126 Clinical Trials for Various Conditions
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Zip-stitch® Vaginal Cuff Closure System. This will be primarily done by measuring the frequency of implant passing following system use. Also assessed will be relevant safety and efficacy endpoints as compared to a two-to-one reference group.
Evaluate surgical treatment outcomes and identify best practice guidelines for complex adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients treated with minimally invasive approach, including radiographic and clinical outcomes, surgical and postoperative complications, risk factors for and revision surgery rates, and the role of standard work to improve patient outcomes and reduce surgical and postoperative complications.
Phase 2, multicenter, efficacy and safety study evaluating the use of nerindocianine for the delineation of abdominopelvic ureter anatomy via near infrared fluorescence imaging during minimally invasive lower abdominal surgery (e.g. gynecological, lower gastrointestinal, or other lower abdominal surgery).
This is a prospective, multi-center, randomized non-inferiority phase III study to evaluate if patients undergoing a minimally invasive surgery for early stage uterine cancer have cancer cells in the fluid that is obtained at the time of their surgery when a uterine manipulator is placed versus patients who do not have a uterine manipulator placed.
This phase III trial compares minimally invasive surgery (MIS) to laparotomy in treating patients with stage IIIC-IV ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer who are receiving chemotherapy before and after surgery (neoadjuvant chemotherapy). MIS is a surgical procedure that uses small incision(s) and is intended to produce minimal blood loss and pain for the patient. Laparotomy is a surgical procedure which allows the doctors to remove some or all of the tumor and check if the disease has spread to other organs in the body. MIS may work the same or better than standard laparotomy after chemotherapy in prolonging the return of the disease and/or improving quality of life after surgery.
Background: A germline mutation is a change to a person s genes that is carried through their DNA. These mutations can be passed on from parents to their offspring. Germline mutations in a gene called BAP1 are linked to the development of mesothelioma and other cancers. Researchers want to follow people with these mutations to learn more. Objective: To see if researchers can improve how people who have or are suspected to have a BAP1 mutation are monitored over time. Eligibility: People age 30 and older who are suspected to have a BAP1 germline mutation. Design: Participants will be screened with a personal and family medical history. Their medical records may be reviewed. They will give a blood or saliva sample to test for a BAP1 mutation. They will get genetic counseling. To take part in this study, participants will enroll on 2 to 3 other protocols. Participants will have a physical exam. They may have a tumor biopsy. They will give blood and urine samples. They will have skin and eye exams. Some participants will have video-assisted thoracoscopy to examine the chest and lungs and diagnose suspicious areas. For this, a small camera is inserted into the chest through a small incision. Some participants will have laparoscopy to examine the organs inside the abdomen. For this, a small camera is inserted into the abdomen through a small incision. Participants will have imaging scans of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis. They may have brain scans. Participants will visit the NIH once a year for follow-up exams. Participation lasts indefinitely.
The objective of this study is to test the technical feasibility of LapAR visualization system for guiding laparoscopic surgeries and to gather clinical feedback on the use of this tool.
SALLY studies sacroiliac joint fusion with the iFuse-3D implant.
The purpose of this clinical trial is to study the safety and efficacy of an investigational imaging agent for delineation/visualization of urologic anatomy in the setting of minimally invasive surgery.
The purpose of this study is to examine the psychological and psychosocial impact of surgical scars after minimally invasive surgery (MIS). 100 adult patients who are about to undergo bariatric procedures through the Duke Metabolic \& Weight Loss Surgery program will be enrolled in this study. 50 patients will be randomly assigned to standard laparoscopic surgery and 50 will be assigned to the percutaneous group. All patients will complete pre-operative psychometric testing to establish a baseline body-image score as well as a patient's initial subjective perceptions around surgery and surgical scars. Follow-up visits will be done at standard of care timepoints - 3 weeks, 3 and 6 months, and 1 year after surgery. Subjects will complete the same psychometric measures to identify differences in psychological and psychosocial responses to standard laparoscopic and percutaneous scars. Patients will also complete a measure on scar satisfaction. The investigators hope to identify any differences between standard laparoscopic versus percutaneous approaches.
Aim: To compare the postoperative outcomes after surgical infiltration with plain bupivacaine compared to liposomal bupivacaine in patients undergoing elective, minimally invasive, general surgery procedures. To the investigators knowledge, there are no head-to-head, prospective, randomized, controlled trials of plain bupivacaine versus liposomal bupivacaine to evaluate postoperative pain and return of function.
The aim of this controlled study is to assess the clinical outcomes and patient reported outcomes of using minimally invasive surgical procedure with Straumann Emdogain as an adjunct (test treatment) or without Straumann Emdogain (control treatment).
The purpose of this study is to collect information on the effect of minimally invasive spine tumor decompression on treated patients. This treatment option is less invasive that the standard surgical decompression and is expected to result in better wound healing, decreased tissue trauma, and decreased pain after surgery.
Prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) Guided cystogastrostomy or cystoduodenostomy and endoscopic necrosectomy to minimally invasive surgical necrosectomy, in patients with necrotizing pancreatitis.
A phase III, randomized, case-controlled, open-label, 500-subject clinical trial of minimally invasive surgery plus rt-PA in the treatment of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH).
Hallux valgus is a common deformity of the big toe, defined as medial deviation of the first metatarsal bone along with lateral deviation of the first toe. Surgery has been shown to be beneficial when compared to orthotics or no treatment. While generally effective, surgery is associated with significant post-operative pain and disability, with several weeks of limited mobility. Minimally invasive techniques have the potential to lead to increased patient satisfaction while still achieving adequate correction of the deformity. This trial is a non-inferiority treatment study, with open-label, randomized, prospective, controlled, parallel experimental design, to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of a minimally invasive surgery versus a conventional surgery for hallux valgus. This trial examines two different surgical interventions. No drug or device is being evaluated in this trial. 60 to 100 patients, over the age of 18 years, undergoing surgical correction of mild to moderate hallux valgus will be enrolled in the trial. The patients will be randomized to two groups, one treated with a conventional distal osteotomy surgery, the other treated with a minimally invasive surgery. Randomization will occur immediately prior to surgery via a multitude of opaque envelopes containing a coded group assignment. Due to the differences in the techniques, neither the investigator and the subject can be effectively blinded to the group assignment. Data collection for the outcomes measures will occur preop, and then post of at 2 weeks, 12 weeks, and at 1,2, and 3 years. The primary outcomes measure is the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire Score (MOXFQ). Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire' (MOXFQ), a 16 item patient-reported questionnaire consisting of three domains/scales: 'Walking/standing' (seven items), 'Pain' (five items) and 'Social interaction' (four items). The MOXFQ is a validated disease-specific outcomes scale for foot and ankle surgery which has been shown to be responsive and reliable. Secondary outcome measures are preoperative to postoperative change in hallux valgus angle (HVA). Radiographic outcomes parameters will be measured using weight-bearing radiographs to analyze preoperative and postoperative hallux valgus angle, and the correction or normalization thereof. (Degrees of correction = 2 week preoperative HVA - 12 week postoperative HVA.)
The hypothesis of the proposed study is that performing total knee arthroplasty through a mini subvastus approach results in statistically significant differences in one or more of the above functional outcome measures, when compared in a blinded, prospective, controlled, randomized manner to mini-medial arthrotomy approach. 1. Analyses of lower extremity functional activities (gait and stairs) 2. Strength of thigh musculature 3. Self-assessment of the functional outcomes 4. Return to the activities of daily living and sports activities
The primary purpose of the study is to establish the degree and duration of pain relief following minimally invasive surgery for a painful degenerative disc.
The purpose of this study is to compare a minimally invasive surgical procedure and medication management in stroke patients with Atrial Fibrillation. The two treatment options are a minimally invasive surgical procedure or the use of medications.
This randomized clinical trial studies minimally invasive surgery in treating patients with spinal tumors. Posterior spinal tumor resection and anterior and posterior spinal tumor resection are less invasive types of surgery for spinal tumors and may have fewer side effects and improve recovery
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of minimally invasive surgery for atrial fibrillation.
The Minimally Invasive Surgery Team (MIST) are establishing a separate research database to find out more about patient's undergoing minimally invasive surgery (laparoscopic , open and robot assisted) procedures at UCSD. The hope is that collection of this information will give physicians a better knowledge and understanding of the benefits of minimally invasive surgery and possibly assist physicians to better manage future patients.
This is an observational study of pain and outcomes from patients undergoing transgastric NOTES removal of their appendix or gallbladder. Subjects who elect to have a transgastric NOTES removal of their appendix or gallbladder and agree to be in this study (through signature on the informed consent form) will be followed per standard of care, with additional follow-up for data collection including the following: * Subjects will complete a 7 day pain/temperature log after surgery * Subjects will receive a phone call at 6 months and at 1 year after surgery to capture data related to safety, adverse events, hospitalizations and patient satisfaction Additional data related to pain and outcomes will be collected at baseline/screening and at follow-up as necessary.
This is an observational study of pain and outcomes from females undergoing transvaginal NOTES removal of their appendix or gallbladder. Female subjects who elect to have a transvaginal NOTES removal of their appendix or gallbladder and agree to be in this study (through signature on the informed consent form) will be followed per standard of care, with additional follow-up for data collection including the following: * Subjects will complete a 7 day pain/temperature log after surgery * Subjects will complete a standardized sexual function questionnaire (Female Sexual Function Index) prior to surgery and 6 months after surgery * Subjects will receive a phone call at 6 months and at 1 year after surgery to capture data related to safety, adverse events, hospitalizations and patient satisfaction Additional data related to pain and outcomes will be collected at baseline/screening and at follow-up as necessary.
The functional flexion axis of the knee can be established by computer-assisted intra-operative data, through range of motion techniques, not specific landmarks such as epicondyles.
The purpose of this trial is to determine the safety of using a combination of minimally invasive surgery and clot lysis with rt-PA to remove intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). The ICES arm of the trial will determine the safety of endoscopic surgery to remove ICH. All MISTIE intention to treat subjects represent the hypothesized test group. The ICES cohort is to be analyzed separately.
The primary objective of this randomized clinical trial is to determine the efficacy and safety of three treatments for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH): transurethral needle ablation (TUNA), transurethral microwave therapy (TUMT), and medical therapy with alfuzosin and finasteride.
The purpose of the registry is to confirm the safety and performance of the Signia™ Small Diameter Reload (SDR) when used in surgical procedures in a real-world setting in patients receiving surgery for indicated thoracic, abdominal, and pediatric applications, intraoperatively.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether an educational video about patients' perioperative experience (period that spans from the time of admission to the hospital to the time of recovery after surgery) will affect the timing of hospital discharge. The researchers will use information collected during this study to create a questionnaire and an educational video related to the patient perioperative experience. The educational video will address patient concerns about the perioperative period and recovery after surgery (post-operative recovery). All participants in this study will be undergoing a MIS hysterectomy according to their routine care in the Gynecology
This prospective, randomized control trial will evaluate patient satisfaction with the number of postoperative follow up visits after minimally invasive hysterectomy for the treatment of non-cancerous conditions at an urban academic hospital in Louisville, Kentucky. Patients will be randomized to receive either a two and six week postoperative follow up visits versus a postoperative follow up visit at six weeks alone.