Treatment Trials

18 Clinical Trials for Various Conditions

Focus your search

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
A Comparative Analysis of Two Hyaluronic Acid Fillers for Nasolabial Fold Correction
Description

This is a randomized, split-face, subject-blinded, comparative study. Subjects will receive initial treatment with Defyne on one of the NLFs and with RHA3 on the other based on the pre-determined randomization. 4 weeks after the initial treatment, subjects will receive optional touch-up on one side or both sides at the Investigator's discretion for optimal correction. Subjects to return to the site at Month 3, 6, and 12 for follow-ups.

Conditions
COMPLETED
Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of Revanesse® Ultra + vs Revanesse® Ultra for Correction of NLF
Description

A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Split-Face Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Revanesse® Ultra + (with Lidocaine) versus Revanesse® Ultra for the Correction of Nasolabial Folds to compare the safety and efficacy profiles of Revanesse® Ultra + (with lidocaine, hereafter referred to as Revanesse Ultra +) to Revanesse Ultra for subjects undergoing correction of nasolabial folds (NLFs)

COMPLETED
Effectiveness and Safety of Princess FILLER Lidocaine in Correction of Nasolabial Folds (NLF)
Description

Clinical Investigation to demonstrate the effectiveness and safety of Princess Filler Lidocaine in the correction of moderate to severe nasolabial folds

COMPLETED
Safety and Effectiveness of Sculptra Aesthetic for Correction of Nasolabial Folds.
Description

This study has been designed to evaluate the safety of Sculptra Aesthetic as a single regimen for correction of Nasolabial Fold (NLF) contour deficiencies after changes in reconstitution and injection procedures compared to the approved label.

COMPLETED
TEOSYAL® RHA Ultra Deep and Perlane-L® for the Correction of Nasolabial Folds
Description

The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of TEOSYAL® RHA Ultra Deep versus Perlane-L® in the treatment of moderate to severe nasolabial folds. This is a controlled, randomized, double-blinded, within subject (split-face), multicenter, prospective clinical study.

COMPLETED
TEOSYAL® RHA Global Action, TEOSYAL® RHA Deep Lines, and Juvéderm® Ultra XC for the Correction of Nasolabial Folds
Description

The purpose of this study is 1) to compare the effectiveness and safety of TEOSYAL® RHA Global Action versus Juvéderm® Ultra XC, and 2) to compare the effectiveness and safety of TEOSYAL® RHA Deep Lines versus Juvéderm® Ultra XC, in the treatment of moderate to severe nasolabial folds.

COMPLETED
Pilot Evaluation of Platelet Rich Fibrin Matrix (PRFM) for the Correction of Nasolabial Folds
Description

Platelets are a component of blood, which contain factors which can enhance wound healing. This study proposes to evaluate the clinical response of laugh lines treated with a concentrated preparation of the subject's own platelets injected into or under the skin by taking serial photographs of the subject's face over a 12 week period. Also, the same preparation will be injected into or under the skin of the arm near the elbows, and serial biopsies will be taken over a 12 week period.

COMPLETED
A Study to Compare the Safety and Effectiveness of a Non-FDA Approved Device Dermal Gel Extra (DGE) and an FDA Approved Device for the Correction of Nasolabial Folds (NLFs)
Description

The purpose of this research study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of injection with DGE Injectable Gel (hyaluronic acid with lidocaine manufactured by Genzyme Biosurgery) as compared to injection with Restylane (a Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved dermal filler) in patients undergoing cutaneous correction of the nasolabial folds (NLFs).

COMPLETED
A Study to Compare Subject Comfort During and After Injections With the Study Products and the Safety of the Non-FDA Approved Product for the Correction of Nasolabial Folds (NLFs)
Description

The purpose of this research study is to compare subject comfort during and after injection with NADGL and Captique® Injectable Gel, in the nasolabial folds. Captique® is an FDA-approved product without lidocaine and is manufactured by Genzyme Biosurgery (Ridgefield, NJ). NADGL is a new product (not FDA approved) with lidocaine and is also manufactured by Genzyme Biosurgery. We do not know which of these treatments results in less pain during and after injection. The safety of NADGL is also being studied.

Conditions
COMPLETED
Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of CosmetaLife™ for the Correction of Nasolabial Folds
Description

This is a randomized, double-blind pivotal study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of CosmetaLife injectable dermal filler for the correction of wrinkles and folds, such as nasolabial folds (i.e., smile lines).

Conditions
COMPLETED
A Post-Market Study to Evaluate Adverse Event Incidence Rates in Patients With Skin of Color Undergoing Correction of Nasolabial Folds With Hylaform, Hylaform Plus and Captique.
Description

To assess the likelihood of keloid and scar formation, pigmentation disorders and hypersensitivity reactions in patients with skin of color undergoing correction of facial soft tissue contour deficiencies with Hylaform, Hylaform Plus or Captique.

Conditions
UNKNOWN
Injection Assistance Device Versus Manual Injections for Delivery of Dermal Fillers
Description

The purpose of this study is to characterize the safety and performance in normal therapeutic use of the Artiste System in comparison to standard manual administration of dermal fillers. Subjects are recruited from the investigator's practice and randomized to receive treatment with the Artiste System on either the left or right nasolabial fold, the contralateral fold to be treated with standard manual injections. Treatments occur in a single session to achieve optimal cosmetic results (OCR) balanced on both sides. Investigators are encouraged to use a variety of types and brands of dermal fillers, recruiting subjects for the study as necessary. Safety and performance evaluations will be made through a combination of clinical observations, questionnaires for the subject and for the Treating Investigator, and spontaneous reports of adverse events. There are 6 required study visits: Screening, Day 1 (Treatment Day), Day 3, Day 8, Day 15, and Day 29.

COMPLETED
PREVELLE Shape (CX002) Dermal Filler Protocol
Description

The purpose of this study was to assess PREVELLE Shape (CX002), with respect to safety and efficacy for one year following treatment, for correction of facial nasolabial folds and when applied as an intradermal implant for lip augmentation.

COMPLETED
Safety Study That Compares Perlane to Perlane With Lidocaine (Perlane-L) While Correcting Wrinkles in the Area Around Your Nose
Description

Safety study that compares Perlane to Perlane with Lidocaine while correcting wrinkles in the area around your nose.

COMPLETED
Safety & Tolerability Study That Compares Restylane to Restylane With Lidocaine While Correcting Wrinkles in the Nasolabial Folds
Description

Safety \& tolerability study that compares Restylane to Restylane with Lidocaine (Restylane-L) while correcting wrinkles in the area around your nose.

COMPLETED
Evaluation of Pain With Belotero® Balance With Integral Lidocaine for Correction of the Nasolabial Folds
Description

Demonstrate the effectiveness of Belotero Balance with lidocaine (Test group) for the reduction of injection-related pain in comparison to Belotero Balance without lidocaine (Control group) for the correction of NLFs. Identify and describe adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) during the course of the study. Additionally, common treatment site responses (CTRs) will be assessed.

RECRUITING
Safety and Effectiveness of ELLANSÉ®-S Dermal Filler in the Treatment of Nasolabial Folds
Description

The study will be a prospective, randomized, multi-center, split-face, controlled, double-blind clinical trial to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of ELLANSÉ®-S for the treatment of NLFs. Subjects will be randomized to receive treatment (ELLANSÉ®-S) in one NLF and control (Radiesse®) in the contralateral NLF. A total of 126 subjects will be treated. The control and test articles will be supplied in sterile ready-to-use, pre-filled syringes. Initial treatment and any 4-week touch-up will be done consistent with initial randomization. Any retreatment(s) in either NLF will be with ELLANSÉ®-S. Subjects who meet Inclusion/Exclusion criteria will receive an initial treatment, an optional touch up at the 4-week visit, and may be eligible to receive retreatment at either 12 or 18 months after treatment (determined by when the fold has returned to baseline score, or the fold has lost at least 1 point on the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) from optimal improvement). Retreatment to one side is allowed if only one side qualifies, but the other side may not be retreated at a later visit. If retreatment occurs, the subject may also be eligible to receive an optional touch up at the 4-week follow up visit. If a touch up occurs after the initial or retreatment injection, the subject will return for an additional safety visit 2 weeks after each injection. A week 4 safety visit will occur after retreatment touch-up. Primary effectiveness will be assessed at 6 months. All subjects will be followed for a minimum of 24 months after the initial treatment phase. After each injection, subjects will be contacted by telephone call/email after 72 hours and will return for a safety visit 2 weeks after treatment. At the week 4 visit, subjects will be assessed for a touch up. If a touch up is indicated as determined by the investigator, the investigator will use the same material as that used for initial treatment for the respective side. In addition, subjects will be seen at 6 weeks 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months (from the end of the initial treatment phase). Subjects receiving a retreatment (at 12 or 18 months after treatment) will return for additional safety visits at 2 weeks and 3 and 6 months after this retreatment (the 6 month coincides with regularly scheduled visit). Subjects will have the option of a retreatment touch up injection at 4 weeks after retreatment, and if they do will have another call at 72hrs and a week 2 safety visit. The validated Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale will be used for assessment of the primary effectiveness endpoint (1). Assessment of the secondary effectiveness endpoints will include use of WSRS, the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS), VAS pain assessment, the validated FACE-Q Appraisal of Nasolabial Folds Questionnaire, the FACE-Q Satisfaction with Treatment Outcome Scale and the FACE-Q Age Appraisal VAS. The study will last approximately 30 months. All subjects will be recruited within approximately 6 months after the recruitment of the first subject and followed for a minimum of 24 months after the initial treatment visit. Subjects receiving a retreatment (at 12 or 18 months) will receive a telephone call/email 72 hours after retreatment and they will return for an additional safety visit 2 weeks after retreatment. Subjects may receive a retreatment touch up at 4 weeks after retreatment, and if touched up, will have safety visits at 2 and 4 weeks. All retreated subjects will also be asked to attend month 3 and month 6 safety visits. The 6-month safety visit will correspond with the next study visit (e.g., 18 month or 24-month visit depending on when they are reinjected) 126 male and female subjects will be enrolled. This enrollment number accounts for a 20% attrition rate, to ensure an adequate safety population for long-term follow-up, and a Per Protocol Set (PPS) of at least 101 NLFs per treatment arm. At least 20% of treated subjects will have Fitzpatrick Skin Types IV, V, and VI. Of these, at least, 10% will be Type IV, 5% Type V and 5% Type VI. The investigative sites will be encouraged to enroll both male and female subjects. In addition, up to 2 non-randomized, non-split-face run-in subjects will be treated with ELLANSÉ®-S by each investigator to allow the investigator to become familiar with injection characteristics. This run-in cohort will be required to meet all study inclusion/exclusion criteria and will be followed in the same manner as the non-run-in cohort. Up to seven US sites will participate.

COMPLETED
Safety and Effectiveness of JUVÉDERM™ Injectable Gel With Lidocaine
Description

Safety and effectiveness of JUVÉDERM™ Injectable Gel with Lidocaine compared to JUVÉDERM™ without Lidocaine for procedural pain in the treatment of nasolabial folds.