133 Clinical Trials for Various Conditions
The goal of this interventional study is to compare the efficacy (surgical field quality and intra-operative blood loss) or cost of TIVA alone to general inhalational anesthetics with intravenous TXA in patient participants who are undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery. The main questions the study aims to answer are: * Is the surgical field quality better when using TIVA alone compared to general inhalational anesthetics with intravenous TXA? * Is one method more financially advantageous to the participant and the institution compared to the other method? Participants will be randomized into one of the two anesthesia cohorts prior to sinus surgery. One group will be given total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) alone and the other will be given intravenous tranexamic acid (TXA) followed by general inhalational anesthesia. Researchers will compare the TIVA group to the TXA group to see if one group exhibits a better surgery field viewing quality through a subjective evaluation and measurement of blood loss and also which anesthesia regimen is most cost effective upon conducting a cost analysis.
Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) is a common disorder with serious consequences that remains underrecognized, with \>80% of OSA patients undiagnosed, and undertreated due to inadequate treatment options. The development of additional treatments for OSA, such as pharmacotherapy, are critically needed. The collaboration between Regeneron and Sanofi are funding this project. Regeneron will be providing the drug and the contract will be with Regeneron. Both companies are involved as it is a collaboration across the companies.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether Reslizumab is effective for the treatment of chronic sinusitis.
This is a single-arm extension study to investigate the long-term safety, tolerability, and efficacy of lunsekimig in adult participants with inadequately controlled CRSwNP who have completed a previous lunsekimig CRSwNP clinical study (also referred to as the parent study ACT18207). The study duration will be up to approximately 56 weeks per participant, 52 weeks of treatment period, and 4 weeks of follow-up.
EFC18419 is a multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, Phase 3 study with 3 treatment groups. The purpose of the study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of 2 dosing regimens of itepekimab compared to placebo as add-on therapy to intranasal corticosteroids (INCS) in male and female participants with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) aged 18 years of age and older. Study details include: * The study duration per participant (4-week screening, 52-week treatment, 20-week safety follow-up) will be up to 76 weeks. For participants transitioning to the LTS18420 study, the study duration will be 56 weeks. * The treatment duration will be up to 52 weeks. * The number of visits will be 9 site visits and 20 phone/home visits.
EFC18418 is a multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, Phase 3 study with 3 treatment groups. The purpose of the study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of 2 dosing regimens of itepekimab compared to placebo as add-on therapy to intranasal corticosteroids (INCS) in male and female participants with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) aged 18 years of age and older. Study details include: * The study duration per participant (4-week screening, 52-week treatment, 20-week safety follow-up) will be up to 76 weeks. For participants transitioning to the LTS18420 study, the study duration will be 56 weeks. * The treatment duration will be up to 52 weeks. * The number of visits will be 9 site visits and 20 phone/home visits.
The main objective of this study is to evaluate treatment outcomes of tezepelumab among participants with physician-determined surgery-eligible CRSwNP, with or without asthma. Study details include: 1. The study duration will be up to 40 weeks. 2. The treatment duration will be up to 24 weeks. 3. The visit frequency will be once every 4 weeks (Q4W).
ACT18421 is a multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, Phase 2 study with 3 treatment groups. The purpose of the study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of 2 dosing regimens of itepekimab compared to placebo in male and female participants with chronic rhinosinusitis without nasal polyps (CRSsNP) aged 18 years of age and older. Study details include: * The study duration (4-week screening, 24--week intervention, 20--week safety followup) will be 48 weeks. * The intervention duration will be 24 weeks. * The number of visits will be 7 site visits and 8 phone/remote visits.
This is a parallel, Phase 2, 2-arm, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, proof-of-concept study for treatment of CRSwNP. The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of add-on therapy with subcutaneous lunsekimig in adult participants (aged 18 to 70 years, inclusive) with CRSwNP who are inadequately controlled on intranasal corticosteroid treatment. Participants with and without co-morbid asthma will be included in the study, and lung function will be assessed in both groups. The study duration will be up to approximately 40 weeks per participant, including 4 weeks of screening run-in period, 24 weeks of intervention period, and 12 weeks of follow-up.
The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lebrikizumab in adult participants with chronic rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps treated with intranasal corticosteroids. The study will last about 18 months.
The objectives of this study would be to determine the most effective treatment for children with PCRS and asthma who fail medical management.
The primary purpose of this study is to assess the effect of verekitug (UPB-101) on the endoscopically determined size and extend of nasal polyps in participants with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) and to assess the safety and tolerability of verekitug (UPB-101) compared to placebo.
The primary purpose of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of brensocatib at 10 and 40 milligrams (mg) once daily (QD) compared with placebo in improving clinical symptoms of CRSsNP.
Multicenter, phase III, randomized, blinded, controlled, parallel group.
This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of depemokimab (GSK3511294) in participants with Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP).
This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of depemokimab (GSK3511294) in participants with Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP).
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of rimegepant versus placebo in the acute treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) with and without nasal polyps.
The central hypothesis of this study is that the addition of dupilumab treatment onto standard-of-care intranasal corticosteroids will improve patient-reported measures of disease activity and sense of smell in a cohort of mostly ethnical and racial minority patients with CRSwNP
Multicenter, phase III, randomized, blinded, controlled, parallel group with safety extension phase with crossover or continued treatment.
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and outcomes of Chitodex gel plus Kenalog versus Nexfoam plus Kenalog in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) undergoing sinus surgery. Both dressings are already known to be beneficial in controlling postoperative bleeding and promote wound healing.
This study will assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and efficacy of two LYR-220 designs in symptomatic adult chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) subjects who have had a prior functional endoscopic sinus surgery.
The primary objectives of the study are: * To longitudinally characterize the long-term effectiveness of DUPIXENT® through assessment of patient-reported symptoms, Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) related to Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP) and other type 2 comorbidities, and their change over-time. * To characterize patients who receive DUPIXENT® for CRSwNP in a real-world setting with respect to their medical history, demographic and disease characteristics, and type 2 comorbidities The secondary objectives of the study are: * To characterize real-world utilization of DUPIXENT® for patients with CRSwNP * To collect patient and physician global assessment of disease severity and treatment satisfaction for patients receiving DUPIXENT® for CRSwNP * To collect long-term safety data for patients receiving DUPIXENT® for CRSwNP
A Multicentre, Randomised, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, Placebo-Controlled Phase 3 Efficacy and Safety Study of Tezepelumab in Participants with Severe Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyposis
This study will evaluate the effect of CBP-201, rademikibart, in adult patients with Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps (CRSwNP).
The goal of this study is to examine the mechanism of action of omalizumab in ex vivo tissue culture of whole human nasal polyps from patients with chronic rhino sinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP), such that specific molecular markers of inflammation can be identified.
The overarching objective of this study is to determine the clinical effectiveness of dupilumab for the treatment of CRS that includes several potential disease endotypes with the exclusion of the nasal polyp cluster that has previously been determined. The additional information gained from secondary and exploratory outcomes will help provide important insight for applied research studies and may also provide practical guidance to clinicians on how to select patients for treatment.
The study aims to determine the safety and efficacy of buffered hypertonic (1.8%) saline nasal rinses as compared to isotonic saline nasal rinses in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Evidence from basic science research suggests that hypertonic solutions may have beneficial effects over isotonic saline rinses; however prior clinical studies on this topic have been inconclusive and limited due to highly variable inclusion criteria, large variability in the volume and concentration of irrigation solution, and inconsistent outcome measures. The goal of the study is to utilize a cross over study design to directly compare the impact of two different types of saline irrigation. Primary aim: Compare the efficacy of buffered hypertonic saline irrigations to buffered isotonic saline irrigations on patient reported outcome measures of chronic rhinosinusitis symptoms and nasal obstruction in patients with CRS. Based on in vivo data and prior clinical studies, the investigators expect participants will experience greater symptom improvement with hypertonic saline rinses as compared to isotonic saline irrigations. Hypothesis: Participants will have greater improvement in patient reported outcome measures (SNOT-22 and NOSE) when using buffered hypertonic sinus irrigations as compared to buffered isotonic saline irrigations.
This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, international, multicenter, Phase 3 study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of repeat dosing of benralizumab 30 mg administered subcutaneously (SC) versus placebo in patients with severe nasal polyposis.
This is a 24-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intranasal administration of 186 and 372 μg twice daily (BID) of OPN-375 in subjects with chronic Rhinosinusitis (CRS) without nasal polyps
A Phase 2a, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center study to evaluate the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of GB001 compared with placebo over 16 weeks of treatment in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with or without nasal polyposis (NP).