17 Clinical Trials for Various Conditions
Our goal is to compare the difference in surgical outcomes and patient satisfaction for surgical scars on the face between suture removal at 1 week versus 2 weeks. There is variation in the timing at which Mohs surgeons remove sutures on the face. Some prefer 1 week, and others prefer 2 weeks. This has not been formally studied. It is possible the outcomes are the same between both groups, or that one has a better cosmetic outcome than the other. Your skin cancer will be removed as usual. After this, your wound will be sutured in the usual fashion, except the top sutures will be divided into two separate halves. You will return at 1 week for one half of the top sutures to be removed, and at 2 weeks for the other half to be removed. Which half is removed first will be determined at random at your 1 week visit. At two months, you will return for standardized photographs which will be used by physicians to rate the cosmetic outcomes of the wound halves based on a standardized scale. Most likely, there will be no difference between the wound halves at 2 months and the study is complete. There is a small chance that there will be a cosmetic difference seen at 2 months, in which case you will return at 1 year for repeat standardized photographs and ratings. All data and photographs will be kept secure and any identifying information will be destroyed at the end of the study.
The investigators wish to determine how suture spacing (5 mm vs. 10 mm) affects cosmetic outcome and development of "train tracking" in wounds. Linear wounds with sutures spaced closer together may not be as cosmetically appealing when compared to those that have larger spacing between sutures. Suturing closer together constricts blood flow and increases tension that ultimately results in more tissue necrosis and a less appealing outcome. The investigators also aim to conclude if 5 mm or 10 mm suture spacing results in less complications.
The study aims to compare outcomes in patient comfort, cosmetic appearance, and complication rates between sutures and staples in high tension areas for closures of skin cancers excised in a dermatology clinic.
This study will investigate whether adding a vessel loop under sutures after elective carpal tunnel release increases patient satisfaction with suture removal.
The proposed project aims to evaluate the safety of DuraMesh™ suture for laparotomy closure in an emergent setting, while also providing preliminary efficacy data with regard to incisional hernia prevention. Conventional techniques for laparotomy closure in the setting of an emergency laparotomy or delayed abdominal closure suffer from a lack of durability, with incisional hernia rates of 30-34% reported. While prophylactic planar mesh placement has emerged as a cost-effective strategy to prevent hernia formation in the clean, elective laparotomy setting, higher rates of surgical site complications and increased technical complexity preclude its use in the emergency or contaminated setting. Utilized exactly like conventional suture without any change in surgical closure technique, DuraMesh™ provides the durability of planar mesh reinforcement without the marked increase in foreign material or added surgical complexity. As a result, DuraMesh™ is the only hernia prevention strategy that can be forward-deployed in support of the injured warfighter. While this study is specifically targeted to a gap in the care of the injured warfighter, the potential benefits extend well beyond the military applications. With over 2 million laparotomies performed annually in the United States, and approximately 20% of these resulting in an incisional hernia, the need for an alternative abdominal wall closure strategy is equally dire in the civilian setting. This clinical trial represents an opportunity to drive the needed paradigm shift towards prevention, rather than costly management of incisional hernias. The investigators anticipate this work will rapidly lead to further research, including providing the preliminary data necessary to launch a multi-center randomized controlled trial to assess the clinical efficacy of DuraMesh™ for hernia prevention in both the emergent and elective operative settings.
Researchers are trying to determine which suturing pattern for esophageal stent placement is more effective in a randomized fashion as currently what suturing pattern to use is an arbitrary decision.
Sacrospinous ligament suspension (SSLS) was first described in 1958. It is commonly performed for correction of apical prolapse. A combination of delayed absorbable and/or permanent sutures are commonly used for the procedure. When permanent sutures are used, risk of suture-related complications is present and patients may require suture removal. In available literature, there is limited data comparing the efficacy and suture-related complications when using different types of sutures. A previous randomized controlled trial demonstrated that using an absorbable suture is equally efficacious as delayed absorbable sutures in SSLS. However, there is no comparison to absorbable versus permanent suture. Our aim is to compare the absorbable suture versus permanent suture for treating pelvic organ prolapse and to compare suture-related complications. Our primary outcome is comparing POPQ point C at 12 month follow up for absorbable vs permanent suture. Participants will be randomized 1:1 to absorbable or permanent suture. Follow up will occur at 2-4 weeks, 12 weeks and 12 months after the surgery.
This study investigates the effect of materials used in subcuticular suture on patients' outcomes after surgery. The prevention of surgical site wound infection is important to decrease the length of hospital stay and the post-operative risk of incisional hernia, especially in patients undergoing open hepatectomy (surgical removal of the liver). The purpose of this study is to compare the impact of the use of Quill versus Monocryl for subcuticular suture on patients' outcomes after surgery.
Suture-mediated closure devices are effective and safe for achieving rapid hemostasis in femoral venous access site and reducing the incidence of complications associated with traditional closure methods. Furthermore, there are predictive factors(such as sheath size, obesity, procedure duration, and anticoagulation status)that we can use to assess the procedure's likelihood of success in various patients.
This is a randomized controlled trial comparing groin closure after vascular intervention with Vicryl suture versus PDS (polydioxanone) suture. This will be a single center trail performed at CCF main campus. Patients will be enrolled in a prospective fashion and will be randomized 1:1 to either PDS or Vicryl closure. Patients undergoing bilateral groin exposure will be randomized to receive both closure types to either groin.
Prior investigators have evaluated the use of 2-octyl cyanoacrylate (glue) as a method to secure a variety of venous catheters including central/peripheral lines. There is a paucity of research evaluating the use of glue for arterial catheters. The investigators conducted a pilot study to test the null hypothesis that there would be no difference in failure rates between radial arterial lines (r-a-line) secured with glue vs. suture.
Abdominal closure with antibacterial-coated sutures has been shown to reduce wound infections after a number of surgical procedures, but none of the previous trials included cesarean delivery. Our objective is to determine whether use of antibacterial-coated sutures reduces surgical site infection (SSI) after cesarean delivery.
Retrospective chart review evaluating different suture types on surgical outcomes for cesarean delivery and vaginal birth after cesarean delivery outcomes when different sutures are used.
A comparison of the type of suture used for cesarean skin incision approximation and the subsequent rate of wound complications has not been widely studied. Investigators seek to compare poliglecaprone 25 and polyglactin 910 suture used in a subcuticular skin closure in Pfannenstiel incisions during cesarean birth and determine the subsequent wound complication rates (SSI, hematoma, seroma, wound separation).
Women with gynecologic cancers are often obese and have other risk factors for post-operative wound separation. Data from obstetrics and orthopedic surgery literature have shown a decreased risk of wound separation and complications when the skin is closed with suture as compared to staples. Skin closure with either staples or suture is considered standard of care. Traditionally, most wounds have been closed with staples given their ease of use and quick application. In this randomized study the investigators plan to evaluate and compare the complication rate associated with both standard closures.
This is a randomized prospective clinical trial designed to determine the wound complication rates for stainless steel staples versus subcuticular suture for skin closure in the obese parturient (BMI≥ 30kg/m2) undergoing cesarean delivery.
To determine whether the rate of wound complications differs based on method of closure of skin incision (staples vs. suture) after cesarean delivery.