32 Clinical Trials for Various Conditions
This study will investigate pain outcomes for patients undergoing vaginal hysterectomy with pelvic reconstructive surgery using the LigasureTM vessel sealing device as compared to conventional clamping and suturing methods.
The primary objective of the proposed study is to determine the difference in surgical time between minimally invasive (laparoscopic) sacrocolpopexy performed with concurrent vaginal hysterectomy versus laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy. The secondary objectives are to determine if there are differences in intraoperative adverse events and postoperative mesh-related complications and prolapse recurrence between the groups.
The aim of this study is to compare the effects of preemptive analgesia using liposomal bupivacaine mixed with bupivacaine HCl, versus bupivacaine HCl alone for uterosacral ligament injection in patients undergoing vaginal hysterectomy. We hypothesize that the group receiving a combination of liposomal bupivacaine and bupivacaine HCl will report superior postoperative pain management. Enhancement in pain control should confer a decrease in opioid and other analgesic medication requirements, which may contribute to decreased nausea, vomiting, and higher overall patient satisfaction with pain control.
The purpose of this study is to to determine if there is a difference in patient related outcomes of pain and quality of life following vaginal hysterectomy with vaginal prolapse repair compared to robotic-assisted repair. We hypothesize that pain and quality of life following robotic-assisted repair will be similar to that following vaginal reconstruction, when performed in conjunction with vaginal hysterectomy.
Vasoconstrictive agents are increasingly being used in order to decrease blood loss during vaginal hysterectomy. The first reported study of the use of a vasoconstrictive agent for this purpose was on the use of epinephrine injected intracervically preoperatively by England, et. al. They demonstrated a significant decrease in the amount of blood lost during the surgery but also demonstrated a significant increase in the risk of post-operative infections, most frequently a vaginal cuff cellulitis requiring antibiotic treatment. Recent studies using vasopressin as the vasoconstrictive agent have also found the same significant decrease in blood loss while not demonstrating a difference in the rate of post-operative infections. The more recent studies by Speer and Unger , and Kammerer-Doak, et.al. were larger, better designed studies and are considered more credible. More surgeons are therefore injecting vasopressin intracervically preoperatively. Some surgeons believe that the injection of vasopressin intracervically prior to the initial incision of a vaginal hysterectomy effects surgical plains and therefore makes the surgical dissection more difficult. This is thought to possibly both add to operative time and increase the rate of complications. The aforementioned studies used the injection of saline as a control for the injection of vasopressin or epinephrine. To date, no study has compared the use of vasopressin versus no injection in a controlled, randomized manner. We do not know if the injection of saline intracervically may actually increase the amount of bleeding over the baseline and therefore the decreased blood loss caused by the injection of vasopressin my actually be overestimated. We propose to compare the effects of injecting vasopressin intracervically preoperatively versus no preoperative medication. We will not only evaluate the amount of operative blood loss, but also compare operative time and complication rates.
Simulation training with the Miya Model will improve Operating Room performance of Vaginal Hysterectomy (VH) in novice surgeons and this phase of the study is designed to test that.
This is a prospective cross-sectional study in which patients undergoing major pelvic reconstructive surgery with total vaginal hysterectomy will be recruited and enrolled. At approximately 2 weeks and 12 weeks postoperatively, enrolled patients will be asked to complete a survey detailing their experience with SDD, surgical recovery, and advice for prospective patients.
The primary objective is to assess the impact of patient positioning using the candy cane stirrups as compared to boot stirrups on physical functioning outcomes at 6 weeks post-op
Preemptive analgesia is an intervention which provides an anesthetic prior to initiating a painful stimulus. This trial is examining the effects of a local anesthetic given at the point of innervation prior to performing a vaginal hysterectomy with suspension sutures.
Despite use of intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis, pelvic infection including vaginal and urinary complaints and infections are still noted after hysterectomy. For gynecologic surgery the burden of infection is not only from the skin but from the vagina and urinary tract. Hysterectomy involves a communication via the cervical or vaginal canal directly with the pelvis and thus can lead to a potentially increased risk of infection from both aerobic and anaerobic organisms. Vaginal metronidazole is a standard of care antibiotic for vaginal infections including bacterial vaginosis. Based upon small studies in the peri-operative setting, vaginal metronidazole may provide a benefit in decreasing surgical site infections and urinary infections in conjunction with standard infection prevention protocols. This study is for women undergoing elective subtotal or total hysterectomy by any route of surgery. The main objective of this study is to evaluate if metronidazole inserted per vagina daily for 5 days before elective hysterectomy decreases patient complaints of potential infection or documented post-operative infection. Subjects will be randomized to an intervention or control group. For subjects in the intervention group, vaginal metronidazole 0.75% (MetroGel or Vandazole) will be prescribed and inserted per vagina days 1 through 5 prior to date of surgery. The control group will not receive a metronidazole prescription.
Post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse is a common pelvic floor disorder described as descent of the vaginal apex after hysterectomy. The incidence of post-hysterectomy vault prolapse has been reported to follow 11.6% of hysterectomies performed for prolapse and 1.8% for other benign diseases. The majority of surgical repairs to correct post-hysterectomy vault prolapse are approached via a transvaginal route. A common transvaginal procedure to correct vaginal vault prolapse is the uterosacral ligament suspension. Traditionally, the uterosacral ligaments have been accessed intraperitoneally to perform the vaginal suspension. More recently, an extraperitoneal approach has been utilized with good results. There is limited evidence comparing the the two approaches. Thus, the objectives of this study are to compare compare operative time, hospital stay, cost, surgical success, and other perioperative outcomes between the two approaches.
In this study the investigators will perform a randomized trial to compare the surgical outcomes of vaginal versus abdominal morcellation of the uterus during hysterectomy. In minimally invasive gynecologic surgery small incisions are made in the abdomen and pelvis so that a hysterectomy can be performed by laparoscopy. The challenge is then to remove the uterus, which may be quite large, through these small incisions. One option is to morcellate the uterus and remove the tissue through either a small abdominal incision or an incision in the vagina. When an organ is morcellated it is cut into smaller pieces so that it can be removed, section by section, through a small incision. The investigators will compare these two methods of tissue removal to see whether one results in better surgical outcomes or increased intra-operative or post-operative complications. The primary outcome will be the time it takes to perform the surgery (operative time). Secondary surgical outcomes that will be studied include the amount of blood lost during surgery, post-operative complications, and readmission to the hospital.
The study is a multi-center, randomized, surgical trial of women with symptomatic post-hysterectomy apical (cuff) prolapse desiring surgical treatment. This study will compare the three available surgical treatments performed in usual practice. The purpose of this study is to compare two commonly performed mesh apical repair (sacral colpopexy vs. Apical Transvaginal Mesh) and vaginal native tissue apical repairs with mesh reinforced repairs. The primary outcome is measured over time (up to 60 months) using a survival analysis approach. The investigators hypothesize that treatment failure will not differ between vaginally and abdominally placed mesh for vault vaginal prolapse, and mesh repairs (regardless of route of implantation) will be superior to native tissue apical suspension.
Investigators intend to conduct a prospective randomized trial to compare vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral colposuspension to laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy with sacrocervicopexy. Both surgeries are minimally-invasive surgical standards of care for uterine prolapse repair. Nobody knows if one procedure is superior to the other, as they have not been compared directly. The investigators hypothesize that there is no difference in objective, subjective, or cost-effectiveness between the two procedures for up to two years after surgery.
Is routine uterosacral ligament suspension an appropriate clinical adjunct at the time of hysterectomy? The answers to these questions will facilitate the treatment of many American women. With the results of this study, the investigators would anticipate a reduction in the number of surgeries for pelvic organ prolapse. In addition, if uterosacral ligament suspension was shown to be ineffective, it would not be used routinely in the setting of hysterectomy and women will be spared the additional procedure and possibility of side effects or complications. The relative risks and benefits of adding a prophylactic uterosacral ligament suspension at the time of hysterectomy in women without symptomatic prolapse symptoms have never been studied prospectively.
This is research in which students are queried by questionnaires on their satisfaction with and experience with certain educational practices (use of a camera image projecting during a live surgery) or with pre-recorded video. As data collection only involves survey data collection and satisfaction with an educational experience, and randomization/intervention is only involving use of one type of educational method versus another .
This is a randomized controlled trial to determine the influence of chlorhexidine gluconate surgical/topical antiseptic solutions on the bacterial environment of the vagina during hysterectomy and compare that to the effect of standard iodine-based preparations on the same.
This study has been designed as a prospective randomized trial to be performed at Bridgeport Hospital. Patients planning to undergo a laparoscopic or robotically assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy with or without removal of adnexal structures will be recruited by the Bridgeport Hospital Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery fellows during their preoperative office visit at the Bridgeport Hospital Gynecologic Oncology office. If enrolled, they will be assigned a sequential study identification number. During their preoperative exam, a baseline POP-Q will be performed. Demographic information will be recorded from the electronic medical record.
This study compares outcomes among patients having a total laparoscopic hysterectomy. This involves removing the uterus and cervix using a laparoscopic or keyhole technique. The top of the vagina is routinely sutured closed after this procedure and this study is comparing two different suture materials for this purpose. One suture material is a barbed suture that has the advantage of maintaining good tension and closure on the wound. The other is a standard smooth suture that is commonly used for this procedure. The investigators are comparing the time it takes to close the vaginal cuff, as well as bleeding after surgery and the healing of the top of the vagina.
The purpose of the study is to investigate differences in perioperative and postoperative outcomes between the abdominal (AM) versus vaginal (VM) routes of contained morcellation in participants undergoing laparoscopic total hysterectomies in a randomized controlled trial.
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Zip-stitch™ Vaginal Cuff Closure System. This will be primarily done by measuring the frequency of implant passing following system use. Also assessed will be relevant safety and efficacy endpoints as compared to a two-to-one reference group (V-LOC barbed suture).
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of implementing different types of suturing materials and techniques of vaginal cuff closure in robotic assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy on cost, operative time and post operative surgical outcomes.
The investigators propose prospectively evaluating if adding separate sutures to the angles of the vaginal cuff before running barbed suture reduces the incidence of patient's perception of bleeding after surgery.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether an injection of a local anesthetic (Bupivacaine with epinephrine) in the vaginal cuff prior to closure would result in less immediate postoperative pain medication and increase patient comfort/satisfaction.
The purpose of this study is to learn about the effect of different vaginal cuff closure techniques on pelvic support after laparoscopic hysterectomy and robotic assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign gynecologic conditions.
The purpose of this study is to learn more about the microbes (bacteria) that live in the vagina and the bladder. The investigators are doing this research study to understand the relationship between microbes (the microbiome) and the occurrence of urinary tract infection following surgical removal of the uterus and pelvic organ prolapse repair. The investigators expect Lactobacillus and Gardnerella will be the dominant organisms for most women. Non-Lactobacillus dominant microbiome communities will be more common in women who ultimately develop postoperative urinary tract infection.
The objective aim is to evaluate whether the use of 3D laparoscopy facilitates the vaginal cuff closure of the vaginal cuff during a total laparoscopic hysterectomy among novice laparoscopists (PGY 2-4, Fellow). This is a randomized single blinded controlled trial comparing the difference in 2D vs. 3D in regards to vaginal cuff closure time stratified by residents and fellows. Patients will undergo a total laparoscopic hysterectomy and will be randomized to either 2D versus 3D.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the possible impacts of two techniques of vaginal cuff closure during robotic hysterectomy. We aim to compare vertical vs horizontal vaginal cuff closure and the impact that these techniques have on vaginal length, sexual function, and overall complication rates.
Vaginal cuff dehiscence, a rare complication of gynecologic surgeries, can be devastating, particularly when associated with bowel evisceration. A review of records from 1970 - 2001 at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN revealed a low incidence (0.032%) of vaginal cuff dehiscence after pelvic operation via both abdominal and vaginal approaches3. At a single, large, tertiary care facility, total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) was associated with an increased incidence of vaginal cuff dehiscence compared to other approaches (4.93% vs. 0.29% TVH, and 0.12% TAH)1. A review of our robotic experience revealed a vaginal cuff dehiscence incidence of 4.1%, which is comparable to the previously reported incidence for TLH2. An increasing number of laparoscopic hysterectomies are being performed in the United States with the rate of laparoscopic procedures increasing from 0.3% in 1990 to 11.8% in 20034. With 11.8% of 600,000 annual hysterectomies being performed via the laparoscopic route in the United States, there would be an estimated 3,400 cases of vaginal cuff dehiscence per year. The cause of the higher rate of vaginal cuff dehiscence in both laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomies is currently unknown. One of the major differences between the laparoscopic and robotic approach as compared to the vaginal/abdominal route is the method by which the cervix is amputated from the vagina. With the vaginal and abdominal approaches, a colpotomy is made sharply with a knife or scissors. In contrast, the colpotomy is performed with electrocoagulation with the laparoscopic and robotic routes. One theory to explain the increased dehiscence incidence is the lateral thermal effects of electrocoagulation on the vaginal cuff which may adversely affect tissue healing. This study aims primarily to shed light on the etiology of vaginal cuff healing after a robotic total hysterectomy. This will be done by comparing the extent of thermal injury at the cellular level using monopolar vs CO2 laser at the time of the colpotomy.
The purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility of performing prophylactic McCall culdoplasty at the time of total laparoscopic hysterectomy. The investigators will also be measuring pelvic support (using POP-Q) and sexual function before and at different time points (up to 12 months) postoperatively. The investigators hypothesize that women undergoing the McCall culdoplasty will not have different immediate surgical outcomes (operative time, etc) and may have better pelvic support and sexual function in the future.