14 Clinical Trials for Various Conditions
Residual neuromuscular blockade (weakness) is a common occurrence in the postanesthesia care unit when muscle relaxant drugs have been used in the operating room. The only method of reliably detecting the presence of neuromuscular blockade is through the use of quantitative neuromuscular monitors. These devices measure and quantify the degree of muscle weakness and display the results on a screen. When using train-of-four (TOF) nerve stimulation, the ratio of the fourth muscle contraction (twitch) to the first twitch will be displayed; when this ratio is 90% (or 0.9) or greater, full recovery of muscle strength is present, and the endotracheal tube can be removed. At the present time, there is only one commercially-available quantitative monitor available in the United States -the TOF-Watch. It is not used by many clinicians because it requires experience to obtain accurate results, is expensive, and is subject to interference by factors in the operating room. The aim of this investigation is to examine a new quantitative monitor (the T4-EMG (EMG = electromyography) that may not be subject to the same limitations as the TOF-Watch AMG (AMG = acceleromyography). In order to study the accuracy of this new device, the T4-EMG will be compared to the current "clinical gold standard", the TOF-Watch.
Protective airway reflexes may be impaired in the postoperative period, creating the potential for aspiration of gastric contents, even after a patient exhibits appropriate response to command. Because assessment of airway reflex recovery is not possible in an intubated patient, the clinician must make an empiric decision as to when a patient is safe to extubate, and choose a combination of techniques least likely to result in pharyngeal impairment. Adequacy of reversal of neuromuscular block by cholinesterase inhibitors (e.g., neostigmine) is unpredictable, especially in the presence of profound paralysis, and tactile assessment of train-of four and sustained tetanus has shown poor correlation with objective assessments. Protective airway reflexes may also be impaired during early recovery by the anesthetics themselves, even when muscle relaxant has been avoided. In the absence of muscle relaxant the investigators previously demonstrated that patients receiving an anesthetic with higher tissue solubility, sevoflurane showed significantly greater impairment of swallowing up to 14 minutes after response to command compared to patients receiving an anesthetic with lower tissue solubility, desflurane. Therefore, we ask whether the combination of the more soluble anesthetic and the presence of neuromuscular block antagonized by neostigmine may create a multiplicative effect that might further prolong pharyngeal recovery. We plan to randomly assign 100 patients scheduled to undergo surgery with general anesthesia to a standardized anesthetic that includes 1) sevoflurane, rocuronium with 70 µg/kg neostigmine + 14 µg/kg glycopyrrolate antagonism (group S); or 2) desflurane, rocuronium with 70 µg/kg neostigmine + 14 µg/kg glycopyrrolate antagonism (group D). Airway reflex recovery will be judged as adequate by the patient's ability to swallow 20 mL of water without coughing or drooling 5, 10, 15, 20, 30 and 60 minutes after response to command. Anesthetic (sevoflurane or desflurane) will be discontinued after administration of reversal agent and recovery to TOF (train-of-four) ratio of 0.7.
Spine surgery is one of the most common operative procedures in the United States. It is performed in the prone position (a patient laying on belly). Muscle relaxants are given for neuromuscular blockade often referred as paralysis for surgical exposure which is maintained until the patient is returned to the supine position (a patient laying on back) at the end of surgery. At the end of the surgery the paralysis is reversed with a drug (neostigmine). A new drug (sugammadex) has the ability to rapidly reverse the paralysis but it is not well investigated in elderly. This study will investigate speed of recovery and complications of the two reversal drugs in elderly patients (age ≥ 65 years) undergoing posterior spine surgery.
The purpose of this research study is to see the outcome of Sugammadex versus Neostigmine with Glycopyrrolate in colorectal surgery as it relates to its effects on post-surgical time (in hours) to first bowel movement and tolerance for solid food (GI-2 recovery) following bowel resection surgery
This study will compare patient recovery measures after reversal of neuromuscular blockade with neostigmine or sugammadex after surgery. Measures include pulmonary function, muscle strength, time to extubation and quality of recovery in the post anesthesia care unit.
Patients undergoing surgery often receive paralytic agents (or neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs)) to facilitate the procedure. At the end of surgery, the effects NMBAs are reversed with a drug called neostigmine. The use of neostigmine significantly reduces the risk that a patient will be left with muscle weakness in the recovery room. Many anesthesiologists routinely use neostigmine because postoperative muscle weakness may lead to adverse events after surgery. Other anesthesiologists do not routinely administer neostigmine in the operating room because of concerns about potential side effects. Surprisingly, some investigators have reported that neostigmine-induced muscle weakness may occur if the drug is given when the effects of the NMBAs have completely worn off. In contrast, other investigators have not observed this side effect when neostigmine was given at the end of surgery. The aim of this study is to determine whether neostigmine use is associated with muscle weakness when it is given at the time of nearly complete recovery from NMBAs. Muscle strength will be measured using a sensitive monitor (TOF-Watch-SX) and through an examination of the patient for evidence of muscle weakness. Patients will also be evaluated how they recover from anesthesia and surgery.
The train-of-four (TOF) ratio is a quantitative measure used in anesthesia to assess the degree of neuromuscular blockade induced by neuromuscular blocking agents during surgical procedures. Current American Society of Anesthesiologists guidelines recommend monitoring the TOF ratio to guide the administration and reversal of NMBAs, with a target ratio of 0.9 or higher at adductor pollicis muscle indicating adequate reversal and restoration of neuromuscular function. This proposed study aims to observe and compare the TOF ratio between two different muscles of the hand: adductor pollicis and adductor digiti minim using anesthesia monitors on both of their arms during recovery of neuromuscular function. Surgery and anesthesia will occur per standard of care.
The purpose of this research is to determine the time it takes to reverse the effects of the intraoperative medication given to relax the muscles and how this period of recovery correlates with a function of the heart.
Researches are comparing the accuracy of measuring muscle relaxation in the thumb versus the great toe.
The aim of this investigation is to compare the performance of two quantitative monitors utilized on post-anesthesia recovering patients. The ToFscan (Draeger Medical Inc., Telford, PA) represents one of the few standalone acceleromyography (AMG)-based quantitative monitors available for routine clinical use in the United States. The TetraGraph (Senzime AB, Uppsala, Sweden) is a standalone electromyography (EMG)-based quantitative monitor that recently received Conformité Européene (CE) approval. While both of these quantitative monitors can be utilized to guide intraoperative NMBA re-dosing and confirm recovery, they provide their objective data via drastically different techniques.
Residual neuromuscular blockade (weakness) is a common occurrence in the postanesthesia care unit when muscle relaxant drugs have been used in the operating room. The only method of reliably detecting residual neuromuscular blockade is through the use of quantitative neuromuscular monitors. These devices measure and quantify the degree of muscle weakness and display the results on a screen. When using train-of-four (TOF) nerve stimulation, the ratio of the fourth muscle contraction (twitch) to the first twitch will be displayed; when this ratio is 90% (or 0.9) or greater, full recovery of muscle strength is present, and the endotracheal tube can be safely removed. At the present time, there is only one commercially available quantitative monitor produced in the United States -the TOF-Watch. The TOF-Watch is not used by many clinicians because it requires experience to obtain accurate results, is expensive, and is subject to interference by factors in the operating room. The aim of this investigation is to examine a new quantitative monitor (the TetraGraph, an electromyography (EMG) device) in the clinical setting. Patients will be randomized to receive either electromyography monitoring (EMG group-using the TetraGraph) or qualitative peripheral nerve stimulator monitoring (PNS group-the standard type of neuromuscular monitoring used at NorthShore University HealthSystem). The primary endpoint of the investigation is the incidence of postoperative residual blockade (defined as a TOF ratio \< 0.9 with TOF-Watch, the current "gold standard quantitative monitor). Secondary endpoints include a variety of standard clinical recovery variables.
The purpose of this study is to compare two different medications (neostigmine/glycopyrrolate and sugammadex) to see if one drug improves patient comfort regarding the return of muscle strength after surgery.
The proposed work will determine the effect of neuromuscular blockade on physical function and recovery in patients with ARDS. The investigators will conduct a prospective ancillary study at five PETAL clinical centers that will evaluate the neuromuscular structure and function of ROSE (Reevaluation of Systemic Early Neuromuscular Blockade) patients during and after critical illness, including in-person assessments at 6 months after hospital discharge. The investigators hypothesize that patients randomized to NMB will have an increase in ICU-acquired neuromuscular dysfunction during and after critical illness.
Neuromuscular blocking drugs (NMBDs) provide anesthesiologists with powerful intraoperative tools, but their use carries the potential risk of serious postoperative complications. NMBD-induced muscle weakness that lingers into the postoperative period, known as postoperative residual curarization (PORC), is present in as many as 40% of all patients that receive neuromuscular blocking agents. The Post Anesthesia Care Unit will be introducing monitoring as part of standard of care. This study will collect data about patients who receive NMBDs and examine the impact of monitoring on incidences of PORC. Our study is designed to test the following hypotheses: Hypothesis 1: The initiation of quantitative TOF monitoring as part of the standard PACU entry evaluation will change practitioner behavior in a manner that decreases the incidence of PORC in surgical patients at VUMC. Hypothesis 2: The initiation of the routine TOF monitoring program will decrease the incidence of short- and long-term postoperative complications at VUMC.