4 Clinical Trials for Various Conditions
This grant aims to develop and test a text-messaging intervention for parents of children and teens evaluated in the emergency department for a psychiatric emergency and discharged home with outpatient referrals. The intervention for parents will teach parents skills to navigate the mental health services system and build their self-efficacy in managing their child's mental health. This research has the potential to improve services for families seeking emergency psychiatric support, with the goal of facilitating treatment engagement and reducing emergency services utilization using scalable, cost-effective, accessible tools.
The goal of this clinical trial is to test the I-CARE program in children who are in a medical hospital awaiting inpatient mental health treatment. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Can the I-CARE program be used at the medical hospitals and do the patients and hospital staff like the program? * Does the I-CARE program lower patients' emotional distress, thoughts about suicide or suicide attempts? Patients will complete as many of the 7 I-CARE videos as possible during their stay at the medical hospital and fill out online surveys. There are workbook activities that go with each I-CARE video. A hospital staff member will help the patient do the videos and workbook activities.
The purpose of this study is to compare two different kinds of follow-up care and their effects on psychiatric service use and psychological well-being. This randomized, controlled trial of subjects discharged from the psychiatric emergency services to outpatient care receive traditional hospital-based outpatient clinic referrals (treatment as usual) or appointments for community-based follow-up by a mobile crisis team.
In recent years, there has been an emphasis on assessing patient's pain on presentation to emergency departments. The Joint Commission mandates that all patients who present with pain must have a pain assessment performed and addressed early in their care. Most emergency departments are using a self-reported assessment of pain using a 1-10 scale of pain. This self-reported level of pain is used to determining appropriate treatment. The Joint Commission has only dealt with somatic pain and has not addressed psychological related pain. Many authors have written on psychological pain. It is described as introspective experience of negative emotions such as anger, despair, fear, grief, shame, guilt, hopelessness, loneliness and loss. The assessment of psychological pain has been used to describe patients with depression and suicidal thoughts and behaviors. Study Significance The significance of this study is to determine if patients can communicate the level of psychological pain using the level of agitation as a surrogate marker. Studies have demonstrated that the staff's assessment of a patient's level of agitation is not based on an agitation scale nor uses any patient self-assessment of their level of agitation. If a self-assessment of a patient's level of agitation can be determined early in their care in the emergency setting, a proactive approach to treatment can occur. Proactive agitation treatment has the potential of reducing a patient's agitation and increasing their level of comfort. This early intervention can reduce the progression of agitation and the risk of injury to patients, families and staff. Hypothesis The study null hypothesis is that the self-rated agitation scale will not have a significant level of correlation with the other measures of agitation (Brief Agitation Measure, Positive And Negative Syndrome Scale and Agitation Calmness Evaluation Scale). The secondary null hypothesis is that there is no difference between the level of agitation and the level of psychological pain, assessed with the Psychological Pain Assessment.