Clinical Trial Results for In Vitro Fertilization

4 Clinical Trials for In Vitro Fertilization

Focus your search

RECRUITING
Use of Artificial Intelligence for Clinical Assessment of Assisted Reproductive Techniques and IVF Outcomes
Description

The use of machine learning techniques using an artificial intelligence tool is proposed to analyze clinical data to predict best possible IVF/ART outcomes. This tool has been utilized to accurately predict embryo quality here at Cornell. Utilizing this tool to assess objective clinical findings and predict outcomes of assisted reproductive techniques is sought, with the ultimate goal of an automated tool to reduce implicit physician bias. Within this goal, using this tool to objectively and accurately assess baseline ovarian reserve at the start of an ART cycle is proposed, using 3D sonography to image the ovary and artificial intelligence tool to objectively identify baseline antral follicle counts.

RECRUITING
Fertilo In Vitro Research Study and Trial
Description

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of using Fertilo for In vitro maturation (IVM) in participants 18-35 years of age. The main question it aims to answer is whether the use of Fertilo is superior to using Medicult IVM for In vitro maturation. Researchers will compare the number of ongoing pregnancies at 12 weeks gestation for participants in each arm. * Arm 1 participants will have all cumulus oocyte complexes (COCs), or eggs surrounded by helper cells, cultured in Fertilo for 30 hours. * Arm 2 participants will have all cumulus oocyte complexes (COCs), or eggs surrounded by helper cells, cultured in Medicult IVM for 30 hours.

RECRUITING
Assessing Ketorolac (Toradol) at Oocyte Retrieval
Description

To determine if a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), Ketorolac (Toradol), can improve pain control and decrease narcotic use after undergoing egg retrieval.

RECRUITING
The LUTEAL Trial: Luteal Stimulation vs. Estrogen Priming Protocol
Description

Ovarian reserve defines the quantity and quality of the ovarian primordial follicular pool. Diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) indicates a reduction in the quantity of ovarian follicular pool to less than expected for age. It is an important cause of infertility in many couples. To date, there is no clear consensus in the literature on the definition of diminished ovarian reserve, and it is unclear whether low oocyte yield results from an abnormal atresia rate of the follicle pool, or from a lower follicle pool at birth or whether it can just occur as a normal variation in the population. The ovarian response to controlled ovarian stimulation with gonadotropins (for example, for in vitro fertilization) is largely determined by the ovarian reserve, and there are numerous different ovarian stimulation protocols that are employed to try and increase the oocyte yield of a particular cycle. There is no consensus on which, if any, of these protocols are superior and preferred for patient with DOR. Luteal gonadotropin stimulation is a protocol of controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) for use in assisted reproductive technologies (ART) that has emerged over the past decade as an acceptable alternative to the classic follicular gonadotropin stimulation. The luteal estradiol patch protocol was introduced in 2005 in patients with poor response to controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) and to address the phenomenon of early follicle recruitment in patients with diminished ovarian reserve (DOR). Luteal gonadotropin stimulation can potentially achieve the same effect by initiating follicular recruitment for IVF prior to the body's own premature recruitment. Our hypothesis is that the luteal stimulation protocol and estradiol priming protocol are equivalent with regard to the outcome of number of mature oocytes retrieved. Patients who will be undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation and who have a diagnosis of diminished ovarian reserve will be considered for this trial, and enrolled if meeting all inclusion and no exclusion criteria.