26 Clinical Trials for Various Conditions
Evaluation of the effectiveness of a sunscreen product by determining its Sun Protection Factor (SPF) on the skin of human subjects.
Evaluation of the effectiveness of a sunscreen product by determining its Sun Protection Factor (SPF) on the skin of human subjects.
Evaluation of the effectiveness of a sunscreen product by determining its Sun Protection Factor (SPF) on the skin of human subjects.
The objective of this study was to compare the human eye stinging potential of experimental formulas and an industry standard shampoo mixture. The study was conducted under the supervision of a Board Certified Ophthalmologist.
The objective of this study was to compare the human eye stinging potential of experimental formulas and an industry standard shampoo mixture. The study was conducted under the supervision of a Board Certified Ophthalmologist. The study design was a three cell, single blind study. Subjects were given the industry standard shampoo mixture in one eye and an exploratory sunscreen in the other as according to the randomization schedule.
The objective of this study was to compare the human eye stinging potential of experimental formulas and an industry standard shampoo mixture. The study was conducted under the supervision of a Board Certified Ophthalmologist.
Evaluation of the effectiveness of a sunscreen product by determining its Sun Protection Factor (SPF) on the skin of human subjects.
Evaluation of the effectiveness of a sunscreen product by determining its Sun Protection Factor (SPF) on the skin of human subjects.
The objective of this study was to assess the safety and appropriateness of a sunscreen product for use on sport users, under supervised outdoor-use conditions. The study was conducted under the supervision of a Board-Certified Dermatologist at an outdoor, chlorinated swimming pool facility.
The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the potential for phototoxicity of the sun care products SPF 50 Y65 110, SPF 50 Y51 002, and SPF 15 V27 104 compared to that of a negative control (0.9% sodium chloride \[NaCl\]) after a single 24 h application of test materials followed by irradiation with ultraviolet A (UVA) and ultraviolet B (UVB). The secondary objective of this study was to evaluate the safety of the sun care products SPF 50 Y65 110, SPF 50 Y51 002, and SPF 15 V27 104 combined with UVA/B irradiation by monitoring adverse events (AEs) throughout the study.
The purpose of this study is to determine if using an electronic reminder improves adherence to sunscreen use. The specific study aims are as follows: 1. To determine whether the use of electronic reminder system increases adherence to topical agents. 2. To assess technological feasibility of measuring adherence to topical agents using electronic monitors specially designed for tubes. 3. To assess technological feasibility of providing electronic reminders using cellular phone text-messaging system. 4. To obtain subjects' feedback on the adherence monitoring and reminder system.
This study will evaluate the use of publicly available free sunscreen dispensers at Maine beaches and Boston and Cambridge parks. Aim 1: Determine the impact of DFS+ (dispensers, flyers, enhanced signage, + a social media component delivered by teen ambassadors) sun protection education on the use of free sunscreen dispensers by adolescents ages 12-20 compared with DFS (dispensers, flyers, standard signage). Aim 2: Outcomes evaluation to assess the effects of the sunscreen dispensers and the sun-safety educational intervention on sun protection knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors within the community. Aim 3: Cost Evaluation and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
The purpose of this study is to determine the 80-Minute Water Resistant SPF of three sunscreen products (ChapStick Active Performance \[CAP\] UnScented, CAP Herbal Mint Flavour and CAP Mountain Berry Flavour) using the methodology described in the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Final Rule (2011).
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the 8-hour moisturization efficacy of OTC sunscreen lip balm after a single treatment application.
The purpose of this study is to determine the static SPF of three sunscreen products (ChapStick Active Performance \[CAP\] UnScented, CAP Herbal Mint and CAP Mountain Berry) using the methodology described in the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Final Rule (2011).
The purpose of this study is to determine the static SPF of three sunscreen products (ChapStick Lip Moisturizer \[CLM\] Original, CLM Mint Flavour and CLM Black Cherry Flavour) using the methodology described in the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Final Rule (2011).
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the 8-hour moisturization efficacy of OTC sunscreen lip balm after a single treatment application.
The aim of this study is to determine the SPF of two test materials ChapStick Moisturizer, Classic Flavor and ChapStick Moisturizer, Strawberry Flavor using the methodology described in the International Standard Test Method. This static methodology also meets the requirements of the Australia/New Zealand standard.
To explore and quantify potential issues with application of a gel sunscreen in Outdoor Use testing, in a controlled indoor environment
To visually evaluate the retention of coverage of the Test Product(s) (TP) on the face after exercise compared to the full coverage observed prior to exercise
To assess the safety of a sunscreen product under supervised outdoor-use conditions
Evaluation of the human eye irritation potential of a test sunscreen formulation.
To visually evaluate the retention of coverage of the Test Product(s) (TP) on the face after exercise compared to the full coverage observed prior to exercise.
To assess the safety of a sunscreen product under supervised outdoor-use conditions with the target consumer
The objective of this study was to assess the safety and appropriateness of a sunscreen product for use on sport users, under supervised outdoor use conditions.
To assess the safety of a sunscreen product when used outdoor.