36 Clinical Trials for Various Conditions
Managing complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs) poses significant challenges, often resulting in the over-prescription of empiric antibiotics. This approach exposes patients to multiple antimicrobials and raises the risk of inadequate treatment efficacy. The purpose of this study is to assess and compare the clinical utility of molecular testing (PCR) versus conventional culture and sensitivity (C\&S) in managing cUTI, to identify optimal management strategies for cUTI patients. This was a multi-center (6 sites in the united states), randomized, parallel, investigator-blinded, clinical trial to assess the clinical utility of PCR by comparing the diagnostic and therapeutic outcomes of PCR diagnostic methods to those of conventional C\&S in managing cUTIs in adults. All patients who met all the inclusion criteria and non of the exclusion criteria and signed an informed consent form were enrolled and randomized to one of two testing protocols used to guide treatment (PCR guided Arm, and C\&S guided Arm). Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio based on their unique sequential randomization numbers assigned at enrollment. Urine samples were collected from all patients and tested using both PCR and C\&S methods before randomization; however, investigators remained blinded to the comparator test results throughout the trial. To ensure unbiased treatment decisions, clinicians were blinded to the comparator test results. Treatment was prescribed solely based on the assigned test-PCR results for the PCR arm and C\&S results for the C\&S arm. The comparator test results remained blinded until the end of the study (EOS) Urine specimens were collected using a clean-catch midstream technique at two distinct time points-at baseline visit/before randomization (Day1) and at EOS visit (Day 28)-following targeted therapy based on the assigned diagnostic arm. Collected samples were immediately stored at 2-8 ◦C until analysis to preserve sample integrity. Upon receipt, urine samples were aliquoted for parallel testing, with one portion analyzed using PCR (QuantStudio 7 or 12 and KingFisher) and the other processed using C\&S methodologies. Molecular testing (Doc Lab UTM 2.0) involved qualitative PCR amplification targeting 28 uropathogen species and 16 classes of antibiotic resistance genes, covering both bacterial and fungal pathogens. All urine samples for urine C\&S were shipped to the central laboratory. The urine culture, isolation of uropathogen(s), initial identification of pathogen(s), and bacterial counts in urine were conducted in the central laboratory. The urine samples were cultured and quantified using a calibrated loop to identify a quantitative count of bacteria at a lower limit of 10\^5 CFU/mL. All purified pathogen(s) were further analyzed for species identification and antimicrobial sensitivity The primary endpoint was the number (and percentage) of subjects in each study arm with favorable clinical outcomes (FCl) at the EOS visit. The FCl was defined as a patient's clinical response, assessed by the treating investigator, indicating either clinical improvement or cure. Clinical improvement was defined as the resolution of at least one symptom of cUTI present at baseline, absence of new cUTI symptoms, and/or avoidance of parenteral antibiotic therapy following randomization. Clinical cure was defined as the complete resolution of all acute signs and symptoms of cUTI present at baseline, to the extent that no further antimicrobial therapy (either IV or oral) was required for the treatment of the cUTI. The secondary endpoint included several assessments: * Number (and percentage) of subjects with microbiological eradication at the EOS, defined as achieving a quantitative urine culture at the EOS indicating a reduction of all uro-pathogens present at baseline to \<10\^5 colony forming unit per milliliter (CFU/mL) and the absence of baseline pathogens detected by EOS urine PCR (Cq \> 33); * Subjective measurement of treating investigator satisfaction score through a questionnaire at EOS, evaluated factors such as the ease of interpreting the test result, its availability, and its usefulness in clinical decision-making and patient management compared to the comparator; * Comparison of turnaround time between molecular diagnostic procedures and conventional diagnostic * Overall agreeability between the diagnostic results generated by PCR versus C\&S as assessed by discordant analysis * Assessment of the favorable clinical outcome of patients with discordant results \[PCR(+), CS(-) and PCR(-), CS(+)\]
A multi-center, retrospective study of cases of serious bacterial infections including complicated Urinary Tract Infection (cUTI) or Acute Pyelonephritis (AP), Hospital Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia (HABP), Ventilator Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia (VABP), and/or bacteremia caused by Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE)
Vabomere™, (meropenem-vaborbactam) is being compared to the Best Available Therapy in the treatment of adults with selected serious infections due to Carbapenem Resistant Enterobacteriaceae
Meropenem-vaborbactam is being compared to piperacillin-tazobactam in the treatment of adults with complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI) or acute pyelonephritis (AP).
The purpose of the study is to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of ZTI-01 (IV fosfomycin) as non-inferior to piperacillin/tazobactam in overall success (clinical cure and microbiologic eradication) for the treatment of hospitalized patients with complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI) or acute pyelonephritis (AP).
The primary objective of the study is to assess the safety and tolerability of meropenem-vaborbactam administered by intravenous (IV) infusion in children 3 months and above to less than 12 years with complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI), including acute pyelonephritis (AP)
The primary purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of oral TBP-PI-HBr as compared with intravenous (IV) imipenem-cilastatin with respect to the overall response (combined clinical cure plus microbiological eradication) at the Test-of-Cure (TOC) visit in hospitalized adult participants (≥18 years of age) with cUTI or AP.
This is a Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, multicenter, non-inferiority study to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of FEP-ZID vs. meropenem in the treatment of hospitalized adults with cUTI or AP. Approximately 528 hospitalized adult subjects (≥ 18 years of age) diagnosed with cUTI or AP will be enrolled in the study. The diagnosis of cUTI or AP will be based on a combination of clinical symptoms and signs plus the presence of pyuria. The total duration of treatment with study drug is 7 to 10 days. Each subject must remain hospitalized during the study drug treatment period; no outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy is allowed.
This study will assess the safety and efficacy of cefepime/VNRX-5133 compared with meropenem in both eradication of bacteria and in symptomatic response in patients with cUTIs.
The key purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of tebipenem pivoxil hydrobromide (TBPM-PI-HBr) compared to intravenous (IV) ertapenem, in participants with complicated Urinary Tract Infection (cUTI) or Acute Pyelonephritis (AP).
Multi-center, randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority study of cefepime 2 g/AAI101 500 mg combination compared to piperacillin 4 g/tazobactam 500 mg in a population of adult patients with cUTI or AP. The study will be conducted in approximately 115 sites located in the EU, the US, Central, South America and South Africa.
The purpose of the study is to evaluate whether LYS228 can be developed for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections
This study aims to evaluate the safety and tolerability of MK-7625A (ceftolozane/tazobactam) compared with that of meropenem in pediatric participants with cUTI, including pyelonephritis.
This is a non-randomized, open-label, one-treatment, one group study in participants with complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI) including pyelonephritis to characterize the pharmacokinetics of RO7079901 co-administered with meropenem.
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of eravacycline compared to ertapenem in treating participants with complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI).
This study will assess the safety, tolerability and efficacy of ceftazidime and avibactam (CAZ-AVI )versus cefepime in children from 3 months to less than 18 years old with complicated urinary tract infections.
This is a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter, prospective study to assess the efficacy and safety of eravacycline compared with levofloxacin in participants with complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI).
This study is being conducted to evaluate the safety, efficacy (clinical and microbiological), pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of GSK2251052 and to assess whether it would be a suitable antibiotic for the treatment for febrile lower cUTI and pyelonephritis(complicated and uncomplicated). GSK2251052 will be compared to imipenem-cilastatin, which is an antibiotic commonly used to treat serious cUTI infections. GSK2251052 has a spectrum of microbiological activity that includes pathogens responsible for cUTI.
This is a Phase 3, multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, double dummy study of CXA 201 IV infusions (1500 mg q8h) versus levofloxacin IV infusions (750 mg qd) for the treatment of adults with a cUTI (including pyelonephritis).
This is a study in adult subjects with complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI) comparing treatment with intravenous (IV) coadministered ceftaroline fosamil and NXL104 versus treatment with IV doripenem.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of doripenem compared to cefepime in children hospitalized with complicated urinary tract infections.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intravenous CXA 101 and comparator in complicated urinary tract infection
The purpose of this study is to determine whether NXL104 plus ceftazidime is effective in the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections as compared to a comparator group.
The purpose of this proposal is clinical validation of an electrochemical biochip for rapid pathogen identification and antibiotic susceptibility determination.
Researchers want to find out if a drug called Cipro® XR (ciprofloxacin extended-release) can help people with a complicated urinary tract infection caused by a kind of bacteria called Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The study doctor will give Cipro XR to some people to see if it is safe and works to treat complicated urinary tract infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The study doctor will also gather information about using Cipro XR to treat complicated urinary tract infections caused by other bacteria. About 500 people with complicated urinary tract infections who are 18 years old and older will join this study. Cipro XR is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections and acute uncomplicated pyelonephritis (inflammation of the kidney). The dose of Cipro XR used in this study (1000 mg a day for 7 to 14 days), has been shown to be safe and effective. This study is being done to gather more information on using this dose of Cipro XR for complicated urinary tract infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa, as well as by other bacteria.
This is A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Comparative, Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Imipenem/Cilastatin/Funobactam in Comparison with Meropenem in Hospitalized Adults with Complicated Urinary Tract Infections, including Acute Pyelonephritis.
This is a prospective, phase 3, randomized, multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy study to compare the efficacy and safety of sulopenem followed by sulopenem-etzadroxil/probenecid versus ertapenem followed by ciprofloxacin for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI) in adults.
To Evaluate the Effects of Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Best Available Therapy in patients with complicated urinary tract infections and complicated intra-abdominal infections.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of Ceftazidime Avibactam compared to Doripenem for treating hospitalized patients with complicated urinary tract infections, including acute pyelonephritis
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of Ceftazidime Avibactam compared to Doripenem for treating hospitalized patients with complicated urinary tract infections, including acute pyelonephritis