7 Clinical Trials for Various Conditions
This mechanistic study uses an anti anxiety drug and brain imaging to study the threat processing system and associated brain circuits in people with depression, anxiety disorders and comorbid depression and anxiety disorders. In a double blind, placebo controlled crossover design, up to 65 individuals will be recruited who will have a diagnosis of major depressive disorder (MDD) and at least one anxiety disorder (AD) (AD-MDD group), up to 65 participants will have a diagnosis of MDD and no diagnosis of an AD and up to 65 participants will have no diagnosis of MDD and a diagnosis of at least one AD will be enrolled to participate in an two session study to obtain 150 completers (50 per group). All participants will receive a single dose of Lorazepam and placebo (order randomized) taken orally. After the \~2.5 hr screening session, participants will complete two identical \~5 hr experimental sessions, each of which include a 30 min eyeblink startle session and a 1.5 hr functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain scan session. The total time involved in the study is approximately 10.5 hours. The main questions the study seeks to answer are: * are people with comorbid depression and anxiety different than those with depression alone in terms of their eyeblink startle response to threat? * are people with comorbid depression and anxiety different than those with depression alone in terms of their brain activation in response to threat? * are people with comorbid depression and anxiety different than those with depression alone in terms of their responses to anxiety drugs?
The goal of this double-blind clinical trial is to further explore if, how, and for whom orexin antagonism modifies brain-behavior stress targets in moderate to severe alcohol use disorder (AUD). The main questions it aims to answer are: * Does an acute dose of suvorexant (SUV) and/or daily use of SUV modify brain-behavior targets of AUD dysfunction? * Does daily SUV use change alcohol behavior and if so, is this change in behavior linked to brain-behavior change? Participants will be randomized to a treatment group (SUV or placebo) and protocol arm, electromyography (EMG) only or EMG+functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Participants will be asked to complete the following: * Baseline lab visit(s) that include the psychophysiological stress paradigm (EMG only or EMG+fMRI, dependent upon randomization). * Acute drug challenge where the participant will return to the lab to repeat the stress paradigm following administration of a single dose of either 10mg SUV or placebo. * Medication trial where participants will be instructed to take 10mg capsules of SUV or placebo orally each night before bedtime for 4-weeks. * Daily reports of medication adherence, side-effects, sleep, alcohol use, and mood will be collected via smartphones during the 4-week medication trial. * Post-treatment lab visit(s) where participants will return to the lab at the end of the medication trial and complete the same stress paradigm from baseline (EMG only or EMG+fMRI, dependent upon randomization).
Over 50% of patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) do not respond to initial treatment and relapse is common. In particular, comorbid depression and anxiety disorders are associated with more treatment resistance. Thus, there is a great need for novel, more targeted treatments. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a novel intervention that can be used to causally target neural excitability and plasticity in brain regions/circuits implicated in regulating mood and anxiety and emerging evidence suggests that it reduces threat sensitivity. Here the investigators propose to use tDCS to target threat sensitivity as a core symptom of anxious depression to determine if the investigators can engage the neural circuits that are treatment targets. Following the administration of a single dose of anxiolytic or antidepressant treatment, early changes in emotional processing have been observed in healthy people and clinical groups. Among patients, acute cognitive effects - such as a reduction in threat sensitivity - have been shown to predict response to drug and behavioral treatments. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies have confirmed hyperactive amygdala and/or hypoactive prefrontal activity in patients, indicating an imbalance of activity within this cortico-limbic circuit that sub-serves threat identification (amygdala) and top-down control (prefrontal). Specifically, treatments aiming to remediate prefrontal/ amygdala dysfunction could be a critical target in patients exhibiting these deficits. Several clinical trials have shown that administration of frontal cortex tDCS is a potentially effective treatment for MDD. However, underlying mechanisms of action are unclear. To meet this gap, the investigators propose an experimental medicine study (target identification and initial target engagement paths) where 141 volunteers with anxious MDD will be randomized to receive a single session of active or sham tDCS in a parallel design. Threat sensitivity will be measured using task and resting state fMRI and potentiated startle electrophysiology. Preliminary data suggest reductions in behavioral threat sensitivity from a single session of frontal tDCS. This was followed up with an fMRI study which found that a single session of active vs sham frontal tDCS reduced amygdala response to fearful faces whilst simultaneously increasing frontal attentional control signals. This provides evidence that modulating activity in the frontal cortex inhibits amygdala response to threat, highlighting a potential neural mechanism for the behavioral reduction in threat sensitivity. In addition, this offers initial mechanistic insights into the efficacy of tDCS in clinical trials for the treatment of MDD and anxiety disorders, suggesting that threat sensitivity may be a suitable cognitive target. The current proposal builds on this to establish acute effects of frontal tDCS on amygdala response to threat (primary aim), frontoparietal response to threat (secondary aim), startle response under threat (secondary aim) and approach-avoidance-conflict (exploratory aim). The ultimate aim is to apply these multi-level acute findings to mechanistic clinical trials of tDCS, to test their prediction of treatment response (full model path) and improve patient outcomes.
The overall goals of this study are to examine the relationship between chronic inflammation and threat and reward sensitivity, and to determine the effects of acute inflammation on threat sensitivity, in individuals with and without moderate to severe PTSD symptoms. The investigators will first conduct an observational study to examine the relationship between chronic inflammation and neural and behavioral measures of threat sensitivity. Then, the investigators will conduct a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, between-subjects study to examine the effects of acute inflammation on neural and behavioral measures of threat sensitivity.
The goal of this study is to understand whether race-related stress can impact the way people direct their attention and what interventions may be helpful for attention.
This study is a pilot study to examine the effects of acute inflammation on cognition and emotion in healthy participants using a between-subjects, randomized, double-blind design.
The current study will test the causal relationship between elevated levels of cortisol and the serotonin transporter gene (5-HTTLPR) as these factors influence sensitivity to environmental threat. The investigators predict that carriers of the short allele of the serotonin transporter gene who have elevated cortisol levels will be most sensitive to threatening environments, whereas carriers of the long allele who do not have elevated cortisol (placebo subjects) will be least sensitive.