43 Clinical Trials for Various Conditions
Prior investigators have evaluated the use of 2-octyl cyanoacrylate (glue) as a method to secure a variety of venous catheters including central/peripheral lines. There is a paucity of research evaluating the use of glue for arterial catheters. The investigators conducted a pilot study to test the null hypothesis that there would be no difference in failure rates between radial arterial lines (r-a-line) secured with glue vs. suture.
Several studies have shown that operator exposure via left transradial catheterization has yielded less operator exposure compared to standard right transradial procedure. However, in light of new data, the investigators hypothesize a hyperadducted right arm during right transradial cardiac catheterization will yield comparable, or the same operator radiation exposure.
Transradial access (TRA) is the preferred vascular access site for invasive coronary angiography. TRA is limited by blockage of the radial artery post-procedurally, preventing future use of TRA. This is referred to as radial artery occlusion (RAO) and occurs in \~5% of cases. While intraprocedural anticoagulation has been studied extensively to mitigate this complication, oral anticoagulation post-TRA has not. The investigators will assess the impact of a one-week course of rivaroxaban post-TRA to reduce the rate of ultrasound-defined RAO at 30 days.
Clinical randomized study to evaluate the effect of using a hydrophobically modified polysaccharide (hm-P) bandage
The purpose of this study is to evaluate methods to modify blood pressure in humans and measure the effectiveness of such methods. A secondary outcome is to evaluate the performance of an investigational continuous non-invasive blood pressure (cNIBP) device created by Sensifree. The tests will per performed in non-hospitalized subjects under varied controlled conditions that include resting blood pressure and non-pharmacologically induced blood pressure changes.
This single-center, prospective, randomized study will evaluate distal radial artery (dRA) vs. proximal radial artery access (pRA) in regards to hand function and radial artery occlusion.
The study team aims to perform a prospective observational case series of one hundred consecutive distal radial artery heart catheterizations to evaluate the safety and feasibility of distal radial access. Distal radial artery access has evolved in the past few years as an alternative to the standard radial artery access for coronary angiography and interventions. However, the available data on the distal radial artery access for coronary angiography and interventions is limited to case reports and small retrospective case series. To date, no prospective randomized data is available. Therefore, the investigators aim to perform a prospective observational case series of one hundred sequential left heart catheterizations performed via distal radial artery to evaluate the safety and feasibility of the distal radial artery access.
Coronary angiography is performed to evaluate for obstructive coronary artery disease. This is commonly performed via the transfemoral or transradial approach with the latter increasing in frequency. One of the most common complications of transradial access is radial artery occlusion occurring in \~5% of patients which prohibits the use of the radial artery in the future. There is evidence to support the use of intraprocedural anticoagulation to mitigate the risk of radial artery occlusion however the role of post-procedural anticoagulation has not been previously evaluated. Rivaroxaban is a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) with a safety profile superior to that of vitamin K antagonists. Given the safety profile, ease of use, and feasibility of DOAC therapy, our study will endeavor to evaluate the use of rivaroxaban 15mg orally once daily for 7 days after transradial access and the impact this has on the rate of radial artery occlusion.
The purpose of this study is to collect data about the efficacy of utilizing distal topical heat application for dilatation of the radial artery. Transradial arterial access is widely accepted as the standard of care for cardiac catheterization procedures due to its increased patient comfort and significantly decreased risk of major vascular complications, and has been recently utilized in increasing volume by the interventional radiology community throughout the world. Due to the small size of the radial artery, catheterization may sometimes be technically difficult. Pre-procedure dilatation can make catheterization significantly easier, and studies have demonstrated the successful ability to dilate the radial artery with the use of topical nitroglycerin and lidocaine. However, the investigators hypothesize that utilizing topical heat applied distally can create a physiologic vasodilatation similar to that created with nitroglycerin and lidocaine, but at a significantly lower cost and with less risk due to no need for application of a medication which has a systemic effect with known side effects. The purpose of this study is to test the efficacy of radial artery vasodilatation with distal topical heat application.
The primary objective of this study is to determine if there is a reduction in time to hemostasis in subjects treated with SoftSeal®-STF hemostatic pad when used in conjunction with a vascular compression device after radial transcatheter procedure.
The primary objective of the study is to determine the role of transdermal vasodilators as an adjunct to parenteral vasodilators in reducing radial artery spasm, improving patient comfort, and post procedure radial artery patency during transradial coronary angiograms and interventions. The study hypothesis is that transdermal vasodilators will increase radial artery size and reduce radial artery spasm as well as improve patient comfort and post procedure radial artery patency. This is a single-center, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study comparing the effect of transdermal preparations of lidocaine + nitroglycerine and lidocaine + placebo on radial artery spasm in patients undergoing transdermal coronary angiograms. Prior to the procedure, each patient will be randomized into either the control arm, lidocaine + placebo, or study arm, lidocaine + nitroglycerine.
Radial artery access is increasingly becoming popular among interventional cardiologists for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI)/ diagnostic angiography secondary to its low complications rates. However, it is frequently associated with the spasm of the radial artery which can lead to difficulty in catheter manipulation during the procedure and potentially leading to vessel trauma. This vessel trauma can cause activation of coagulation system and formation of clot and subsequently the occlusion of radial artery. In this study the investigators intend to find the association of radial artery spasm with the future development of radial artery occlusion in patients who undergo PCI via radial access.
Invasive blood pressure monitoring is achieved by cannulating an artery and transducing the pressure. During arterial cannulation the artery can be located by palpation, but use of ultrasound has increased the success rate of cannulation. A new ultrasound technique for vascular cannulation (dynamic needle tip positioning) has been described. Investigators aim to compare this technique to the palpation technique for arterial cannulation. Investigators hypothesize that the use of this novel ultrasound technique will result in a higher first attempt success rate and overall success compared to palpation. Investigators plan to enroll 310 patients in this study. The participants in the study will have been deemed by the attending anesthesiologist to require a radial arterial line for the operation and thus the research protocol will not involve a deviation from the standard of care.
The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the use of intravascular paclitaxel, in addition to standard therapy, for the treatment of arteriovenous dialysis access fistula stenosis. A fistulogram will be performed in standard fashion. The diagnostic component will include evaluation of the inflow artery, arterial anastomosis and full length of the fistula vein or graft, plus venous return up to the heart. The location, vessel size, lesion diameter and percent stenosis for each lesion will be recorded. Enrollment and randomization will occur at this point. All patients will then receive standard therapy for their stenosis. This will include intravenous heparin administered in a standard dose of 70 units/kg. Lesions that respond poorly to angioplasty (\>30% residual stenosis after angioplasty treatment with 2 inflations) will be stented. Stent selection will be based on clinical setting. Initial stent treatment will utilize an uncovered nitinol stent. Treatment of in-stent restenosis will include initial balloon angioplasty, and use of a covered stent (Viabahn, GORE, or Fluency, Bard). Documentation of location and type of treatment for each lesion treated will be recorded. Once standard treatment is completed, the operating surgeon will be informed of the results of randomization: treatment (paclitaxel) or control. For subjects assigned to treatment, the whole fistula vein outflow segment of the fistula will be treated with paclitaxel. The full length of the radial artery from 1 cm of its origin to fistula anatomosis will be treated with paclitaxel. In addition the anastomosis and first 4 cm of the fistula vein will be treated. Paclitaxel solution treatment of each lesion encountered will be attempted until the 20 mg Paclitaxel dose limit is met. The volume administered will depend on the diameter and length of the vessels treated. Maximization of the length of vessel and lesions treated will be undertaken when there are more lesions than can be accommodated by the 12 mg, 10 ml dose available. A 5 F sheath, 20 cm in length, will be used to administer the paclitaxel. This will be advanced from its distal position in the radial artery over the guidewire so that the tip of the sheath is in the proximal radial artery. Prior to removal of the sheath, a final angiographic study of all areas treated is performed to document patency and lesion appearance. Any additional lesions identified with this study are then treated appropriately following standard technique. For the control group, instead of paclitaxel administration, a sham treatment period of 10 minutes is allowed to elapse followed by the performance of the final completion angiogram. Any additional lesions identified with this study are then treated appropriately following standard technique. All patients will follow the same follow up evaluation schedule
The purpose of this study is to establish the rate of radial artery occlusion post transradial cardiac catheterization through different modalities. The study hypothesis is that specialized imaging can provide specific information to help identify hand complications after cardiac catheterization through the wrist.
The aim of this study is to measure radiation exposure during coronary angiography (CA) with a trans-radial approach (TRA), specifically comparing access via the left versus right radial artery in patients with suggested clinical predictors of TRA failure/difficult. These predictors include age \>70, female gender, height \<64 inches, and history of hypertension.The study also aims to determine difficulties encountered during left or right radial access in this specific patient population. A secondary aim is to compare the results of enrolled patients with a registry of patients where femoral access was obtained. Currently more than 1 million percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) are performed in the United States annually. There is a growing trend to perform procedures utilizing the TRA due to recent data demonstrating decreased bleeding and access-site complications compared to the femoral approach. However, the TRA approach is also know to be associated with greater radiation exposure compared to the femoral approach. Furthermore, the TRA to catheterization may be difficult in certain populations because of anatomic considerations. Though traditionally completed via canalization of the right radial artery (RRA) due to feasibility with room setup, left radial artery (LRA) access may be superior due to the shorter distance needed to reach the ascending aorta and bypassing the tortuosity of the right subclavian artery. Given the benefits of the TRA, it is important to determine how left versus right radial artery access affects parameters of radiation exposure in addition to procedural difficulty. This study will be a prospective, randomized study of patients with suggested predictors of TRA failure/difficulty referred for coronary angiography. Patients referred for coronary angiography using the trans-radial approach will be randomly assigned to obtain arterial access via the right or left radial artery. A registry of patients referred for coronary angiography using the trans-femoral approach will be compiled. The primary outcome measure will be radiation exposure as measured by dose area product output from the coronary angiography system. Secondary measures will include the total fluoroscopy time, total dose of radiation, number of catheters used, and incidence of subclavian tortuosity. In addition, procedural complications and success rates will also be evaluated.
Arterial catheterization is frequently performed on critically ill patients for invasive blood pressure monitoring and/or frequent blood draws, especially arterial blood gas analysis. The distal part of the radial artery (wrist) is the preferred access site. The potential complications of the procedure are mostly minor and comprise temporary occlusion of the radial artery (RA), hematoma, local infection or bleeding from the puncture site. Major complications including vessel aneurysm or occlusion with threat to hand viability are rare. The standard approach to catheterization is "blind" puncture of the RA while locating its pulse by palpation, followed by threading a 20 Gauge (20G) angio-catheter into the vessel. Alternatively ultrasound can be used to locate the vessel and guide needle insertion. To our knowledge, four prospective randomized trials (PRT)5-8 comparing palpation with ultrasound-guided RA catheterization have been conducted so far and one meta-analysis looked at the pooled data obtained from these. The results showed that ultrasound guidance increased the first-attempt success rate at RA catheterization by 71% compared to palpation. The use of ultrasound also significantly reduced the time to successful catheterization, the number of punctures as well as the amount of catheters required per procedure. None of the prior randomized trials has been conducted in an ICU setting and in three out of the four studies the arterial lines were placed in patients undergoing elective surgery. The investigators hypothesized that ultrasound could improve first attempt success rate while placing arterial catheters in an ICU setting. Ultrasound may also reduce total time to successful insertion and reduce complications. The investigators plan to randomize patients to either a palpation technique or ultrasound guided catheter insertion and record the above outcomes.
Radial artery access for cardiac catheterization can require multiple attempts. Multiple attempts increase the time required, patient discomfort, and the risk of arterial spasm. Ultrasound guidance has been shown in other studies to reduce the number of attempts and complications in central venous and femoral artery access. This study will test if the addition of ultrasound guidance reduces the number of attempts and time required to access the radial artery.
The Provisional Heparin TherApy on Radial Artery Occlusion after transradial coronary angiography and patent Hemostasis (PHARAOH) study compares the strategy of standard a-priori heparin use in patients undergoing transradial coronary angiography to a strategy of provisional heparin administration only if patent hemostasis is not achievable.
The purpose of this study is to establish the performance of a blood pressure cuff. The hypothesis is that the blood pressure reading from the cuff will provide similar blood pressure as a radial artery.
This prospective randomized study was designed to compare ultrasound guided technique with Doppler assisted technique for radial arterial cannulation in infant and small children.
The aim of the study is to facilitate radial artery access for cardiac catheterization. The investigators hypothesize that topical nitroglycerin and lidocaine will reduce radial artery spasm. Patients undergoing cardiac catheterization via the radial artery will be randomized to topical nitroglycerin + lidocaine versus placebo.
The radial artery, which is located on the outer side of the forearm, can be used in interventional procedures, such as cardiac catheterization, to provide access to the arterial blood supply. In order to facilitate successful catheterization of the artery, a dilated artery and one free of arterial spasm is desirable. The proposed study will randomize twenty three healthy subjects in 2 visits to determine the effect of topical nitroglycerin on radial artery vasodilation. Radial artery diameter will be measured with ultrasound at regular intervals up to two hours.
Measuring tissue oxygen saturation (St02) in the thenar eminence is emerging as a measurement of resuscitation. However, no study to our knowledge has evaluated the effects of an arterial line in the radial artery supplying this muscle bed on St02. This study will attempt to address the interaction between an arterial line and St02 monitoring in the thenar eminence. As most patients who require aggressive resuscitation will have an arterial line, it is important to understand what if any impact this will have on St02 in the same extremity.
VA patients with coronary artery disease and who have agreed to undergo coronary artery bypass graft surgery would be randomized to receive either radial artery or saphenous vein to the study vessel. The primary outcome variable is graft patency at one year.
In the study group, the TR-Band will be in left in place for 15 minutes before it is gradually deflated by 25% at 15 minute intervals. In the standard of care group, the TR-Band is left in place for 60 minutes before it is gradually deflated by 25% at 15 minute intervals. The aim of the study is to reduce the time the device is in place while minimizing potential complications.
Cardiac catheterization has traditionally been performed via access to the arterial circulation from the femoral artery located in the groin. As an alternative to this approach, the radial artery, located in the arm, is gaining wider use in clinical practice. Multiple studies have demonstrated that cardiac catheterization via the radial approach has a very low complication rate, in the short term. This study is intended to determine if there are any differences in the long term complication rate between radial artery cardiac catheterization as compared with femoral artery cardiac catheterization.
Prospective randomized non-blinded study to determine degree of vessel trauma and adverse remodeling of the proximal forearm radial artery following distal radial artery access (dTRA) for cardiac catheterization compared to standard forearm transradial access (fTRA).
The Safe and Fast Radial Hemostasis using Synergistic Strategies (SAFE \& FAST) trial is an interventional study aimed at reducing the incidence of radial artery occlusion (RAO) rebound bleeding, and the required compression time after transradial approach (TRA) procedures, which have become the default access for coronary procedures globally. The hypothesis is that combining lower-dose heparin and radial hemostasis with simultaneous ipsilateral ulnar artery compression could achieve these improved outcomes.
The goal of this observational study is to find out if researchers can measure oxygen consumption in the body without having to draw blood from lines in arteries and central veins. Participants will undergo measurements of arterial blood oxygen saturation using both finger and neck pulse oximeters.