7 Clinical Trials for Various Conditions
This is a clinical study of patients who have low back pain (for at least 6 months). The goal is to understand, with brain imaging, how auriculotherapy (an acupuncture-like stimulation of the ear) may work to relieve pain. There are 4 total study visits, divided into two pairs of visits that occur before and 5-7 days after receiving either a real or sham auriculotherapy treatment. The cryo-IQ device will be used, to stimulate 7 small areas on both ears with a focused jet of cold as a small amount of compressed gas is released. This is generally not painful, and less invasive, compared to using needles for auriculotherapy.
VIA Disc NP is a non-surgical intervention intended to supplement nucleus pulposus tissue in degenerated intervertebral discs. This is a prospective, multi-center, single arm, open label study in which subjects with lumbar discogenic pain associated with intervertebral disc degeneration will receive 1 VIA-Disc NP treatment to each affected level (up to 2 levels).
This clinical trial evaluate the safety, tolerability and exploratory efficacy of targeted single injection of AMG0103 in subject with chronic discogenic lumbar back pain
The purpose of this investigation is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the TRIUMPH® Lumbar Artificial Disc for the treatment of patients who are suffering from Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD) at one level from L1 to S1.
This is a multi-center, randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial comparing hemocyte autograft (platelet rich plasma) to control injection (placebo) in subjects with reported cervical, thoracic or lumbar pain for at least 3 months with Pfirrmann grade changes at 7 or less and who are being considered for discography in order to identify pain generator discs in evaluation of potential surgical candidates.
1. To demonstrate clinically significant improvements in patients undergoing lumbar interlaminar epidurals. Improvement will be assessed in relation to the clinical outcome measures of pain and function. 2. To evaluate and compare the adverse event profile in all patients.
To demonstrate clinically significant improvements or lack thereof in the caudal epidural patients with our without steroids. To evaluate differences in outcomes in patients receiving steroids compared to those patients randomized to the local anesthetic group who did not receive steroids. To assess improvements among patients and compare steroid groups with each other and local anesthetic group. To evaluate and compare the adverse event profile in all patients