The purpose of this study is to is to determine the clinical effectiveness of a single dose of intravenous (IV) medication for the prevention of labor arrest and cesarean delivery in primiparous women undergoing trial of labor.
The investigators think that calcium carbonate can act as an assistive medication to improve contractions during labor.
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if oral calcium carbonate can improve uterine contractions and labor outcomes in term pregnancies. It will also evaluate the safety of calcium carbonate when used during labor. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does oral calcium carbonate increase uterine contraction strength? Does it lead to shorter labor duration or higher vaginal delivery rates? What side effects or complications, if any, occur with calcium carbonate use during labor? Researchers will compare oral calcium carbonate to no treatment to see if it helps improve labor efficiency and reduce cesarean delivery rates. Participants will: Be randomly assigned to receive either 2,000 mg of oral calcium carbonate or no intervention Undergo monitoring with an intrauterine pressure catheter to measure contraction strength Be observed for two hours without oxytocin to assess calcium's direct effect on contractions Have data collected on labor progression, delivery outcomes, and neonatal health
Prolonged labor is usually managed with continuous oxytocin infusion. "Oxytocin rest" has been proposed as a strategy to resolve protracted labor in patients who have received continuous oxytocin without progress. This strategy involves discontinuing oxytocin then restarting infusion after a period of time, under the theory that washout of the oxytocin receptor will strengthen uterine contractions to improve labor progress. "Oxytocin rest" is performed on labor and delivery units across the United States. Yet, there is no randomized or prospective data to support the practice. The purpose of this study is to assess whether oxytocin rest of 60 minutes in patients with prolonged labor reduces risk for cesarean delivery.
The goal of this randomized trial is to test if changing a person's position in labor can increase the chances of delivering their baby vaginally. Specifically, it aims to answer the questions: * In fetuses who are facing upwards (occiput posterior, OP) or sideways (occiput transverse, OT) during labor, does changing the patient's position during active labor to a side-lying posture with a peanut ball increase the chances of them having a successful, spontaneous vaginal delivery? * Does changing the patient's position in active labor affect the position of the baby at the time of delivery? * Do intentional position changes in labor impact patient-perceived autonomy during their labor and delivery experience? Participants will: * Receive an ultrasound during labor to determine the position of their baby * Be asked to adopt a specific position in labor (side-lying with peanut ball) if they are randomized to the study group * Receive additional ultrasounds during labor to assess their baby's position * Fill out a questionnaire about their labor experience following the delivery of their baby
Induction of labor is one of the most common procedures performed on labor and delivery. In the United States, more than 20 percent of pregnant women undergo an induction of labor \[1\]. There is data from small, randomized studies that demonstrates the effectiveness of propranolol, a non-selective beta-blocker, for labor augmentation. This literature suggests a decrease in the amount of time to delivery and a possible reduction in cesarean section rates when propranolol is used in conjunction with oxytocin for induction of labor compared to oxytocin alone \[2-8\]. Alpha- and beta-adrenergic receptors have been identified in the human myometrium. Propranolol has been shown in studies to enhance uterine contractions and may be a useful tool in this population of women. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to assess whether the administration of propranolol at time of labor dystocia reduces time to delivery.
This pilot, randomized control trial will test whether or not a specific circuit of position changes improves maternal outcomes in cases of prolonged labor. Patient who have prolonged labor will be approached for consent and randomization to one of two study groups: circuit intervention against routine standard of care position changes. 82 patients will be enrolled in the study. Exclusion criteria will include: any uterine infection prior to randomization, magnesium sulfate treatment, major fetal anomalies, BMI ≥50, non-reassuring fetal status prior to randomization, or any maternal diagnosis that precludes safety or feasibility of the circuit of maternal position changes. The 3 aims of the study will include: the outcome that the circuit of position changes has on the duration of the first stage of labor, maternal and neonatal morbidity, and maternal satisfaction.
The investigators aim to evaluate the safety and efficacy of administering calcium carbonate to laboring participants undergoing labor inductions. The investigators hypothesize that calcium carbonate is a low-risk preventative measure to decrease oxytocin induction time and dosage, decrease the rate of labor dystocia, decrease the rate of cesarean deliveries, and demonstrate no differences in maternal or neonatal safety outcomes.
This observational study characterizes the relationship between amniotic fluid lactate and uterine electromyography during labor in healthy individuals at term planning a vaginal birth. Additional comparison measures and outcomes measures will be collected and analyzed as exploratory measures.
Shortening the second stage of labor, the time spent pushing the baby out, is important for positive mother and infant's outcomes. Lack of progress of labor for any reason is the most common reason for cesarean section in women having their first baby and the second most common reason for cesarean section in women who have already had a baby. In 2014, a large study done across the United States showed increases in complications in both mother and infant when pushing was prolonged, including uterine infection, postpartum hemorrhage, more extensive vaginal tearing, shoulder dystocia, 5 minute Apgar score less than 4, infant admission to Neonatal Intensive Care Unit and neonatal infections. Therefore, the challenge is to consider alternative practices in order to maximize a mother's chance of a vaginal delivery and minimize these associated risks to both mother and baby. Mouth guards are used primarily in contact sports, and have been demonstrated to reduce or prevent injury to the teeth. Additionally, it has been proposed that wearing a mouth guard increases the strength of different muscle groups. A recent randomized controlled pilot study including women with their first pregnancy using a dental support device (DSD) during the second stage of labor evaluated the length of the second stage and outcomes. They found a significant decrease of 38% in the length of pushing time in the group that used a DSD. Additionally, there was a decreased rate of cesarean section in this group, however a p-value was not reported. This study only included 64 patients. A second, larger trial did not find a significant difference in pushing time, however the rate of interventions such as a vacuum or forceps-assisted vaginal delivery and cesarean section were much higher in the control group due to prolonged pushing. The results of the second study are contradictory in nature, yet the researchers do not provide hypotheses into why this may be. It is clear from the previously mentioned studies that further research is needed. Our hypothesis is that using such a device would help women to push more effectively during the second stage of labor thus shortening the time needed to push the baby out and increasing the rate of vaginal delivery. The purpose of this study is to determine whether wearing a mouth guard in the second stage of labor affects the length of the second stage of labor and improves mother \& infant outcomes.