Search clinical trials by condition, location and status
Individuals undergoing HD generally have very low physical activity levels, which consequently contributes to elevated levels of perceptions of fatigue, poor physical function, and a decline in overall quality of life, all of which are linked to progressively greater risk for comorbidities and mortality. The various benefits of physical activity for the general population are well understood, showing a dose-response relationship between physical activity and health. While CKD is not reversible, exercise is often encouraged for its potential to slow disease progression, reduce symptom burden, and improve transplant readiness for HD patients. Over the last two decades, efforts have been made to increase physical activity levels in HD patients, yet the benefits are inconsistent and limited. Many interventions have implemented physical activity programs that include simplistic exercise prescriptions, including intradialytic cycling and/or light resistance exercises. These general, non-personalized exercise programs are associated with poor adherence, high dropout rates, and conflicting effects on physical function or other outcomes related to quality of life. As such, many have discussed the need for individualized exercise prescriptions to overcome the barriers that prevent HD patients from meeting national guidelines for exercise. In this context, the purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of a personalized, novel intervention (intervention) compared to a standard of care intervention (comparator), and its effect on perceptions of fatigue, self-reported depression, and physical function. Our primary hypothesis is that the intervention group will elicit greater improvement in physical activity levels than the comparator group. Our secondary hypothesis is that the intervention group will elicit greater improvements in perceptions of fatigue, self-reported depression, and physical function than the comparator group.
This is a multi-center, randomized (1:1), open-label, active-controlled, pragmatic study of the efficacy of vadadustat administered three times a week compared to standard of care erythropoiesis-stimulating agent for the treatment of anemia in in-center hemodialysis participants with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). The total duration of the study is approximately 33 Weeks including screening and follow-up.
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the efficacy of a standard intradialytic exercise program (control group) to an individualized, patient-centered, "Move-More" physical activity intervention (intervention group) in hemodialysis (HD) patients. Exercise programs often fail to yield robust benefits for many HD patients, in part because the type and volume of exercise prescribed is inappropriate for a variety of reasons, and the benefits from these studies are often disappointing, as they are characterized by poor adherence, high dropout rates, and modest effects on physical function, body composition, cardiovascular disease risk, and other outcomes related to quality of life (QOL). To address this, the investigators have designed a novel physical activity intervention "Move More" that is designed to overcome many of the barriers to increasing physical activity in this population. This study aims to compare the efficacy of a standard intradialytic exercise program (control group) to an individualized, patient-centered, "Move-More" physical activity intervention (intervention group) in HD patients. The investigators primary hypothesis is that patients randomized to the Move More intervention will increase their physical activity levels more than those in the intradialytic exercise group. The main question it aims to answer is: • Does "Move More" increase the physical activity levels (minutes) measured through weekly minutes of physical activity and the LoPAQ questionnaire more than those in the standard intradialytic exercise program? For secondary outcomes this study aims to answer the following: * Does "Move More" improve the physical function of hemodialysis patients assessed by the short physical performance battery (SPBB) more than those in the standard intradialytic exercise program? * Does "Move More" decrease fatigue assess by the SONG-HD survey more than those in the standard intradialytic exercise program? * Does "Move More" decrease symptoms of depression assessed by PROMIS Depression Short Form 8a more than those in the standard intradialytic exercise program? * Does "Move More" increase the amount of exercise measured through a point system more than those in the standard intradialytic exercise program? * Does "Move More" improve blood pressure (BP) more than those in the standard intradialytic exercise program?
The Velocity Percutaneous Arterio-Venous System is a minimally invasive method of creating hemodialysis vascular access. The study aims to understand clinical efficacy and initial clinical safety data of the device.
Fatigue is the most common symptom reported by end-stage kidney disease patients on maintenance hemodialysis. Unfortunately, there currently is no medical management for this overwhelming feeling of tiredness. As a result, patients continue to suffer with poor quality of life and impaired daily activities. The purpose of this pilot trial is to find out if bupropion (a medicine commonly prescribed for stopping smoking, seasonal mood disorder, and depression) may help lessen fatigue in hemodialysis patients. In this study, hemodialysis participants will receive bupropion tablet orally three times a week during routine dialysis procedure for consecutive 8 weeks. Study participants will complete a battery of questionnaires to self-report fatigue, cognition, and quality of life. The study team will collect biological specimens. All these procedures will be performed at the dialysis clinic during routine dialysis procedure.
This study is to prospectively compare clinical effectiveness between clinically- matched incremental hemodialysis and conventional hemodialysis in patients with incident kidney dysfunction requiring dialysis and residual kidney function. The study will enroll 350 patients on chronic hemodialysis and 140 caregivers of enrolled patients. Patients will be randomized in 1:1 ratio to either incremental start hemodialysis or conventional hemodialysis. Caregivers will be followed along with patients for an average period of 2 years post randomization.
The SMaRRT-HD trial is a cluster randomized trial of symptom monitoring with supported clinician follow-up using the SMaRRT-HD electronic patient reported outcome measure (ePROM) system versus Usual Care. Approximately 2400 patients at 30 geographically and racially diverse US hemodialysis clinics will be enrolled. The primary trial hypothesis is that regular symptom patient reported outcome measure (PROM) administration with supported clinician follow-up in dialysis care will reduce suffering and improve outcomes by prompting treatment of unrecognized symptoms, and enhancing patient-care team communication. Clinics randomized to the SMaRRT-HD group will adopt the use of SMaRRT-HD for 12 months. SMaRRT-HD is a symptom monitoring system that includes 1) tablet-based symptom reporting using a PROM and 2) supported clinician follow-up consisting of symptom alerts, guidances for symptom management, and symptom tracking reports that are shared with patients. Dialysis clinics randomized to Usual Care will not adopt SMaRRT-HD or any other trial-driven procedures. Usual Care clinics will monitor symptoms through clinical care interactions with participants and by administering a Health Related Quality of Life survey that includes questions about symptoms.
The study will test and compare the efficacy of a single essential amino acid valine with a combination of essential amino acids (EAA) supplement on fatigue, frailty, and cognitive function in end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD) treatment.
This is a multi-center, open-label, parallel-group study to evaluate oral doses of INCB054707 in participants with varying levels of renal function or impairment.
This is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to assess the potential of physical withdrawal from CR845 upon treatment discontinuation after 3 weeks of IV administration at a dose of 0.5 mcg/kg in hemodialysis patients. The purpose of this study is to determine whether hemodialysis patients who take CR845 develop physical dependence and experience withdrawal symptoms upon cessation, as exemplified by symptoms consistent with opioid withdrawal. The study will consist of a Screening Phase, a 3-week Open-label Phase, a 2-week randomized, placebo-controlled, Double-blind Phase and a Follow-up Visit.