28 Clinical Trials for Various Conditions
Study DA-13-007 is a randomized, evaluator-blinded, within subject (split face) multicenter clinical study of DA-13-007l (Injectable poly-l-lactic acid) compared to SCULPTRA in the treatment of nasolabial fold wrinkles. Qualifying subjects will be randomized to receive DA-13-007l and SCULPTRA on either the right or left side of the face.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety profile and the treatment effect of Isolagen TherapyTM compared with placebo when administered to bilateral nasolabial fold wrinkles.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety profile and the treatment effect of Isolagen TherapyTM compared with placebo when administered to bilateral nasolabial fold wrinkles.
This study is being undertaken to: * evaluate the degree of correction attainable with DL6049 (injectable poly-L-lactic acid)compared to a commercially available CosmoPlast™ Collagen Implant in the treatment of dermal nasolabial fold wrinkles at 13 months following the last application of study treatment. * Document the types and incidence of adverse events reported with DL6049 (injectable poly-L-lactic acid)compared with CosmoPlast™ Collagen Implant. Long term adverse events will be assessed for an additional 12 months following discharge from the main study in subjects treated with DL6049.
This study is being undertaken to: * evaluate the degree of correction attainable with DL6049 (injectable poly-L-lactic acid)compared to a commercially available CosmoPlast™ Collagen Implant in the treatment of dermal nasolabial fold wrinkles at 13 months following the last application of study treatment. * Document the types and incidence of adverse events reported with DL6049 (injectable poly-L-lactic acid)compared with CosmoPlast™ Collagen Implant. Long term adverse events will be assessed for an additional 12 months following discharge from the main study in subjects treated with DL6049.
The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of TEOSYAL® RHA Ultra Deep versus Perlane-L® in the treatment of moderate to severe nasolabial folds. This is a controlled, randomized, double-blinded, within subject (split-face), multicenter, prospective clinical study.
The purpose of this study is 1) to compare the effectiveness and safety of TEOSYAL® RHA Global Action versus Juvéderm® Ultra XC, and 2) to compare the effectiveness and safety of TEOSYAL® RHA Deep Lines versus Juvéderm® Ultra XC, in the treatment of moderate to severe nasolabial folds.
A total of 75 subjects will be enrolled into a 36 month study. Subjects will be treated with Restylane® on both sides of the face (nasolabial folds) at the first visit, on one side of the face at month 4.5 and on the other side of the face at month 9. Both sides of the face will then be treated again at month 18. The subjects will evaluate themselves and will also be evaluated by the treating doctor and a blinded evaluator (a person that does not know when the different sides of the face are treated). Side effects and medications taken during the study will also be recorded.
Safety \& tolerability study that compares Restylane to Restylane with Lidocaine (Restylane-L) while correcting wrinkles in the area around your nose.
The purpose of this research study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of injection with DGE Injectable Gel (hyaluronic acid with lidocaine manufactured by Genzyme Biosurgery) as compared to injection with Restylane (a Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved dermal filler) in patients undergoing cutaneous correction of the nasolabial folds (NLFs).
To assess pain during nasolabial fold treatment using Radiesse® Injectable Dermal Filler mixed with lidocaine.
Post marketing study to assess the likelihood of hypertropic scarring, keloid formation and hyper- or hypopigmentation in patients with Fitzpatrick Skin Types IV, V, and VI receiving nasolabial fold treatment with Radiesse® Injectable Dermal Filler
The study will be a prospective, randomized, multi-center, split-face, controlled, double-blind clinical trial to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of ELLANSÉ®-S for the treatment of NLFs. Subjects will be randomized to receive treatment (ELLANSÉ®-S) in one NLF and control (Radiesse®) in the contralateral NLF. A total of 126 subjects will be treated. The control and test articles will be supplied in sterile ready-to-use, pre-filled syringes. Initial treatment and any 4-week touch-up will be done consistent with initial randomization. Any retreatment(s) in either NLF will be with ELLANSÉ®-S. Subjects who meet Inclusion/Exclusion criteria will receive an initial treatment, an optional touch up at the 4-week visit, and may be eligible to receive retreatment at either 12 or 18 months after treatment (determined by when the fold has returned to baseline score, or the fold has lost at least 1 point on the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) from optimal improvement). Retreatment to one side is allowed if only one side qualifies, but the other side may not be retreated at a later visit. If retreatment occurs, the subject may also be eligible to receive an optional touch up at the 4-week follow up visit. If a touch up occurs after the initial or retreatment injection, the subject will return for an additional safety visit 2 weeks after each injection. A week 4 safety visit will occur after retreatment touch-up. Primary effectiveness will be assessed at 6 months. All subjects will be followed for a minimum of 24 months after the initial treatment phase. After each injection, subjects will be contacted by telephone call/email after 72 hours and will return for a safety visit 2 weeks after treatment. At the week 4 visit, subjects will be assessed for a touch up. If a touch up is indicated as determined by the investigator, the investigator will use the same material as that used for initial treatment for the respective side. In addition, subjects will be seen at 6 weeks 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months (from the end of the initial treatment phase). Subjects receiving a retreatment (at 12 or 18 months after treatment) will return for additional safety visits at 2 weeks and 3 and 6 months after this retreatment (the 6 month coincides with regularly scheduled visit). Subjects will have the option of a retreatment touch up injection at 4 weeks after retreatment, and if they do will have another call at 72hrs and a week 2 safety visit. The validated Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale will be used for assessment of the primary effectiveness endpoint (1). Assessment of the secondary effectiveness endpoints will include use of WSRS, the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS), VAS pain assessment, the validated FACE-Q Appraisal of Nasolabial Folds Questionnaire, the FACE-Q Satisfaction with Treatment Outcome Scale and the FACE-Q Age Appraisal VAS. The study will last approximately 30 months. All subjects will be recruited within approximately 6 months after the recruitment of the first subject and followed for a minimum of 24 months after the initial treatment visit. Subjects receiving a retreatment (at 12 or 18 months) will receive a telephone call/email 72 hours after retreatment and they will return for an additional safety visit 2 weeks after retreatment. Subjects may receive a retreatment touch up at 4 weeks after retreatment, and if touched up, will have safety visits at 2 and 4 weeks. All retreated subjects will also be asked to attend month 3 and month 6 safety visits. The 6-month safety visit will correspond with the next study visit (e.g., 18 month or 24-month visit depending on when they are reinjected) 126 male and female subjects will be enrolled. This enrollment number accounts for a 20% attrition rate, to ensure an adequate safety population for long-term follow-up, and a Per Protocol Set (PPS) of at least 101 NLFs per treatment arm. At least 20% of treated subjects will have Fitzpatrick Skin Types IV, V, and VI. Of these, at least, 10% will be Type IV, 5% Type V and 5% Type VI. The investigative sites will be encouraged to enroll both male and female subjects. In addition, up to 2 non-randomized, non-split-face run-in subjects will be treated with ELLANSÉ®-S by each investigator to allow the investigator to become familiar with injection characteristics. This run-in cohort will be required to meet all study inclusion/exclusion criteria and will be followed in the same manner as the non-run-in cohort. Up to seven US sites will participate.
This is a randomized, split-face, subject-blinded, comparative study. Subjects will receive initial treatment with Defyne on one of the NLFs and with RHA3 on the other based on the pre-determined randomization. 4 weeks after the initial treatment, subjects will receive optional touch-up on one side or both sides at the Investigator's discretion for optimal correction. Subjects to return to the site at Month 3, 6, and 12 for follow-ups.
Safety study that compares Perlane to Perlane with Lidocaine while correcting wrinkles in the area around your nose.
The purpose of this research study is to compare subject comfort during and after injection with NADGL and Captique® Injectable Gel, in the nasolabial folds. Captique® is an FDA-approved product without lidocaine and is manufactured by Genzyme Biosurgery (Ridgefield, NJ). NADGL is a new product (not FDA approved) with lidocaine and is also manufactured by Genzyme Biosurgery. We do not know which of these treatments results in less pain during and after injection. The safety of NADGL is also being studied.
This is a randomized, double-blind pivotal study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of CosmetaLife injectable dermal filler for the correction of wrinkles and folds, such as nasolabial folds (i.e., smile lines).
The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of Aquamid and Restylane in aesthetically enhancing nasolabial folds 6 months after treatment and to evaluate the safety of Aquamid through 12 months after treatment. The study includes an extended follow up to 24 months.
To assess the likelihood of keloid and scar formation, pigmentation disorders and hypersensitivity reactions in patients with skin of color undergoing correction of facial soft tissue contour deficiencies with Hylaform, Hylaform Plus or Captique.
The study device, Sculptra, is an injectable implant formulation of poly-L-lactic acid microbeads, approved by the FDA for treatment of facial fat loss (lipoatrophy of HIV disease). It is being used off-label by dermatologists to treat dermal defects, as a biologically active filler. Anecdotal evidence suggests that subjects' skin quality may improve as a result of poly-L-lactic acid injection. While this is not the primary goal of such treatments it is often seen and described as so called "Sculptra glow". Based upon the study doctor's experience global skin quality improvement includes radiance, smoothness and pigment uniformity as well as a decrease in skin redness and pore size. In this study we evaluate the existence of histopathological (microscopic examination of tissue) evidence that can explain the observed improvement of skin quality after poly-L-lactic acid injections. Specifically, we will use histopathologic techniques to investigate effects of Sculptra injections into human skin with regard to restoring skin health and epidermal thickness.
This is a randomized, controlled, single-blinded, within-subject (split-face), multicenter, prospective study to investigate whether RHA®4 injected in NLFs with a cannula is non-inferior to RHA®4 injected in NLFs with a sharp needle (27G x ½") for the correction of moderate to severe NLFs as determined by the Blinded Live Evaluator (BLE) using the Teoxyne NLF-WSRS (proprietary, validated NLF Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale) at 12 weeks from last treatment. At Visit 1 (Week 0), RHA®4 injected with cannula will be administered in a random sequence (first or second injection) and side of the face (left or right NLF) and RHA®4 injected with a sharp needle will be administered to the other side. The TI will administer study devices and will be unblinded to treatment allocation. Blinded assessments of effectiveness will be conducted by the BLE (Blinded Live Evaluator). 4 weeks following initial treatment, subjects will attend Visit 2 and receive, if necessary, touch-up treatments (using a needle or cannula as per the subject's initial treatment assignment). Subjects receiving touch-up treatments at Week 4 (Visit 2) will attend a new Visit 2b (4 weeks following touch-up treatment); subject not receiving touch-up treatment will not attend Visit 2b. After each injection (initial treatment or touch-up), subjects will receive a safety follow-up call from the study site within 3-day. Subjects will then attend scheduled in-office study visits at 8 (Visit 3) and 12 weeks (Visit 4) following last treatment (initial treatment or touch-up) where safety and effectiveness assessments will be conducted.
Study is designed to assess the long-term safety of Sculptra Aesthetic in immune-competent subjects as a single regimen for correction of nasolabial fold (NLF) contour deficiencies and other facial wrinkles.
Elevess is intended for all skin types. However, further study of all soft tissue fillers is needed in people of color because of the increasing use of cosmetic dermal filler products. This study is designed to evaluate the safety of an injectable hyaluronic acid based dermal filler Elevess (Anika Therapeutics, Inc., Bedford, MA). Safety will be evaluated by incidence and severity of keloid formation and pigmentation changes, and other potential adverse events in people with Fitzpatrick skin types IV, V and VI who have elected to undergo nasolabial fold (NLF) treatment with Elevess. 1. Fitzpatrick Classification of Skin Type as: IV - Burns minimally, always tans well (moderate/light brown skin; Mediterranean, Asian, Hispanic. V - Rarely burns, tans profusely (dark brown/brown skin: Middle eastern, Latin, light skinned Black, Indian) VI - Never burns, (deeply pigmented dark brown to black skin;Black)
This is a study to assess how safe and effective an investigational product, Belotero® is in people with all skin types with facial wrinkles, such as nasolabial folds. Nasolabial folds are wrinkles on the face that go from outside of the nostrils to the edges of the mouth.
This study is to determine the safety and effectiveness of Belotero® Soft compared to active comparator in the correction of mild facial wrinkles, such as nasolabial folds.
This was a study to find out how an investigational product, Belotero, compares to a second product in people with facial wrinkles, such as nasolabial folds. Nasolabial folds are wrinkles on the face that go from the outside of the nostrils to the edges of the mouth. Additionally, this study determined Belotero is safe and tolerable and corrects facial wrinkles, such as nasolabial folds.
Pliaglis® Cream versus compounded topical anesthetic for pain management during Restylane® injections for the correction of nasolabial folds.
Platelet-rich fibrin matrix (PRFM) is made from platelets that are extracted from a patient's blood, and many plastic surgeons and dermatologists have used it to fill in wrinkles and lines on the face. Both patients and doctors have observed that it gives extra volume in these areas and improves overall appearance. However, there is no research that shows how PRFM affects skin quality, such as pores, spots, red areas, and texture. The aim of this study is to determine whether PRFM has a role in rejuvenating facial skin.