105 Clinical Trials for Various Conditions
The PQGrass306 (G306) clinical trial is the pivotal Phase III efficacy clinical trial of PQ Grass. The aim of the G306 pivotal clinical trial is to confirm the efficacy and safety of the optimal effective dose of PQ Grass 27600 SU. This will be determined through the measurements of the effect of PQ Grass on the symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR)/rhinoconjunctivitis and the use of relief medications to control these symptoms during the peak grass pollen season (GPS).
The primary objective is to assess the reduction of allergic symptoms as measured by combined symptom and medication score (CSMS) during birch pollen season after a single dose of REGN5713-5714-5715 versus placebo.
Study to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of GSP 301 nasal spray (NS) compared with placebo NS in pediatric subjects (aged 6 to under 12 years) with Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis (SAR).
This is a Prospective, Controlled, Double Blinded, Single Center, Randomized, 3 Arm, Parallel Assignment, Phase 1b/2a Study to assess the safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of B244 delivered as an intranasal spray in healthy volunteers and subjects with seasonal allergic rhinitis.
Study to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of GSP 301 NS compared with placebo NS and individual monotherapy formulations for the treatment of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis (subjects 12 years of age and older)
Study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of GSP 301 NS compared to placebo NS and to individual monotherapies (comparators) as well as the efficacy of these monotherapies (comparators) versus placebo NS over 14 days of study treatment
Dymista, a combined product containing the antihistamine azelastine and the intranasal steroid fluticasone, provides superior clinical efficacy to both fluticasone propionate and azelastine hydrochloride in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis. The superiority of efficacy not only occurs at the initiation of treatment, but persists for its duration. The mechanism underlying the superior efficacy of Dymista is not known. This trial focuses on examining the effects of Dymista on the dynamics of the allergic response in man using nasal provocation with antigen. The investigators will study the relationship between symptoms, physiology, cells and mediators.
Study to evaluate the two different strengths and dose regimen of GSP 301 to be effective in treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.
To compare safety and efficacy of Perrigo's steroid drug product compared with an FDA approved steroid drug product in the treatment of subjects with seasonal allergic rhinitis.
To evaluate the therapeutic equivalence of the lest formulation of Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray, 50 mcg to the marketed formulation NASONEX® (mometasone furoate monohydrate) Nasal Spray, 50 mcg/actuation in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis
We hypothesize that ear acupressure will be effective in treating seasonal allergic rhinitis by changing the immune parameters and the psychological impact factors are associated with ear acupressure treatment outcome.
This phase IV investigational trial is being conducted to evaluate the efficacy of a 2-week treatment of fluticasone propionate nasal spray (FPNS) vs. cetirizine on allergic nasal and ocular symptoms and quality of life in adult subjects with SAR. It is hypothesized that FPNS provides greater nasal symptom relief than cetirizine. The primary measure used to test this hypothesis is the change from baseline over two weeks in reflective total nasal symptom score (rTNSS) compared between FPNS and cetirizine. Approximately 648 subjects will be randomized into a 1:1:1:1 ratio of treatment allocation across approximately twenty-five to thirty-five sites in the US during the 2013 fall allergy season. All subjects will be outpatients. The total duration of study will be approximately 21 days including 7 days of screening period, and 14 days of treatment period.
The purpose of this study is to determine if Dymista nasal spray is better and safer than placebo in treating children ages 4 to \<12 years old who have seasonal allergic rhinitis.
This study will examine dose ranging characteristics of bepotastine besilate nasal spray compared to placebo nasal spray in 600 male or female subjects 12 years of age and older with active seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) and a demonstrated history of allergic sensitivity to Mountain Cedar pollen for at least 2 years prior to the study.
The objectives of this study is to demonstrate bioequivalence (comparable safety and efficacy) of the Test product to the Reference in the treatment of subjects seasonal allergic rhinitis.
This is a clinical study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a bepotastine besilate-corticosteroid combination nasal spray for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) in an open exposure study with subjects who have a demonstrated history of Mountain Cedar pollen allergy. The primary study objective is to assess the reduction from baseline in averaged morning (AM) and evening (PM) values of reflective total nasal symptom scores for each of 3 nasal sprays (bepotastine besilate-fluticasone propionate combination nasal spray, bepotastine besilate nasal spray, fluticasone propionate nasal spray) compared to placebo nasal spray. For enrolled subjects, the study will involve a 7-10 day run-in screening period dosing with placebo nasal spray and then a 14-day treatment period where subjects will dose twice a day with 1 of the 4 test agent nasal sprays and record reflective and instantaneous scores for both nasal and ocular symptoms prior to each dosing.
This study will assess the efficacy and safety of ACT-129968 in adolescent, adult and elderly patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis, due to mountain cedar pollen.
This is a 2-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group, efficacy and safety study of ciclesonide nasal aerosol administered once daily to male and premenarchal female subjects 6 to 11 years-old diagnosed with SAR.
The overall development plan is to show that the combination of tried-and-proven decongestant/antihistamine ingredients (pseudoephedrine hydrochloride and chlorpheniramine maleate), plus a very small amount of belladonna alkaloids (.24 mg atropine sulfate) is a comprehensive, safe and effective B.I.D. drug treatment regimen, indicated for the relief of symptoms associated with seasonal allergic rhinitis in adults and children 12 years of age and older. Treated symptoms include nasal congestion, sneezing, rhinorrhea, itchy nose, itchy/watery eyes, and post nasal drip syndrome \[reduction in tickly cough (acute or chronic), mucus in the back of the throat, sore throat, and hoarseness\]. Considering the favorable safety and efficacy results of Phase 1 and Phase 2, the purpose of Phase 3 is to assess and compare the safety and efficacy of the study drug in a larger group comparatively with a placebo control group. Objectives: A) To report and compare total symptom scores (TSS) by SAR subjects rating the efficacy of STAHIST vs. placebo in relieving nasal congestion, rhinorrhea, nasal itching, sneezing, and post-nasal drip over the two-week study period. B) Report any side effects or adverse drug reactions and rate the severity of any incident. C) Compare and report each symptom score, total nasal symptom scores (TNSS), and post-nasal drip symptom scores (PND-S) between the two study arms.
This study compared the safety and efficacy of a generic fluticasone furoate (Lek Pharmaceuticals) nasal spray to the reference listed drug in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis. Additionally both the test and the reference formulations were tested for superiority against a placebo nasal spray.
This is an efficacy study of bepotastine besilate nasal spray in seasonal allergic rhinitis.
This study will assess the efficacy and safety of different doses of ACT-129968 in adult patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis, due to mountain cedar pollen.
To report and compare total symptom scores, nasal symptom scores, post-nasal drip symptom scores, and adverse reactions in and between SAR subjects on active drug and SAR subjects on placebo.
After a nasal allergen challenge it should be possible to measure markers of inflammation that may be useful to assess the properties of future drugs. If these markers are reproducible and impacted by the study drugs they could be useful for future drug development.
This study compared the efficacy and safety of a generic mometasone nasal spray to the reference listed drug in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis. Additionally both the test and the reference formulations were tested for superiority against a placebo nasal spray.
The purpose of the study is to assess the efficacy and safety of an investigational nasal aerosol compared with placebo nasal aerosol in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.
This clinical research study will evaluate the safety and effectiveness of two doses of an investigational medication (ciclesonide nasal aerosol) for the treatment of subjects with of seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR). The study will consist of a Screening Period to confirm study eligibility, followed by a Single-Blind Placebo Run-in period to acclimate subjects to the proper use of the study medication and to assess the subject's severity of SAR symptoms, followed by a 2-week double-blind treatment period to assess the safety and effectiveness of the study medication when given to eligible subjects.
Objectives: A) To gather pharmacodynamic measurements and assess blood levels of the active ingredients in AHIST over the dosage interval period of 12 hours. Hypothesis: Hysteresis curves plotting each active ingredient's blood levels over a 12-hour dosage interval will substantiate S5 Symptom Diary scores (IE: evidentiary therapeutic window data); B) To report subjective scores by subjects rating the efficacy of a single dose AHIST in relieving nasal congestion, rhinorrhea, nasal itching, sneezing, and post-nasal drip over a 12-hour dosage interval. Hypothesis: Greater than 66% of subjects will document clinically significant relief over a 12-hour period from one dose of AHIST; C) Report any side effects or adverse drug reactions and rate the severity of any incidence. Hypothesis: Not more than one patient will have an adverse event significant enough to warrant withdrawal; side effects will be mild with the most frequently reported side effect occurring in less than 10% of patients-drowsiness.
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel-group study, comparing the bioequivalence of triamcinolone acetonide aqueous nasal spray (Apotex, Inc.) to that of Nasacort® AQ nasal spray (Sanofi-Aventis Pharmaceutical Products, Inc.) in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.
MAGNA intends to show that the combination of pseudoephedrine, chlorpheniramine, plus a small amount of belladonna alkaloid is a comprehensive, safe and effective twice daily (BID) drug treatment for seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) patients with post-nasal drip (PND). The phase 1 single-dose trial will consist of 21 subjects: 1) to gather pharmacodynamic measurements and blood levels of active ingredients over 12 hours; 2) To report subjective scores by subjects rating efficacy of single dose of STAHIST; 3) To report any side effects or adverse drug reactions and rate the severity of incidence.