17 Clinical Trials for Various Conditions
The goal of this Registry Study is to capture clinical pregnancy outcomes and fibroid treatment background data for any subject post-Exablate treatment for their symptomatic fibroids.
To determine the safety of extended treatment with Proellex® in women who have successfully completed either study ZPV-201 \[NCT02323646\] or ZPU-203 \[NCT02301897\] and meet eligibility criteria.
The primary objective of this study is to determine the safety and efficacy of two oral doses of Proellex administered for up to 2 courses of treatment (18 weeks each), each separated by an Off-Drug Interval (ODI), to premenopausal women with symptomatic uterine fibroids.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and ablation efficacy of the ExAblate UF V2 System when treating symptomatic uterine fibroids. The ExAblate System is a medical device that involves a focused ultrasound system and an MRI scanner. ExAblate delivers a pulse of focused ultrasound energy, or sonication, to the targeted tissue. In this particular study, the targeted tissue is uterine fibroids. Each sonication is used to heat small spots in the fibroid much like a magnifying glass can be used to focus light to heat a spot. The heat created kills a portion of the fibroid with the goal of decreasing or eliminating uterine fibroid-related symptoms. Repeated sonications are performed until the entire fibroid is treated or the treated volume is determined to be appropriate. The ExAblate system is commercially approved in the United States to treat symptomatic uterine fibroids. The ExAblate UF V2 System is an experimental device and is being investigated in this study. While similar to the commercial system, the ExAblate UF V2 device includes the following major changes, among others, which are intended to improve device performance and safety: * Up and down movement of the ultrasound transducer, in an attempt to improve fibroid treatment by moving the ultrasound focal point within the targeted fibroid. * Ultrasound energy can be turned off for a specific area in an attempt to minimize amount of energy passing through sensitive areas of the body.
Safety and efficacy study of 25 and 50 mg doses of Proellex
Two (2) dose levels of Proellex or placebo will be administered once-daily for up to 91 days. Following screening and a pre-treatment endometrial biopsy, subjects will be followed monthly for the three month treatment phase.
The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) using the Halt System for the treatment of patients with symptomatic uterine fibroids.
Premenopausal women with symptomatic uterine fibroids will be randomized to either Proellex 25mg or 50mg or placebo for one treatment cycle (four months). Safety and effectiveness between 50 mg versus placebo, and between 25mg and placebo will be analyzed.
Premenopausal women with symptomatic uterine fibroids will be randomized to either Proellex 25mg or 50mg or placebo for one treatment cycle (four months). Safety and effectiveness between 50 mg versus placebo, and between 25mg and placebo will be analyzed.
Eligible female subjects will be randomly assigned to one of the three treatment groups. Subjects will receive 325 mg (65 mg elemental iron) iron supplements to be taken twice daily during study drug treatment. The study duration is approximately six months, which is comprised of a 4 - 6 week screening period, a three-month drug treatment period, and a one-month follow-up period.
PK of 25 mg and 50 mg Proellex® administered once daily (QD) over a 4-month period.
The purpose of this study is to demonstrate comparability between Contour SE™ Microspheres and Embosphere® Microspheres for achieving post UFE fibroid devascularization in women with symptomatic uterine fibroids.
The uterine fibroid embolization (UFE) procedure is a treatment option for abnormal heavy menstrual bleeding and/or bulk symptoms associated with uterine fibroids and adenomyosis. Post UFE procedural pain and nausea are expected events. These symptoms are treated with current standard of care medications, including opiates. Intra procedure pain medications include midazolam, fentanyl and hydromorphone. Some centers include nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications (NSAIDS), including oral ibuprofen and IV ketorolac. Post procedural pain control is centered on a hydromorphone patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) infusion pump, as well as a NSAID regimen. Intra procedure and post procedure nausea control medications include a transcutaneous scopolamine patch and IV anti-nausea medications such as ondansetron and prochlorperazine. This study is being conducted to compare two new medications for pain, IV ibuprofen and IV acetaminophen, administered for 24 hours following UFE. The primary safety objective of non-inferiority will be met and the primary efficacy objective of superiority, decreased pain and nausea, will be accessed when compared to current standard of care regimens. This is a 4 arm, double blind, randomized, controlled study. All patients will receive standard of care baseline pain medications, including IV midazolam, fentanyl and hydromorphone intra procedure, followed by a hydromorphone PCA infusion pump post procedure. The 4 arms will include: \[ Arm 1\] IV ibuprofen/IV placebo, \[Arm 2\] IV acetaminophen/IV placebo, \[Arm 3\] IV ibuprofen/IV acetaminophen, and \[arm 4\] IV placebo/IV placebo. These medications will be given during the procedure and extended over a 24 hour stay. Arm 4 (IV placebo/IV placebo) would replicate current standard of care, and therefore will include IV push (IVP) ketorolac, which would be given at the end of the procedure and be continued every 6 hours for the 24 hour stay. An IVP of saline will be given as a control every 6 hours for the 24 hour stay to arms 1, 2 and 3. Pain and nausea will be measured at intervals prior to the procedure, throughout the stay and at 2 weeks post procedure.
This Post Market study is being conducted to compare the direct and indirect cost of three approaches (GFA, myomectomy, and uterine artery embolization) for the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids. In addition, data from this study is being used to satisfy the requirements of the United States Food and Drug Administration's 522 (post market surveillance) order.
The primary goal of this study is to compare the safety and effectiveness of two standard fibroid treatments: MRI guided ultrasound surgery (MRgFUS) and uterine artery embolization (UAE). Both treatments are approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for women who do not plan to become pregnant. A second goal of this study is to better understand which symptoms bother women with fibroids the most. Understanding and addressing the symptoms of clinically-significant uterine fibroids is important in order to optimize treatment outcomes and control health care costs. Women who are eligible to participate in the study, are randomized to one of two treatment arms (UAE or MRgFUS). Women in both arms will receive treatment but will not be able to choose which treatment she will receive. A comprehensive assessment of symptoms-including experienced pain- will take place at baseline, 6 weeks, and at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months following treatment with UAE and MRgFUS.
The purpose of this study is to gain additional information regarding use of Magnetic Resonance Elastography (MRE) for uterine fibroid characterization. In this study, the investigators will use a new noninvasive technology, MRE, to further characterize the elastic properties of the uterine fibroids. To date, very little is known concerning how the tissue composition of the uterine fibroid may affect its treatment with Magnetic Resonance Guided Focused Ultrasound (MRgFUS). In this study, the investigators will use a new noninvasive technology, magnetic resonance elastography (MRE), to further characterize the elastic properties of the uterine fibroids. This information will be gathered during routine magnetic resonance imaging for symptomatic uterine fibroids. It is known that some fibroids with increased T2-signal on Magnetic Resonance Imaging(MRI) can be more difficult to treat. This information will be gathered during routine magnetic resonance imaging for symptomatic uterine fibroids.
The objective of this Phase IV study is to evaluate the safety of the ExAblate treatment of uterine fibroids using the enhanced sonication techniques, based on the current commercially-approved treatment guidelines. Treatment may include up to 100% of individual fibroid volume, within established serosal and sacral treatment margins. The Enhanced sonication is one of the various sonication modes that may lead to increased thermal dose volume of each sonication without additional safety risks. This is an additional treatment tool available in the ExAblate system for the treatment of uterine fibroids. The safety profile of the Enhanced Sonication was investigated under an FDA-regulated IDE study. FDA granted approval of Enhanced Sonication with the requirement to perform a post-approval study to collect additional safety data when treating up to 100% of individual fibroid volume.