Search clinical trials by condition, location and status
The goal of this pilot randomized control trial (RCT) is to test the feasibility of Caring Connections, a Culturally Adapted Linking Individuals Needing Care (CA-LINC) suicide prevention care coordination intervention for high-risk suicidal youth. This consumer-, community-, and theory-driven care coordination intervention is designed to reduce suicide ideation and behavior (SIB) by improving service engagement. Connections is a 90-day intervention that integrates engagement and follow-up strategies to assess/monitor suicide risk, facilitate service use referrals/linkages, develop/refine safety plans, and create villages of care. The intervention incorporates cultural promotive factors, empowerment, and motivational strategies aimed at supporting youth, enhancing strengths, promoting hope, improving family relationships, and reinforcing caring messages. Primary research questions include: 1. Is Caring Connections feasible to use for suicidal high-risk youth? 2. Does Caring Connections have the potential to reduce suicide ideation and behaviors among high-risk suicidal youth? For the pilot RCT, 80 youth participants ages 13-19 who meet the inclusion criteria will be randomly assigned to one of two conditions: Caring Connections (n=40) or Treatment as Usual (n=40). Additionally, investigators will enroll 80 caregivers of youth meeting inclusion criteria and 20 Mental Healthcare, Healthcare Providers, Community Stakeholders, and/or Care Coordinators with experience working with suicidal youth. Researchers will compare those receiving Caring Connections with treatment as usual to see if suicidal ideation and behaviors, and engagement.
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if a new care program, called the COORDINATE Program, can help older adults with two or more chronic health conditions. These individuals are being discharged from special hospital units called Intermediate Care Units (IMCUs), which care for people who are very sick but don't need intensive care. The main questions this study wants to answer are: 1. Can the COORDINATE Program improve participants' quality of life? 2. Can the program reduce emergency visits, intensive care admissions, and rehospitalizations? Researchers will compare the COORDINATE Program to the enhanced usual care with extra support to see if it works better. Participants will receive either the COORDINATE Program or enhanced usual care. They will also complete surveys at three different time points: before hospital discharge, at 6 weeks, and at 3 months. For those in the COORDINATE Program group, a trained nurse will guide them through: 1. A needs assessment to find out what matters most to them 2. A list of helpful questions to ask their care team 3. Goal-setting to support managing their conditions 4. Tracking their symptoms and progress 5. Attend a discharge visit and have 3 follow-up phone or video calls over 6 weeks Participants in both groups will be compensated for completing the surveys. The study hopes to improve how care is given to older adults with complex health needs and reduce unnecessary hospital visits.
The goal of this clinical trial is to determine the feasibility of eGAPcare, a telehealth modification of the GAPcare fall prevention intervention, in older adults in a community emergency department. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Can telehealth physical therapy and pharmacy consultations be conducted in a community emergency department? * Does the telehealth modification of GAPcare decrease recurrent falls at 6 months? Participants will * Receive telehealth physical therapy and pharmacy consultation while in the emergency department * Participate in follow-up visits over the phone for 6 months following the initial emergency department visit * Complete study questionnaires delivered by study staff.
The goal of this clinical trial is to improve the processes of Type 2 Diabetes (T2D) care coordination and treatment in the emergency department (ED) by utilizing clinical decision support mechanisms in the electronic health record (EHR). The main question is whether electronic prompts triggered by hyperglycemia and elevated A1c results in providers providing earlier treatments and faster time to subsequent primary care appointment and greater reduction in hemoglobin A1c (HA1c). ED clinicians will receive alerts called Our Practice Advisories (OPA's) through the EPIC EHR. The 1st OPA triggers when a random point-of-care (POC) glucose is ≥250 mg/dL, prompting a suggested additional HA1c order. A 2nd OPA triggers if the resulting HA1c is ≥10%, prompting consideration of further care coordination in the Observation Unit. Investigators will compare the outcomes post-intervention compared to pre-intervention.
Native Hawaiians (NH) are 9.5 times more likely to be on dialysis or need a kidney transplant compared to Whites. They have the highest end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) incidence rates in the nation, begin dialysis at younger ages (30-50 years), and one of the most under-studied racial/ethnic groups in chronic kidney disease (CKD) research. This project's outcome is to improve kidney disease follow-up among early stage NHs at high risk by aligning health equity with a culturally appropriate care coordination systems model.
The purpose of this randomized clinical trial is to learn if 'complex' cancer patients who receive care guided by a health system intervention, Primary Care Connect (PC2) have their risks of cardiovascular disease (CVD) managed better than those who receive usual care. This study focuses on "complex" cancer survivors who have higher CVD risk when diagnosed with cancer because they also have had a diagnosis of 1 or more chronic conditions (e.g., hypertension, diabetes, and/or hyperlipidemia) requiring medication management. This study also aims to learn about the ease of implementing the health system intervention from the perspectives of cancer teams, primary care teams, and complex cancer patients. The main questions the study aims to answer are: * Do patients enrolled in the PC2 arm remain connected to their primary care teams during active cancer treatment for chronic disease management compared to patients in usual care? * Do patients enrolled in the PC2 arm have better management of their chronic conditions during active cancer treatment compared to patients in usual care? * How do the care team and patients experience this change in care delivery related to their work and care experiences? This study will compare complex cancer survivors who receive care according to the PC2 intervention to usual care to see if PC2 works to improve cardiovascular risk management. Participants will: * receive educational materials about the study upon enrollment * complete on-line or written surveys at 4 times * Visit the clinic for check ups and test related to the study 4 times
The lack of postpartum primary care coordination is a missed opportunity to increase primary care engagement and manage chronic conditions early in life, especially for the \>30% of pregnant people who have or are at risk for these conditions. This study aims to increase postpartum primary care engagement, quality, and experience by strengthening postpartum transitions to primary care using a behavioral economics-informed, multi-component intervention integrated into usual inpatient postpartum care. Using a randomized controlled trial and repeated outcome assessments through administrative and survey data, this study will generate rigorous, actionable evidence to ensure primary care coordination becomes standard postpartum care practice, potentially catalyzing sustained primary care engagement throughout life.
This clinical trial evaluates the impact of an education and navigation support tool (ENST) on patient and caregiver participation in care coordination for bladder cancer that has spread to nearby tissue or lymph nodes (locally advanced), to other places in the body (metastatic) or that cannot be removed by surgery (unresectable). Patients with advanced bladder cancer tend to be older, have multiple medical conditions and often have poor access to health care. An ENST may be an effective method to improve participation in treatment decision-making and care planning among patients with locally advanced, metastatic and unresectable bladder cancer and their caregivers.
The goal of this clinical trial is to determine the efficacy of a client-center care coordination intervention (C4) in improving pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) adherence in Black men who have sex with men (MSM). The main aims of the study are: 1. Determine the efficacy of C4 for increasing PrEP adherence among Black MSM. 2. Identify the optimal dose of C4 implementation for maximizing its effect on PrEP adherence. 3. Describe the acceptability and feasibility of C4 implementation in community settings. Participants in the clinical trial will be randomized to receive the intervention or standard of care for PrEP in two sites. Researchers will compare administration of C4 to standard of care to see if C4 improves adherence to PrEP. C4 is a longitudinal intervention which provides individualized client-centered HIV prevention and support services designed to address health and psychosocial needs that impact the success of PrEP use and adherence (i.e., co-morbidities, substance use, mental health, housing, etc.). The intervention pulls from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Comprehensive Risk Counseling and Services (CRCS) and Self-Determination Theory (SDT) to support client-identified HIV prevention goals to promote, adopt, and maintain PrEP use. CRCS is a public health strategy to assist persons in developing behavioral goals to reduce HIV acquisition and transmission. In this intervention, the HIV prevention plan element of CRCS will be the foundation of the C4 intervention. After the initial prevention plan is developed, elements of SDT will be used to implement a client-centered care approach to assist in addressing issues which many arise which impede successful PrEP adherence.
This pragmatic clinical trial embedded in an accountable care organization will determine the comparative effectiveness of two approaches for assigning care coordinators to older adults at risk for cardiovascular outcomes. The hypothesis is that assigning care coordinators to older adults based on perceived need will be more effective at preventing emergency department visits and hospitalizations compared to usual care.