with lead extraction can lead to ongoing improvements in both procedural techniques and outcomes.
Death and vascular tears occur in up to 1% of the patients undergoing lead extraction procedures. These complications are due to abnormal force vectors during the procedure. The investigators postulate that use of bidirectional traction (superior and inferior directions) and feedback from a digital force gauge is associated with minimal lead displacement compared to conventional lead extraction. Lead displacement is an indirect risk factor for potentially fatal lead extraction complications
To evaluate the use of an occlusion balloon (Bridge™ Occlusion Balloon, Spectranetics) within the Superior Vena Cava in lead extraction patients.
The purpose of this study is to prospectively evaluate intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging as a tool for grading the presence and characterization of intravascular lead adherence (ILA, or scarring) to cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) leads during transvenous lead extraction (TLE) procedures in a multi-center study. IVUS should identify the location and severity of these adhesions, which the investigators will then correlate to difficulty of the extraction procedure using metrics like pulses of laser energy delivered and time required to traverse an area of fibrosis or ILA. The investigators will be focusing primarily on the section from innominate vein (INNV) down through the superior vena cava (SVC) to the right atrium. Using IVUS to view blood vessels and the heart structure is approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Using it as described in this study is off label because of the manner in which it is advanced to the SVC, through the right atrium. While it is not restricted from use in this way, it is not specifically on-label. It should be noted that the use of IVUS during TLE procedures as proposed in this study is routine at the University of Chicago and patients will undergo this procedure regardless of participation in this study. The EP physician team regards the use of IVUS during TLE to be nonsignificant risk.
The primary objectives of this registry is to correlate the amount of fibrosis as documented on Electrocardiogram (ECG) gated Computed Tomography (CT) scans with ease of advancing sheaths over the leads through the SVC zone during lead extraction.
This prospective, multicenter, post-market clinical study was designed to evaluate the outcomes of lead extraction of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIED) using Cook catheter and lead extraction devices for any indication it is used in the commercial setting within the United States and Europe. The purpose of this clinical study is to collect data on the performance of the Cook lead extraction devices for the purpose of supporting publications and presentations
The purpose of this study is to characterize the removability of the Attain StarFix® Model 4195 Left Ventricular (LV) Lead (StarFix®). The goal of the trial is to evaluate the lead removal success in patients that are indicated for left ventricular lead removal. This study is required by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as a condition of approval for the Attain StarFix® Model 4195 LV Lead.
The recent expansion of indications for implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) has changed the population of patients being implanted. Younger and healthier patients are now being implanted for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death. Due to the younger population, the likelihood of the lead failing during the lifetime of the patient is higher and also more likely to need extraction. To reduce the risk of the lead extraction procedure and therefore reduce the number of abandon leads, ICD lead manufacturers are designing leads to offer improved chronic extractability to reduce the morbidity and mortality during these procedures.
For women undergoing percutaneous nerve evaluation (PNE) for the treatment of overactive bladder the first step is the PNE interstim therapy trial. If the PNE works, patients may opt to have the interstim procedure. The purpose of this study is to see if patients who remove their PNE lead at home have the same satisfaction with the PNE trial as those women who have their lead removed in the office.